The Governance of Intimacy: A Preliminary Policy Analysis of Romantic AI Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22000v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 15:18:27 GMT
• Title: The Governance of Intimacy: A Preliminary Policy Analysis of Romantic AI Platforms
• Abstract summary: Romantic AI platforms invite intimate emotional disclosure, yet their data governance practices remain underexamined.<n>This study analyses the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service of six Western and Chinese romantic AI platforms.
• Score: 11.396490505368952
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Romantic AI platforms invite intimate emotional disclosure, yet their data governance practices remain underexamined. This preliminary study analyses the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service of six Western and Chinese romantic AI platforms. We find that intimate disclosures are often positioned as reusable data assets, with broad permissions for storage, analysis, and model training. We identify default training appropriation, ownership reconstruction, and intimate history assetization as key mechanisms structuring these practices, expanding platforms' rights while shifting risk onto users. Our findings surface key governance challenges in romantic AI and are intended to provoke discussion and inform future empirical and design research on human AI intimacy and its governance.

Related papers

• From Vulnerable Data Subjects to Vulnerabilizing Data Practices: Navigating the Protection Paradox in AI-Based Analyses of Platformized Lives [0.5437050212139087]
  This paper traces a conceptual shift from understanding vulnerability as a static, essentialized property of data subjects to examining how it is actively enacted through data practices.<n>We argue that the ethical integrity of data science depends not just on who is studied, but on how technical pipelines transform "vulnerable" individuals into data subjects whose vulnerability can be further precarized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T12:12:38Z)
• Technically Love: The Evolution of Human-AI Romance Discourse on Reddit [15.775049505994703]
  We analyze a dataset of 3,383 self-disclosed romantic companion AI posts from Reddit-2025)<n>We find significant topic drift, with discussions moving away from positive intimate relationships toward high-precision governance, technical issues, and real-world consequences.<n>These shifts highlight a transition in how human-AI romance is framed-moving from private experiences to technical mediation and regulation-with implications for the design and governance of companion AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T21:26:59Z)
• Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models [28.389198065125314]
  selective forgetting (also known as machine unlearning) has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>Despite its promise, selective forgetting raises significant privacy concerns.<n>We present the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating privacy vulnerabilities in selective forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:04:06Z)
• "We are not Future-ready": Understanding AI Privacy Risks and Existing Mitigation Strategies from the Perspective of AI Developers in Europe [56.1653658714305]
  We interviewed 25 AI developers based in Europe to understand which privacy threats they believe pose the greatest risk to users, developers, and businesses.<n>We find that there is little consensus among AI developers on the relative ranking of privacy risks.<n>While AI developers are aware of proposed mitigation strategies for addressing these risks, they reported minimal real-world adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T13:51:33Z)
• A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymization [2.7493647230491907]
  This survey provides a comprehensive overview of current trends and recent advances in text anonymization techniques.<n>The survey further explores domain-specific challenges and tailored solutions in critical sectors such as healthcare, law, finance, and education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T12:43:06Z)
• A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z)
• Clio-X: AWeb3 Solution for Privacy-Preserving AI Access to Digital Archives [1.3713383780077602]
  This paper explores how privacy-enhancing technologies can support archives to preserve control over sensitive content while still being able to make it available for access by researchers.<n>We present Clio-X, a decentralized, privacy-first Web3 digital solution designed to embed PETs into archival and support AI-enabled reference and access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T05:30:38Z)
• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [138.07763415496288]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions [0.0]
  This survey explores the landscape of privacy-preserving mechanisms tailored for large language models.<n>We examine their efficacy in addressing key privacy challenges, such as membership inference and model inversion attacks.<n>By synthesizing state-of-the-art approaches and future trends, this paper provides a foundation for developing robust, privacy-preserving large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T00:24:09Z)
• Assessing Privacy Policies with AI: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Challenges [6.916147439085307]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to assess privacy policies for users automatically. We explore the challenges of this approach in three pillars, namely technical feasibility, ethical implications, and legal compatibility. Our findings aim to identify potential for future research, and to foster a discussion on the use of LLM technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T21:36:35Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.