Assessing Privacy Policies with AI: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08381v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:36:35 GMT
• Title: Assessing Privacy Policies with AI: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Challenges
• Authors: Irem Aydin, Hermann Diebel-Fischer, Vincent Freiberger, Julia Möller-Klapperich, Erik Buchmann, Michael Färber, Anne Lauber-Rönsberg, Birte Platow,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to assess privacy policies for users automatically. We explore the challenges of this approach in three pillars, namely technical feasibility, ethical implications, and legal compatibility. Our findings aim to identify potential for future research, and to foster a discussion on the use of LLM technologies.
• Score: 6.916147439085307
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The growing use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT series, leads to disruptive changes across organizations. At the same time, there is a growing concern about how organizations handle personal data. Thus, privacy policies are essential for transparency in data processing practices, enabling users to assess privacy risks. However, these policies are often long and complex. This might lead to user confusion and consent fatigue, where users accept data practices against their interests, and abusive or unfair practices might go unnoticed. LLMss can be used to assess privacy policies for users automatically. In this interdisciplinary work, we explore the challenges of this approach in three pillars, namely technical feasibility, ethical implications, and legal compatibility of using LLMs to assess privacy policies. Our findings aim to identify potential for future research, and to foster a discussion on the use of LLM technologies for enabling users to fulfil their important role as decision-makers in a constantly developing AI-driven digital economy.

Related papers

• AI Delegates with a Dual Focus: Ensuring Privacy and Strategic Self-Disclosure [42.96087647326612]
  We conduct a pilot study to investigate user preferences for AI delegates across various social relations and task scenarios. We then propose a novel AI delegate system that enables privacy-conscious self-disclosure. Our user study demonstrates that the proposed AI delegate strategically protects privacy, pioneering its use in diverse and dynamic social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T08:45:15Z)
• How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Review [15.15468770348023]
  We evaluate large language models' performance in privacy-related tasks such as privacy information extraction (PIE), legal and regulatory key point detection (KPD), and question answering (QA) Through an empirical assessment, we investigate the capacity of several prominent LLMs, including BERT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and custom models, in executing privacy compliance checks and technical privacy reviews. While LLMs show promise in automating privacy reviews and identifying regulatory discrepancies, significant gaps persist in their ability to fully comply with evolving legal standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T01:51:37Z)
• Preserving Privacy in Large Language Models: A Survey on Current Threats and Solutions [12.451936012379319]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, finding applications across various domains. Their reliance on massive internet-sourced datasets for training brings notable privacy issues. Certain application-specific scenarios may require fine-tuning these models on private data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-10T05:41:19Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Human-Centered Privacy Research in the Age of Large Language Models [31.379232599019915]
  This SIG aims to bring together researchers with backgrounds in usable security and privacy, human-AI collaboration, NLP, or any other related domains to share their perspectives and experiences on this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T02:32:45Z)
• Experts-in-the-Loop: Establishing an Effective Workflow in Crafting Privacy Q&A [0.0]
  We propose a dynamic workflow for transforming privacy policies into privacy question-and-answer (Q&A) pairs. Thereby, we facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration among legal experts and conversation designers. Our proposed workflow underscores continuous improvement and monitoring throughout the construction of privacy Q&As.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T20:32:59Z)
• Privacy in Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Future Directions [84.73301039987128]
  We analyze the current privacy attacks targeting large language models (LLMs) and categorize them according to the adversary's assumed capabilities. We present a detailed overview of prominent defense strategies that have been developed to counter these privacy attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T13:23:54Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• PCAL: A Privacy-preserving Intelligent Credit Risk Modeling Framework Based on Adversarial Learning [111.19576084222345]
  This paper proposes a framework of Privacy-preserving Credit risk modeling based on Adversarial Learning (PCAL) PCAL aims to mask the private information inside the original dataset, while maintaining the important utility information for the target prediction task performance. Results indicate that PCAL can learn an effective, privacy-free representation from user data, providing a solid foundation towards privacy-preserving machine learning for credit risk analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T07:04:59Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)
• Beyond privacy regulations: an ethical approach to data usage in transportation [64.86110095869176]
  We describe how Federated Machine Learning can be applied to the transportation sector. We see Federated Learning as a method that enables us to process privacy-sensitive data, while respecting customer's privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T15:10:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.