MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarios
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22638v1
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 05:39:38 GMT
- Title: MobilityBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Route-Planning Agents in Real-World Mobility Scenarios
- Authors: Zhiheng Song, Jingshuai Zhang, Chuan Qin, Chao Wang, Chao Chen, Longfei Xu, Kaikui Liu, Xiangxiang Chu, Hengshu Zhu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce MobilityBench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs)-based route-planning agents in real-world mobility scenarios.<n> MobilityBench is constructed from large-scale, anonymized real user queries collected from Amap.<n>We propose a multi-dimensional evaluation protocol centered on outcome validity, complemented by assessments of instruction understanding, planning, tool use, and efficiency.
- Score: 34.570930885283694
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Route-planning agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for supporting everyday human mobility through natural language interaction and tool-mediated decision making. However, systematic evaluation in real-world mobility settings is hindered by diverse routing demands, non-deterministic mapping services, and limited reproducibility. In this study, we introduce MobilityBench, a scalable benchmark for evaluating LLM-based route-planning agents in real-world mobility scenarios. MobilityBench is constructed from large-scale, anonymized real user queries collected from Amap and covers a broad spectrum of route-planning intents across multiple cities worldwide. To enable reproducible, end-to-end evaluation, we design a deterministic API-replay sandbox that eliminates environmental variance from live services. We further propose a multi-dimensional evaluation protocol centered on outcome validity, complemented by assessments of instruction understanding, planning, tool use, and efficiency. Using MobilityBench, we evaluate multiple LLM-based route-planning agents across diverse real-world mobility scenarios and provide an in-depth analysis of their behaviors and performance. Our findings reveal that current models perform competently on Basic information retrieval and Route Planning tasks, yet struggle considerably with Preference-Constrained Route Planning, underscoring significant room for improvement in personalized mobility applications. We publicly release the benchmark data, evaluation toolkit, and documentation at https://github.com/AMAP-ML/MobilityBench .
Related papers
- TravelBench: A Broader Real-World Benchmark for Multi-Turn and Tool-Using Travel Planning [22.3041021610283]
Travel planning is a natural real-world task to test large language models (LLMs) planning and tool-use abilities.<n>TravelBench is a benchmark for fully real-world travel planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-27T18:25:14Z) - Leveraging RAG-LLMs for Urban Mobility Simulation and Analysis [1.7521077353162031]
We present a cloud-based, LLM-powered shared e-mobility platform, integrated with a mobile application for personalized route recommendations.<n>The system achieves an average execution accuracy of 0.81 on system operator queries and 0.98 on user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T15:23:11Z) - Enhancing Large Language Models for Mobility Analytics with Semantic Location Tokenization [29.17336622418242]
We propose QT-Mob, a novel framework that significantly enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) for mobility analytics.<n> QT-Mob introduces a location tokenization module that learns compact, semantically rich tokens to represent locations.<n>Experiments on three real-world dataset demonstrate the superior performance in both next-location prediction and mobility recovery tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T02:17:50Z) - ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks [64.86209459039313]
ThinkGeo is an agentic benchmark designed to evaluate tool-augmented agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning.<n>We implement a ReAct-style interaction loop and evaluate both open and closed-source LLMs on 486 structured agentic tasks with 1,773 expert-verified reasoning steps.<n>Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T17:59:38Z) - MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering [57.156093929365255]
Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents.<n>MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios.<n>Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T17:35:43Z) - EMMOE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Embodied Mobile Manipulation in Open Environments [11.97783742296183]
Embodied Mobile Manipulation in Open Environments is a benchmark that requires agents to interpret user instructions and execute long-horizon everyday tasks in continuous space.<n>Embodied Mobile Manipulation in Open Environments seamlessly integrates high-level and low-level embodied tasks into a unified framework, along with three new metrics for more diverse assessment.<n>We designmodel, a sophisticated agent system consists of LLM with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), light weighted navigation and manipulation models, and multiple error detection mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T16:42:36Z) - Navigating Motion Agents in Dynamic and Cluttered Environments through LLM Reasoning [69.5875073447454]
This paper advances motion agents empowered by large language models (LLMs) toward autonomous navigation in dynamic and cluttered environments.<n>Our training-free framework supports multi-agent coordination, closed-loop replanning, and dynamic obstacle avoidance without retraining or fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T13:39:09Z) - Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z) - Bench4Merge: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Merging in Realistic Dense Traffic with Micro-Interactive Vehicles [21.832221839624527]
We propose a benchmark for assessing motion planning capabilities in merging scenarios.<n>Our approach involves other vehicles trained in large scale datasets with micro-behavioral characteristics.<n>We have obtained an evaluation of existing methods and identified common issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T11:35:33Z) - TrafficBots: Towards World Models for Autonomous Driving Simulation and
Motion Prediction [149.5716746789134]
We show data-driven traffic simulation can be formulated as a world model.
We present TrafficBots, a multi-agent policy built upon motion prediction and end-to-end driving.
Experiments on the open motion dataset show TrafficBots can simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T18:28:41Z) - Object Goal Navigation using Goal-Oriented Semantic Exploration [98.14078233526476]
This work studies the problem of object goal navigation which involves navigating to an instance of the given object category in unseen environments.
We propose a modular system called, Goal-Oriented Semantic Exploration' which builds an episodic semantic map and uses it to explore the environment efficiently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T17:52:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.