CXReasonAgent: Evidence-Grounded Diagnostic Reasoning Agent for Chest X-rays

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23276v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 17:51:21 GMT
• Title: CXReasonAgent: Evidence-Grounded Diagnostic Reasoning Agent for Chest X-rays
• Authors: Hyungyung Lee, Hangyul Yoon, Edward Choi,
• Abstract summary: Chest X-ray plays a central role in thoracic diagnosis, and its interpretation inherently requires multi-step, evidence-grounded reasoning.<n>Large vision-language models (LVLMs) generate plausible responses that are not faithfully grounded in diagnostic evidence.<n>We present CXReasonAgent, a diagnostic agent that integrates a large language model with clinically grounded diagnostic tools.
• Score: 16.09644321057171
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Chest X-ray plays a central role in thoracic diagnosis, and its interpretation inherently requires multi-step, evidence-grounded reasoning. However, large vision-language models (LVLMs) often generate plausible responses that are not faithfully grounded in diagnostic evidence and provide limited visual evidence for verification, while also requiring costly retraining to support new diagnostic tasks, limiting their reliability and adaptability in clinical settings. To address these limitations, we present CXReasonAgent, a diagnostic agent that integrates a large language model (LLM) with clinically grounded diagnostic tools to perform evidence-grounded diagnostic reasoning using image-derived diagnostic and visual evidence. To evaluate these capabilities, we introduce CXReasonDial, a multi-turn dialogue benchmark with 1,946 dialogues across 12 diagnostic tasks, and show that CXReasonAgent produces faithfully grounded responses, enabling more reliable and verifiable diagnostic reasoning than LVLMs. These findings highlight the importance of integrating clinically grounded diagnostic tools, particularly in safety-critical clinical settings.

Related papers

• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• CXRAgent: Director-Orchestrated Multi-Stage Reasoning for Chest X-Ray Interpretation [62.0150409256153]
  We propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation.<n>The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator.<n>Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T10:31:30Z)
• Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
  We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
  Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z)
• Integrating clinical reasoning into large language model-based diagnosis through etiology-aware attention steering [7.092919468004549]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate significant capabilities in medical text understanding and generation.<n>This study aims to enhance LLMs' diagnostic accuracy and clinical reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T03:05:43Z)
• RadFabric: Agentic AI System with Reasoning Capability for Radiology [61.25593938175618]
  RadFabric is a multi agent, multimodal reasoning framework that unifies visual and textual analysis for comprehensive CXR interpretation.<n>System employs specialized CXR agents for pathology detection, an Anatomical Interpretation Agent to map visual findings to precise anatomical structures, and a Reasoning Agent powered by large multimodal reasoning models to synthesize visual, anatomical, and clinical data into transparent and evidence based diagnoses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T03:10:33Z)
• CXReasonBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Structured Diagnostic Reasoning in Chest X-rays [15.485027018658101]
  We present CheXStruct and CXReasonBench, a structured pipeline and benchmark built on the publicly available MIMIC-CXR-JPG dataset.<n>CheXStruct automatically derives a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps directly from chest X-rays.<n> CXReasonBench leverages this pipeline to evaluate whether models can perform clinically valid reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T16:44:21Z)
• DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models [25.13622249539088]
  DiagnosisArena is a benchmark designed to rigorously assess professional-level diagnostic competence.<n> DiagnosisArena consists of 1,113 pairs of segmented patient cases and corresponding diagnoses, spanning 28 medical specialties.<n>Our study reveals that even the most advanced reasoning models, o3, o1, and DeepSeek-R1, achieve only 51.12%, 31.09%, and 17.79% accuracy, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T09:14:53Z)
• MSDiagnosis: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Step Clinical Diagnosis [8.641421154025211]
  We propose a Chinese clinical diagnostic benchmark, called MSDiagnosis.<n>This benchmark consists of 2,225 cases from 12 departments, covering tasks such as primary diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and final diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T14:31:57Z)
• Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner Modeling: An Inductive Paradigm [36.60917255464867]
  We propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models. We show that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T07:18:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.