MediX-R1: Open Ended Medical Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23363v1
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:59:46 GMT
- Title: MediX-R1: Open Ended Medical Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Sahal Shaji Mullappilly, Mohammed Irfan Kurpath, Omair Mohamed, Mohamed Zidan, Fahad Khan, Salman Khan, Rao Anwer, Hisham Cholakkal,
- Abstract summary: We introduce MediX-R1, an open-ended Reinforcement Learning framework for medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n> MediX-R1 fine-tunes a baseline vision- backbone with Group Based RL and a composite reward tailored for medical reasoning.<n>Our results demonstrate that open-ended RL with comprehensive reward signals and LLM-based evaluation is a practical path toward reliable medical reasoning in multimodal models.
- Score: 30.11159628872015
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We introduce MediX-R1, an open-ended Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework for medical multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that enables clinically grounded, free-form answers beyond multiple-choice formats. MediX-R1 fine-tunes a baseline vision-language backbone with Group Based RL and a composite reward tailored for medical reasoning: an LLM-based accuracy reward that judges semantic correctness with a strict YES/NO decision, a medical embedding-based semantic reward to capture paraphrases and terminology variants, and lightweight format and modality rewards that enforce interpretable reasoning and modality recognition. This multi-signal design provides stable, informative feedback for open-ended outputs where traditional verifiable or MCQ-only rewards fall short. To measure progress, we propose a unified evaluation framework for both text-only and image+text tasks that uses a Reference-based LLM-as-judge in place of brittle string-overlap metrics, capturing semantic correctness, reasoning, and contextual alignment. Despite using only $\sim51$K instruction examples, MediX-R1 achieves excellent results across standard medical LLM (text-only) and VLM (image + text) benchmarks, outperforming strong open-source baselines and delivering particularly large gains on open-ended clinical tasks. Our results demonstrate that open-ended RL with comprehensive reward signals and LLM-based evaluation is a practical path toward reliable medical reasoning in multimodal models. Our trained models, curated datasets and source code are available at https://medix.cvmbzuai.com
Related papers
- A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z) - MRG-R1: Reinforcement Learning for Clinically Aligned Medical Report Generation [23.22547135801011]
We propose a semantic-driven reinforcement learning (SRL) method for medical report generation.<n>SRL encourages clinical-correctness-guided learning beyond imitation of language style.<n>We evaluate Medical Report Generation with SRL on two datasets: IU X-Ray and MIMIC-CXR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-18T03:57:55Z) - Enhancing the Medical Context-Awareness Ability of LLMs via Multifaceted Self-Refinement Learning [49.559151128219725]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in the medical domain, achieving strong performance on several benchmarks.<n>However, they continue to underperform in real-world medical scenarios, which often demand stronger context-awareness.<n>We propose Multifaceted Self-Refinement (MuSeR), a data-driven approach that enhances LLMs' context-awareness along three key facets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T08:13:23Z) - MedAlign: A Synergistic Framework of Multimodal Preference Optimization and Federated Meta-Cognitive Reasoning [52.064286116035134]
We develop MedAlign, a framework to ensure visually accurate LVLM responses for Medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA)<n>We first propose a multimodal Direct Preference Optimization (mDPO) objective to align preference learning with visual context.<n>We then design a Retrieval-Aware Mixture-of-Experts (RA-MoE) architecture that utilizes image and text similarity to route queries to a specialized and context-augmented LVLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T02:11:05Z) - Proactive Reasoning-with-Retrieval Framework for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [15.530083855947987]
We propose the first Multimodal Medical Reasoning-with-Retrieval framework, Med-RwR.<n>Med-RwR actively retrieves external knowledge by querying observed symptoms or domain-specific medical concepts during reasoning.<n> Evaluation on various public medical benchmarks demonstrates Med-RwR's significant improvements over baseline models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T05:18:18Z) - MedREK: Retrieval-Based Editing for Medical LLMs with Key-Aware Prompts [70.64143198545031]
We propose MedREK, a retrieval-based editing framework that integrates a shared query-key module for precise matching with an attention-based prompt encoder for informative guidance.<n>Our results on various medical benchmarks demonstrate that our MedREK achieves superior performance across different core metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T12:50:33Z) - Exploring the Capabilities of LLM Encoders for Image-Text Retrieval in Chest X-rays [8.019362739504087]
Vision-language pretraining has advanced image-text alignment, yet progress in radiology remains constrained by the heterogeneity of clinical reports.<n>We ask whether large language model (LLM) encoders can provide robust clinical representations that transfer across diverse styles.<n>We introduce LLM2VEC4CXR, a domain-adapted encoder for chest X-ray reports, and LLM2CLIP4CXR, a dual-tower framework that couples this encoder with a vision backbone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-17T09:44:59Z) - Automating Expert-Level Medical Reasoning Evaluation of Large Language Models [26.702477426812333]
We introduce MedThink-Bench, a benchmark for rigorous, explainable, and scalable assessment of large language models' medical reasoning.<n>We also propose LLM-w-Ref, a novel evaluation framework that leverages fine-grained rationales and LLM-as-a-Judge mechanisms.<n>Overall, MedThink-Bench offers a foundational tool for evaluating LLMs' medical reasoning, advancing their safe and responsible deployment in clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T17:58:26Z) - Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z) - MedHallBench: A New Benchmark for Assessing Hallucination in Medical Large Language Models [0.0]
Medical Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated potential in healthcare applications.<n>Their propensity for hallucinations presents substantial risks to patient care.<n>This paper introduces MedHallBench, a comprehensive benchmark framework for evaluating and mitigating hallucinations in MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-25T16:51:29Z) - Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Medical Question Answering [70.44269982045415]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs)
We introduce Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (MedRGB) that provides various supplementary elements to four medical QA datasets.
Our experimental results reveals current models' limited ability to handle noise and misinformation in the retrieved documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-14T06:19:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.