When Does Multimodal Learning Help in Healthcare? A Benchmark on EHR and Chest X-Ray Fusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23614v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 02:38:35 GMT
• Title: When Does Multimodal Learning Help in Healthcare? A Benchmark on EHR and Chest X-Ray Fusion
• Authors: Kejing Yin, Haizhou Xu, Wenfang Yao, Chen Liu, Zijie Chen, Yui Haang Cheung, William K. Cheung, Jing Qin,
• Abstract summary: Machine learning holds promise for advancing clinical decision support, yet it remains unclear when multimodal learning truly helps in practice.<n>We conduct a benchmark of multimodal fusion between Electronic Health Records (EHR) and chest X-rays (CXR) on standardized cohorts from MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-CXR.<n>Our study reveals several key insights, including how different fusion strategies compare, how robust existing methods are to missing modalities, and whether multimodal models achieve algorithmic fairness.
• Score: 16.683852533321666
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning holds promise for advancing clinical decision support, yet it remains unclear when multimodal learning truly helps in practice, particularly under modality missingness and fairness constraints. In this work, we conduct a systematic benchmark of multimodal fusion between Electronic Health Records (EHR) and chest X-rays (CXR) on standardized cohorts from MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-CXR, aiming to answer four fundamental questions: when multimodal fusion improves clinical prediction, how different fusion strategies compare, how robust existing methods are to missing modalities, and whether multimodal models achieve algorithmic fairness. Our study reveals several key insights. Multimodal fusion improves performance when modalities are complete, with gains concentrating in diseases that require complementary information from both EHR and CXR. While cross-modal learning mechanisms capture clinically meaningful dependencies beyond simple concatenation, the rich temporal structure of EHR introduces strong modality imbalance that architectural complexity alone cannot overcome. Under realistic missingness, multimodal benefits rapidly degrade unless models are explicitly designed to handle incomplete inputs. Moreover, multimodal fusion does not inherently improve fairness, with subgroup disparities mainly arising from unequal sensitivity across demographic groups. To support reproducible and extensible evaluation, we further release a flexible benchmarking toolkit that enables plug-and-play integration of new models and datasets. Together, this work provides actionable guidance on when multimodal learning helps, when it fails, and why, laying the foundation for developing clinically deployable multimodal systems that are both effective and reliable. The open-source toolkit can be found at https://github.com/jakeykj/CareBench.

Related papers

• Learning Contrastive Multimodal Fusion with Improved Modality Dropout for Disease Detection and Prediction [17.717216490402482]
  We propose a novel multimodal learning framework that integrates enhanced modalities dropout and contrastive learning.<n>We validate our framework on large-scale clinical datasets for disease detection and prediction tasks.<n>Our findings highlight the effectiveness, efficiency, and generalizability of our approach for multimodal learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T18:12:12Z)
• CLIMD: A Curriculum Learning Framework for Imbalanced Multimodal Diagnosis [21.001994821490644]
  We propose a Curriculum Learning framework for Imbalanced Multimodal Diagnosis (CLIMD)<n>Specifically, we first design multimodal curriculum measurer that combines intra-modal confidence and inter-modal complementarity, to enable the model to focus on key samples.<n>As a plug-and-play CL framework, CLIMD can be easily integrated into other models, offering a promising path for improving multimodal disease diagnosis accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T05:25:12Z)
• Continual Multimodal Contrastive Learning [99.53621521696051]
  Multimodal Contrastive Learning (MCL) advances in aligning different modalities and generating multimodal representations in a joint space.<n>However, a critical yet often overlooked challenge remains: multimodal data is rarely collected in a single process, and training from scratch is computationally expensive.<n>In this paper, we formulate CMCL through two specialized principles of stability and plasticity.<n>We theoretically derive a novel optimization-based method, which projects updated gradients from dual sides onto subspaces where any gradient is prevented from interfering with the previously learned knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T07:57:08Z)
• MIND: Modality-Informed Knowledge Distillation Framework for Multimodal Clinical Prediction Tasks [50.98856172702256]
  We propose the Modality-INformed knowledge Distillation (MIND) framework, a multimodal model compression approach.<n>MIND transfers knowledge from ensembles of pre-trained deep neural networks of varying sizes into a smaller multimodal student.<n>We evaluate MIND on binary and multilabel clinical prediction tasks using time series data and chest X-ray images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T08:50:00Z)
• PAL: Prompting Analytic Learning with Missing Modality for Multi-Modal Class-Incremental Learning [42.00851701431368]
  Multi-modal class-incremental learning (MMCIL) seeks to leverage multi-modal data, such as audio-visual and image-text pairs.<n>A critical challenge remains: the issue of missing modalities during incremental learning phases.<n>We propose PAL, a novel exemplar-free framework tailored to MMCIL under missing-modality scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T08:04:04Z)
• HyperMM : Robust Multimodal Learning with Varying-sized Inputs [4.377889826841039]
  HyperMM is an end-to-end framework designed for learning with varying-sized inputs. We introduce a novel strategy for training a universal feature extractor using a conditional hypernetwork. We experimentally demonstrate the advantages of our method in two tasks: Alzheimer's disease detection and breast cancer classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T12:13:18Z)
• Automated Ensemble Multimodal Machine Learning for Healthcare [52.500923923797835]
  We introduce a multimodal framework, AutoPrognosis-M, that enables the integration of structured clinical (tabular) data and medical imaging using automated machine learning. AutoPrognosis-M incorporates 17 imaging models, including convolutional neural networks and vision transformers, and three distinct multimodal fusion strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T17:46:38Z)
• HEALNet: Multimodal Fusion for Heterogeneous Biomedical Data [10.774128925670183]
  This paper presents the Hybrid Early-fusion Attention Learning Network (HEALNet), a flexible multimodal fusion architecture. We conduct multimodal survival analysis on Whole Slide Images and Multi-omic data on four cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HEALNet achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to other end-to-end trained fusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T17:06:26Z)
• Deep Equilibrium Multimodal Fusion [88.04713412107947]
  Multimodal fusion integrates the complementary information present in multiple modalities and has gained much attention recently. We propose a novel deep equilibrium (DEQ) method towards multimodal fusion via seeking a fixed point of the dynamic multimodal fusion process. Experiments on BRCA, MM-IMDB, CMU-MOSI, SUN RGB-D, and VQA-v2 demonstrate the superiority of our DEQ fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T03:02:20Z)
• Learning Unseen Modality Interaction [54.23533023883659]
  Multimodal learning assumes all modality combinations of interest are available during training to learn cross-modal correspondences. We pose the problem of unseen modality interaction and introduce a first solution. It exploits a module that projects the multidimensional features of different modalities into a common space with rich information preserved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T10:53:10Z)
• Provable Dynamic Fusion for Low-Quality Multimodal Data [94.39538027450948]
  Dynamic multimodal fusion emerges as a promising learning paradigm. Despite its widespread use, theoretical justifications in this field are still notably lacking. This paper provides theoretical understandings to answer this question under a most popular multimodal fusion framework from the generalization perspective. A novel multimodal fusion framework termed Quality-aware Multimodal Fusion (QMF) is proposed, which can improve the performance in terms of classification accuracy and model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T08:32:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.