ARGUS: Seeing the Influence of Narrative Features on Persuasion in Argumentative Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24109v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:47:57 GMT
• Title: ARGUS: Seeing the Influence of Narrative Features on Persuasion in Argumentative Texts
• Authors: Sara Nabhani, Federico Pianzola, Khalid Al-Khatib, Malvina Nissim,
• Abstract summary: We present ARGUS, a framework for studying the impact of narration on persuasion in argumentative discourse.<n>ARGUS introduces a new ChangeMyView corpus annotated for story presence and six key narrative features.
• Score: 17.10911464536343
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Can narratives make arguments more persuasive? And to this end, which narrative features matter most? Although stories are often seen as powerful tools for persuasion, their specific role in online, unstructured argumentation remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present ARGUS, a framework for studying the impact of narration on persuasion in argumentative discourse. ARGUS introduces a new ChangeMyView corpus annotated for story presence and six key narrative features, integrating insights from two established theoretical frameworks that capture both textual narrative features and their effects on recipients. Leveraging both encoder-based classifiers and zero-shot large language models (LLMs), ARGUS identifies stories and narrative features and applies them at scale to examine how different narrative dimensions influence persuasion success in online argumentation.

Related papers

• Detecting Winning Arguments with Large Language Models and Persuasion Strategies [7.089321248525487]
  This work investigates the role of persuasion strategies in determining the persuasiveness of a text.<n>We conduct experiments on three annotated argument datasets: Winning Arguments (built from the Change My View subreddit), Anthropic/Persuasion, and Persuasion for Good.<n>Results show that strategy-guided reasoning improves the prediction of persuasiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T18:30:15Z)
• Mapping News Narratives Using LLMs and Narrative-Structured Text Embeddings [0.0]
  We introduce a numerical narrative representation grounded in structuralist linguistic theory. We extract the actants using an open-source LLM and integrate them into a Narrative-Structured Text Embedding. We demonstrate the analytical insights of the method on the example of 5000 full-text news articles from Al Jazeera and The Washington Post on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T14:15:30Z)
• Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? [114.34140090869175]
  This paper investigates the capability of LLMs in storytelling, focusing on narrative development and plot progression. We introduce a novel computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. We show that explicit integration of discourse features can enhance storytelling, as is demonstrated by over 40% improvement in neural storytelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:02:49Z)
• Discovering collective narratives shifts in online discussions [3.6231158294409482]
  We propose a systematic narrative discovery framework that fills the gap by combining change point detection, semantic role labeling (SRL), and automatic aggregation of narrative fragments into narrative networks. We evaluate our model with synthetic and empirical data two-Twitter corpora about COVID-19 and 2017 French Election. Results demonstrate that our approach can recover major narrative shifts that correspond to the major events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T15:00:04Z)
• DeltaScore: Fine-Grained Story Evaluation with Perturbations [69.33536214124878]
  We introduce DELTASCORE, a novel methodology that employs perturbation techniques for the evaluation of nuanced story aspects. Our central proposition posits that the extent to which a story excels in a specific aspect (e.g., fluency) correlates with the magnitude of its susceptibility to particular perturbations. We measure the quality of an aspect by calculating the likelihood difference between pre- and post-perturbation states using pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T23:45:54Z)
• Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of Arguments in Online Discussion [52.49981085431061]
  Enhancing people's ability to write persuasive arguments could contribute to the effectiveness and civility in online communication. We derived four design goals for a tool that helps users improve the persuasiveness of arguments in online discussions. Persua is an interactive visual system that provides example-based guidance on persuasive strategies to enhance the persuasiveness of arguments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:07:53Z)
• Exploring Discourse Structures for Argument Impact Classification [48.909640432326654]
  This paper empirically shows that the discourse relations between two arguments along the context path are essential factors for identifying the persuasive power of an argument. We propose DisCOC to inject and fuse the sentence-level structural information with contextualized features derived from large-scale language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T06:49:19Z)
• Paragraph-level Commonsense Transformers with Recurrent Memory [77.4133779538797]
  We train a discourse-aware model that incorporates paragraph-level information to generate coherent commonsense inferences from narratives. Our results show that PARA-COMET outperforms the sentence-level baselines, particularly in generating inferences that are both coherent and novel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T05:24:12Z)
• What Changed Your Mind: The Roles of Dynamic Topics and Discourse in Argumentation Process [78.4766663287415]
  This paper presents a study that automatically analyzes the key factors in argument persuasiveness. We propose a novel neural model that is able to track the changes of latent topics and discourse in argumentative conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T04:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.