Sustainable Code Generation Using Large Language Models: A Systematic Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00989v2
• Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 07:55:51 GMT
• Title: Sustainable Code Generation Using Large Language Models: A Systematic Literature Review
• Authors: Sabiya Banu Masthan Ali, Oussema Kirmani, Syed Muhammad Danish, Gautam Srivastava,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in software engineering to generate, complete, translate, and fix code.<n>This paper examines existing research on the sustainability of code generated by LLMs.
• Score: 20.12025491042057
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in software engineering to generate, complete, translate, and fix code, improving developer productivity. While most research focuses on the energy consumption and carbon emissions of model training and inference, far less attention has been given to the sustainability of the code these models produce. The efficiency of generated code affects the long-term environmental impact of software systems. Inefficient code can increase CPU usage, memory consumption, execution time, and overall energy use during deployment and operation. As LLM-generated code becomes more common in real-world projects, even small inefficiencies can lead to high environmental costs over time. This paper examines existing research on the sustainability of code generated by LLMs. We conduct a systematic literature review to analyze selected primary studies and investigate the extent to which LLMs are capable of producing sustainable code. In addition, we examine how sustainability is defined and measured in this context, including the metrics and evaluation strategies used to assess energy efficiency and resource usage. We also explore whether techniques such as fine-tuning and prompt engineering influence the sustainability of generated code. Through a structured analysis of the selected studies, we categorize research efforts based on their methodological approaches, evaluation practices, and experimental settings. The findings indicate that research in this area remains relatively limited and fragmented, with no widely accepted framework for measuring or benchmarking the sustainability of LLM-generated code. These observations highlight the need for clearer definitions, standardized evaluation methods, and systematic research to support environmentally friendly AI-assisted software engineering.

Related papers

• Environment-Aware Code Generation: How far are We? [52.69113158357018]
  It is unclear whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably generate executable code tailored to a user's specific environment.<n>We present the first systematic study of Environment-Aware Code Generation (EACG), where generated code must be functionally correct and directly executable under arbitrary software configurations.<n>Our results show that current LLMs struggle with environment-specific code generation, while our adaptations improve environment compatibility and executability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T04:58:15Z)
• From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z)
• MERA Code: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Code Generation Across Tasks [56.34018316319873]
  We propose MERA Code, a benchmark for evaluating code for the latest code generation LLMs in Russian.<n>This benchmark includes 11 evaluation tasks that span 8 programming languages.<n>We evaluate open LLMs and frontier API models, analyzing their limitations in terms of practical coding tasks in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T14:31:33Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Tasks [75.97299249823972]
  This paper introduces a curated database comprising over 100 questions derived from authentic, production-oriented engineering scenarios.<n>Using this dataset, we evaluate four state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our results show that LLMs demonstrate strengths in basic temporal and structural reasoning but struggle significantly with abstract reasoning, formal modeling, and context-sensitive engineering logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T14:05:23Z)
• Can We Make Code Green? Understanding Trade-Offs in LLMs vs. Human Code Optimizations [45.243401722182554]
  Large language models (LLMs) claim to assist developers in optimizing code for performance and energy efficiency.<n>This work focuses on software written in Matlab-widely used in both academia and industry for scientific and engineering applications.<n>We analyze energy-focused optimization on 400 scripts across 100 top GitHub repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T00:27:29Z)
• Prompt engineering and its implications on the energy consumption of Large Language Models [4.791072577881446]
  Large language models (LLMs) in software engineering pose severe challenges regarding computational resources, data centers, and carbon emissions.<n>In this paper, we investigate how prompt engineering techniques (PETs) can impact the carbon emission of the Llama 3 model for the code generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T11:49:31Z)
• A Survey on Evaluating Large Language Models in Code Generation Tasks [30.256255254277914]
  This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current methods and metrics used to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in code generation tasks.<n>With the rapid growth in demand for automated software development, LLMs have demonstrated significant potential in the field of code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T12:56:06Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [92.62952504133926]
  This study evaluated the performance of three leading closed-source LLMs and six popular open-source LLMs on three commonly used benchmarks.<n>We developed a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes and analyzed the root cause for common bug types.<n>We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• The Price of Prompting: Profiling Energy Use in Large Language Models Inference [5.254805405012678]
  This paper introduces MELODI, a framework crafted to monitor and analyze the energy consumed during large language models inference processes. The dataset, generated using MELODI, encompasses a broad spectrum of LLM deployment frameworks, multiple language models, and extensive prompt datasets. Our findings indicate substantial disparities in energy efficiency, suggesting ample scope for optimization and adoption of sustainable measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T12:16:28Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation [9.555952109820392]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks. This survey aims to bridge the gap between academia and practical development by providing a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T17:48:15Z)
• Towards Coarse-to-Fine Evaluation of Inference Efficiency for Large Language Models [95.96734086126469]
  Large language models (LLMs) can serve as the assistant to help users accomplish their jobs, and also support the development of advanced applications. For the wide application of LLMs, the inference efficiency is an essential concern, which has been widely studied in existing work. We perform a detailed coarse-to-fine analysis of the inference performance of various code libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T15:57:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.