SoK: Is Sustainable the New Usable? Debunking The Myth of Fundamental Incompatibility Between Security and Sustainability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01958v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:08:13 GMT
• Title: SoK: Is Sustainable the New Usable? Debunking The Myth of Fundamental Incompatibility Between Security and Sustainability
• Authors: Maxwell Keleher, David Barrera, Sonia Chiasson,
• Abstract summary: We analyze 29 papers and distill 155 sustainability guidelines into 12 sustainability themes.<n>We find little evidence of a fundamental tension between these two domains.<n>Building on these parallels, we argue that the usable security community is well-positioned to integrate sustainability considerations.
• Score: 3.400238803866609
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Every year, millions of functional systems become e-waste because users are pressured to send their systems to landfills due to a lack of vendor support and difficulty in recycling. Vendors cite ``cybersecurity'' as the driver for short product support periods, leading to a prevalent, but uninterrogated, belief that cybersecurity and environmental sustainability are fundamentally contradictory; i.e., it is difficult, if not impossible, to build products that are secure, long-lasting, and reusable. To understand the nuanced relationship between security and sustainability, we systematically analyze 29 papers and distill 155 sustainability guidelines into 12 sustainability themes. These themes enable us to compare the sustainable HCI and sustainable software engineering guidance with that of cybersecurity, identifying points of alignment and tension. We find little evidence of a fundamental tension between these two domains; the few instances of tension can be mitigated through thoughtful consideration of security and sustainability objectives. We also find that sustainability, like usable security, struggles with the myth of users as the weakest link and the individualization of responsibility. Building on these parallels, we argue that the usable security community is well-positioned to integrate sustainability considerations, as both fields share challenges in shifting responsibility from individuals to systemic design.

Related papers

• Impostor Phenomenon as Human Debt: A Challenge to the Future of Software Engineering [46.44607910934403]
  The Impostor Phenomenon (IP) impacts a significant portion of the Software Engineering workforce.<n>Similar to technical debt, Human Debt accumulates due to gaps in psychological safety and inclusive support within socio-technical ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T13:26:38Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Sustainability Flags for the Identification of Sustainability Posts in Q&A Platforms [0.19999259391104385]
  We introduce the notion of sustainability flags as pointers in relevant discussions.<n>This study further evaluates the effectiveness of these flags in identifying sustainability within cloud architecture posts.<n>Preliminary results suggest that the use of flags results in classifying fewer posts as sustainability-related compared to a control group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T15:06:04Z)
• Towards a Knowledge Base of Common Sustainability Weaknesses in Green Software Development [9.521952718902973]
  In this paper, we motivate the need for the development of a standard knowledge base of commonly occurring sustainability weaknesses in code.<n>We demonstrate why existing knowledge regarding software weaknesses cannot be re-tagged "as is" to sustainability without significant due diligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T14:03:58Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Using Sustainability Impact Scores for Software Architecture Evaluation [5.33605239628904]
  We present an improved version of the Sustainability Impact Score (SIS)<n>The SIS facilitates the identification and quantification of trade-offs in terms of their sustainability impact.<n>Our study reveals that technical quality concerns have significant, often unrecognized impacts across sustainability dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T15:00:45Z)
• Towards Robust Stability Prediction in Smart Grids: GAN-based Approach under Data Constraints and Adversarial Challenges [53.2306792009435]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for detecting instability in smart grids using only stable data.<n>It achieves up to 98.1% accuracy in predicting grid stability and 98.9% in detecting adversarial attacks.<n>Implemented on a single-board computer, it enables real-time decision-making with an average response time of under 7ms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:48:25Z)
• Explainable Natural Language Processing for Corporate Sustainability Analysis [26.267508407180465]
  The concept of corporate sustainability is complex due to the diverse and intricate nature of firm operations. Corporate sustainability assessments are plagued by subjectivity both within data that reflect corporate sustainability efforts and the analysts evaluating them. We argue that Explainable Natural Language Processing (XNLP) can significantly enhance corporate sustainability analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T08:27:51Z)
• Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output: Benchmarking Cross-modality Safety Alignment of Large Vision-Language Model [73.8765529028288]
  We introduce a novel safety alignment challenge called Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output (SIUO) to evaluate cross-modality safety alignment.<n>To empirically investigate this problem, we developed the SIUO, a cross-modality benchmark encompassing 9 critical safety domains, such as self-harm, illegal activities, and privacy violations.<n>Our findings reveal substantial safety vulnerabilities in both closed- and open-source LVLMs, underscoring the inadequacy of current models to reliably interpret and respond to complex, real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T16:14:15Z)
• GreenDB -- A Dataset and Benchmark for Extraction of Sustainability Information of Consumer Goods [58.31888171187044]
  We present GreenDB, a database that collects products from European online shops on a weekly basis. As proxy for the products' sustainability, it relies on sustainability labels, which are evaluated by experts. We present initial results demonstrating that ML models trained with our data can reliably predict the sustainability label of products.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T19:59:42Z)
• Sustaining Security and Safety in ICT: A Quest for Terminology, Objectives, and Limits [0.0]
  Security and safety are intertwined concepts in the world of computing. In recent years, the terms "sustainable security" and "sustainable safety" came into fashion. This paper dissects the idea of sustainable safety and security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T07:46:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.