Sustainability Flags for the Identification of Sustainability Posts in Q&A Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02695v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 15:06:04 GMT
• Title: Sustainability Flags for the Identification of Sustainability Posts in Q&A Platforms
• Authors: Sahar Ahmadisakha, Lech Bialek, Mohamed Soliman, Vasilios Andrikopoulos,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the notion of sustainability flags as pointers in relevant discussions.<n>This study further evaluates the effectiveness of these flags in identifying sustainability within cloud architecture posts.<n>Preliminary results suggest that the use of flags results in classifying fewer posts as sustainability-related compared to a control group.
• Score: 0.19999259391104385
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, sustainability in software systems has gained significant attention, especially with the rise of cloud computing and the shift towards cloud-based architectures. This shift has intensified the need to identify sustainability in architectural discussions to take informed architectural decisions. One source to see these decisions is in online Q&A forums among practitioners' discussions. However, recognizing sustainability concepts within software practitioners' discussions remains challenging due to the lack of clear and distinct guidelines for this task. To address this issue, we introduce the notion of sustainability flags as pointers in relevant discussions, developed through thematic analysis of multiple sustainability best practices from cloud providers. This study further evaluates the effectiveness of these flags in identifying sustainability within cloud architecture posts, using a controlled experiment. Preliminary results suggest that the use of flags results in classifying fewer posts as sustainability-related compared to a control group, with moderately higher certainty and significantly improved performance. Moreover, sustainability flags are perceived as more useful and understandable than relying solely on definitions for identifying sustainability.

Related papers

• LaSER: Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval [74.72139580745511]
  LaSER is a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of retrievers.<n>Our method successfully combines the reasoning depth of explicit CoT pipelines with the inference efficiency of standard dense retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T04:11:18Z)
• STaR: Towards Cognitive Table Reasoning via Slow-Thinking Large Language Models [12.745473719032026]
  We present STaR (slow-thinking for table reasoning), a new framework achieving cognitive table reasoning.<n> STaR explicitly modeling step-by-step thinking and uncertainty-aware inference.<n>Experiments on benchmarks demonstrate that STaR achieves superior performance and enhanced reasoning stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T12:34:17Z)
• Explainable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis on State-Aware Reasoning Dynamics [69.00587226225232]
  We introduce a state-aware transition framework that abstracts CoT trajectories into structured latent dynamics.<n>To characterize the global structure of reasoning, we model their progression as a Markov chain.<n>This abstraction supports a range of analyses, including semantic role identification, temporal pattern visualization, and consistency evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T18:53:31Z)
• A Survey on Latent Reasoning [100.54120559169735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities.<n>CoT reasoning that verbalizes intermediate steps limits the model's expressive bandwidth.<n>Latent reasoning tackles this bottleneck by performing multi-step inference entirely in the model's continuous hidden state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T17:29:07Z)
• Seek in the Dark: Reasoning via Test-Time Instance-Level Policy Gradient in Latent Space [82.75174050101108]
  We introduce LatentSeek, a framework that enhances reasoning through Test-Time Instance-level Adaptation (TTIA) within the model's latent space.<n>LatentSeek is evaluated on a range of reasoning benchmarks, including GSM8K, MATH-500, and AIME2024.<n>Results show that LatentSeek consistently outperforms strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T16:26:02Z)
• A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond [88.5807076505261]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance gains by scaling up the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning during inference.<n>A growing concern lies in their tendency to produce excessively long reasoning traces.<n>This inefficiency introduces significant challenges for training, inference, and real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:36:30Z)
• Using Sustainability Impact Scores for Software Architecture Evaluation [5.33605239628904]
  We present an improved version of the Sustainability Impact Score (SIS)<n>The SIS facilitates the identification and quantification of trade-offs in terms of their sustainability impact.<n>Our study reveals that technical quality concerns have significant, often unrecognized impacts across sustainability dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T15:00:45Z)
• Deep End-to-End Survival Analysis with Temporal Consistency [49.77103348208835]
  We present a novel Survival Analysis algorithm designed to efficiently handle large-scale longitudinal data. A central idea in our method is temporal consistency, a hypothesis that past and future outcomes in the data evolve smoothly over time. Our framework uniquely incorporates temporal consistency into large datasets by providing a stable training signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T11:37:09Z)
• Mining for sustainability in cloud architecture among the discussions of software practitioners: building a dataset [0.0]
  We utilize software repository mining techniques to examine 192 discussions among practitioners on the Software Engineering forum of the StackExchange platform. Our initial findings indicate practitioners mainly focus on design aspects while avoiding complex activities like evaluation and maintenance. Technical sustainability is emphasized, while the economic dimension has the most discussions exclusively focused on it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T18:54:27Z)
• Clearing the Path for Software Sustainability [0.0]
  This paper outlines key challenges identified in literature based on findings from a tertiary study. Confusion regarding the definition of software sustainability, uncertainty about when to consider sustainability in software development, lack of assessment metrics and tools, narrow perspectives on sustainability in software systems, insufficient awareness and education, and a lack of serious considerations in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T15:24:24Z)
• Enhancing Systematic Decompositional Natural Language Inference Using Informal Logic [51.967603572656266]
  We introduce a consistent and theoretically grounded approach to annotating decompositional entailment. We find that our new dataset, RDTE, has a substantially higher internal consistency (+9%) than prior decompositional entailment datasets. We also find that training an RDTE-oriented entailment classifier via knowledge distillation and employing it in an entailment tree reasoning engine significantly improves both accuracy and proof quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T18:55:17Z)
• Assessing the Sustainability and Trustworthiness of Federated Learning Models [6.821579077084753]
  The European Commission's AI-HLEG group has highlighted the importance of sustainable AI for trustworthy AI.<n>This work introduces the sustainability pillar to the trustworthy FL taxonomy, making this work the first to address all AI-HLEG requirements.<n>An algorithm is developed to evaluate the trustworthiness of FL models, incorporating sustainability considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T13:14:43Z)
• Broadening the perspective for sustainable AI: Comprehensive sustainability criteria and indicators for AI systems [0.0]
  This paper takes steps towards substantiating the call for an overarching perspective on "sustainable AI" It presents the SCAIS Framework which contains a set 19 sustainability criteria for sustainable AI and 67 indicators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T18:00:55Z)
• Continual Multimodal Knowledge Graph Construction [62.77243705682985]
  Current Multimodal Knowledge Graph Construction (MKGC) models struggle with the real-world dynamism of continuously emerging entities and relations. This study introduces benchmarks aimed at fostering the development of the continual MKGC domain. We introduce MSPT framework, designed to surmount the shortcomings of existing MKGC approaches during multimedia data processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T14:58:28Z)
• Supporting Optimal Phase Space Reconstructions Using Neural Network Architecture for Time Series Modeling [68.8204255655161]
  We propose an artificial neural network with a mechanism to implicitly learn the phase spaces properties. Our approach is either as competitive as or better than most state-of-the-art strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T21:04:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.