HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response Imitation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03303v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 20:26:28 GMT
• Title: HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response Imitation
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel training framework, HumanLM, which builds user simulators that accurately reflect real users.<n>HumanLM generates natural-language latent states that align with ground-truth responses through reinforcement learning.<n>For extensive evaluation, we develop Humanual, a comprehensive benchmark for simulating real users based on public data.
• Score: 84.89761487596844
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate how specific users respond to a given context, enabling more user-centric applications that rely on user feedback. However, existing user simulators mostly imitate surface-level patterns and language styles, which fail to reflect the underlying states of real users (e.g., beliefs and emotions). To address these limitations, we propose a novel training framework, HumanLM, which builds user simulators that accurately reflect real users. Our key insight is that, in addition to generating responses, the model should generate natural-language latent states that align with ground-truth responses through reinforcement learning. These latent states correspond to a set of psychologically grounded state dimensions that drive how real users respond. HumanLM further synthesizes these aligned latent states into responses that accurately represent real users. For extensive evaluation, we develop Humanual, a comprehensive benchmark for simulating real users based on public data. Humanual consists of six large-scale datasets with 26k users and 216k responses in total, spanning diverse tasks such as generating user responses to daily life issues, political blogs, and chat sessions with LLM assistants. Across datasets, HumanLM significantly outperforms alternative approaches, achieving an average relative improvement of 16.3% in alignment scores from an LLM judge. In a real-time simulation study with 111 participants, HumanLM achieves the highest similarity to real user responses and competitive human-likeness scores.

Related papers

• Learning User Simulators with Turing Rewards [32.70383881352914]
  Learning to simulate human users in interactive settings could advance the training of agent assistants, evaluation of personalization systems, and more.<n>We propose Turing-RL: a Turing-Test-based reinforcement learning approach for training user simulator models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T17:58:48Z)
• Beyond Cooperative Simulators: Generating Realistic User Personas for Robust Evaluation of LLM Agents [28.85410475505536]
  Persona Policies (PPol) is a control layer that induces realistic behavioral variation in user simulators.<n>PPol produces a diverse population of human-like personas for any task in the domain.<n>Agents trained with PPol are more robust to challenging, out-of-distribution behaviors, improving task success by +17% relative to training only on existing simulated interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T02:16:51Z)
• Measuring and Mitigating the Distributional Gap Between Real and Simulated User Behaviors [61.610957638373826]
  We introduce a method to measure the distributional gap between real and simulated user behaviors.<n>Given a dataset of real and simulated conversations, our method extracts representations of user behavior from each conversation.<n>We show that most simulators behave similarly, while a few stand apart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T15:09:25Z)
• LifeSim: Long-Horizon User Life Simulator for Personalized Assistant Evaluation [63.37419733369833]
  LifeSim is a user simulator that models user cognition through the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model.<n>LifeSim-Eval covers 8 life domains and 1,200 diverse scenarios, and adopts a multi-turn interactive method to assess models' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T16:49:34Z)
• Mind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic Tasks [101.69142591891234]
  We formalize the Sim2Real gap in user simulation and present the first study running the full $$-bench protocol with real humans.<n> Behaviorally, LLM simulators are excessively cooperative, stylistically uniform, and lack realistic frustration or ambiguity.<n>These findings highlight the importance of human validation when using LLM-based user simulators in the agent development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T19:12:31Z)
• SimBench: Benchmarking the Ability of Large Language Models to Simulate Human Behaviors [58.87134689752605]
  We introduce SimBench, the first large-scale, standardized benchmark for a robust, reproducible science of LLM simulation.<n>We show that even the best LLMs today have limited simulation ability (score: 40.80/100), performance scales log-linearly with model size.<n>We demonstrate that simulation ability correlates most strongly with deep, knowledge-intensive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T13:14:38Z)
• Flipping the Dialogue: Training and Evaluating User Language Models [31.119620506835677]
  We introduce purpose-built User Language Models (User LMs)<n>User LMs are models post-trained to simulate human users in multi-turn conversations.<n>We show how User LMs align better with human behavior and achieve better simulation robustness than existing simulation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T01:04:36Z)
• SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants? [61.07963107032645]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in interactive applications.<n>Human evaluation remains the gold standard for assessing their performance in multi-turn conversations.<n>We introduce SimulatorArena, a benchmark of 909 annotated human-LLM conversations on two interactive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T23:17:44Z)
• Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit Profiles [37.43150003866563]
  We introduce the User Simulator with Implicit Profiles (USP), a framework that infers implicit user profiles from human-machine interactions to simulate personalized and realistic dialogues.<n>USP outperforms strong baselines in terms of authenticity and diversity while maintaining comparable consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T09:26:54Z)
• User Behavior Simulation with Large Language Model based Agents [116.74368915420065]
  We propose an LLM-based agent framework and design a sandbox environment to simulate real user behaviors. Based on extensive experiments, we find that the simulated behaviors of our method are very close to the ones of real humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T02:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.