Learning User Simulators with Turing Rewards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19336v2
• Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 03:03:06 GMT
• Title: Learning User Simulators with Turing Rewards
• Abstract summary: Learning to simulate human users in interactive settings could advance the training of agent assistants, evaluation of personalization systems, and more.<n>We propose Turing-RL: a Turing-Test-based reinforcement learning approach for training user simulator models.
• Score: 32.70383881352914
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Learning to simulate human users in interactive settings could advance the training of agent assistants, evaluation of personalization systems, research in the social sciences, and more. Existing approaches generally do so by training a large language model (LLM) to match a single ground truth response, either by maximizing the log probability or by using a similarity reward. We instead propose Turing-RL: a Turing-Test-based reinforcement learning approach for training user simulator models. Turing-RL uses a discriminative Turing reward with an LLM judge to score how indistinguishable a generated response is from the real user's given the user's history, and the user simulator LLM learns to produce responses indistinguishable from what the user could have said with such rewards. Across two different domains--conversational chat and Reddit forum discussion--we find that Turing-RL consistently outperforms baseline methods on both LLM and human evaluation metrics. Our study suggests that optimizing for indistinguishability, rather than response matching, is effective for learning user simulators.

Related papers

• Quantifying the Utility of User Simulators for Building Collaborative LLM Assistants [7.523995265564992]
  We show how simulator quality can be quantified in terms of its downstream utility.<n>We train LLM assistants via reinforcement learning against a spectrum of simulators.<n>As evaluation, we measure pairwise win rates in a user study with 283 participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T23:06:24Z)
• Measuring and Mitigating the Distributional Gap Between Real and Simulated User Behaviors [61.610957638373826]
  We introduce a method to measure the distributional gap between real and simulated user behaviors.<n>Given a dataset of real and simulated conversations, our method extracts representations of user behavior from each conversation.<n>We show that most simulators behave similarly, while a few stand apart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T15:09:25Z)
• Mind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic Tasks [101.69142591891234]
  We formalize the Sim2Real gap in user simulation and present the first study running the full $$-bench protocol with real humans.<n> Behaviorally, LLM simulators are excessively cooperative, stylistically uniform, and lack realistic frustration or ambiguity.<n>These findings highlight the importance of human validation when using LLM-based user simulators in the agent development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T19:12:31Z)
• Individual Turing Test: A Case Study of LLM-based Simulation Using Longitudinal Personal Data [54.145424717168794]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable human-like capabilities, yet their ability to replicate a specific individual remains under-explored.<n>This paper presents a case study to investigate LLM-based individual simulation with a volunteer-contributed archive of private messaging history spanning over ten years.<n>We propose the "Individual Turing Test" to evaluate whether acquaintances of the volunteer can correctly identify which response in a multi-candidate pool most plausibly comes from the volunteer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T21:46:27Z)
• HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response Imitation [84.89761487596844]
  We propose a novel training framework, HumanLM, which builds user simulators that accurately reflect real users.<n>HumanLM generates natural-language latent states that align with ground-truth responses through reinforcement learning.<n>For extensive evaluation, we develop Humanual, a comprehensive benchmark for simulating real users based on public data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T20:26:28Z)
• SimulatorArena: Are User Simulators Reliable Proxies for Multi-Turn Evaluation of AI Assistants? [61.07963107032645]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in interactive applications.<n>Human evaluation remains the gold standard for assessing their performance in multi-turn conversations.<n>We introduce SimulatorArena, a benchmark of 909 annotated human-LLM conversations on two interactive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T23:17:44Z)
• How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation [14.646529557978512]
  We analyze the limitations of using Large Language Models in constructing user simulators for Conversational Recommender System. Data leakage, which occurs in conversational history and the user simulator's replies, results in inflated evaluation results. We propose SimpleUserSim, employing a straightforward strategy to guide the topic toward the target items.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T04:21:06Z)
• USimAgent: Large Language Models for Simulating Search Users [33.17004578463697]
  We introduce a Large Language Models-based user search behavior simulator, USimAgent. The simulator can simulate users' querying, clicking, and stopping behaviors during search. Empirical investigation on a real user behavior dataset shows that the simulator outperforms existing methods in query generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T07:40:54Z)
• B-Pref: Benchmarking Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [84.41494283081326]
  We introduce B-Pref, a benchmark specially designed for preference-based RL. A key challenge with such a benchmark is providing the ability to evaluate candidate algorithms quickly. B-Pref alleviates this by simulating teachers with a wide array of irrationalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T17:32:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.