Invariant Causal Routing for Governing Social Norms in Online Market Economies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04534v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 19:20:53 GMT
• Title: Invariant Causal Routing for Governing Social Norms in Online Market Economies
• Authors: Xiangning Yu, Qirui Mi, Xiao Xue, Haoxuan Li, Yiwei Shi, Xiaowei Liu, Mengyue Yang,
• Abstract summary: We propose textbfInvariant Causal Routing (ICR), a causal governance framework that identifies policy-norm relations stable across heterogeneous environments.<n>ICR integrates counterfactual reasoning with invariant causal discovery to separate genuine causal effects from spurious correlations.<n>ICR yields more stable norms, smaller generalization gaps, and more concise rules than correlation or coverage baselines.
• Score: 11.455528258541127
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social norms are stable behavioral patterns that emerge endogenously within economic systems through repeated interactions among agents. In online market economies, such norms -- like fair exposure, sustained participation, and balanced reinvestment -- are critical for long-term stability. We aim to understand the causal mechanisms driving these emergent norms and to design principled interventions that can steer them toward desired outcomes. This is challenging because norms arise from countless micro-level interactions that aggregate into macro-level regularities, making causal attribution and policy transferability difficult. To address this, we propose \textbf{Invariant Causal Routing (ICR)}, a causal governance framework that identifies policy-norm relations stable across heterogeneous environments. ICR integrates counterfactual reasoning with invariant causal discovery to separate genuine causal effects from spurious correlations and to construct interpretable, auditable policy rules that remain effective under distribution shift. In heterogeneous agent simulations calibrated with real data, ICR yields more stable norms, smaller generalization gaps, and more concise rules than correlation or coverage baselines, demonstrating that causal invariance offers a principled and interpretable foundation for governance.

Related papers

• Human-like Social Compliance in Large Language Models: Unifying Sycophancy and Conformity through Signal Competition Dynamics [7.209622481153123]
  This study introduces the Signal Competition Mechanism, a unified framework validated by assessing behavioral correlations across 15 Large Language Models.<n>The transition to compliance is shown to be a deterministic process governed by a linear boundary, where the Social Emotional Signal effectively suppresses the Information Signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T06:57:42Z)
• Adaptive Accountability in Networked MAS: Tracing and Mitigating Emergent Norms at Scale [2.28438857884398]
  Large-scale networked multi-agent systems increasingly underpin critical infrastructure.<n>We introduce an adaptive accountability framework that traces responsibility flows through a lifecycle-aware audit ledger.<n>We prove a bounded-compromise theorem showing that whenever the expected intervention cost exceeds an adversary's payoff, the long-run proportion of compromised interactions is bounded by a constant strictly less than one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T02:04:47Z)
• From Linear Risk to Emergent Harm: Complexity as the Missing Core of AI Governance [0.0]
  Risk-based AI regulation promises proportional controls aligned with anticipated harms.<n>This paper argues that such frameworks often fail for structural reasons.<n>We propose a complexity-based framework for AI governance that treats regulation as intervention rather than control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T14:19:21Z)
• Norm-Governed Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Simulator-Coupled Environments:The Reinsurance Constrained Multi-Agent Simulation Process (R-CMASP) [0.0]
  We show how a domain-calibrated synthetic environment that governed multi-agent coordination yields more stable, coherent, and norm-adherent behaviour than deterministic automation.<n>Results suggest that regulated, simulator-driven decision environments are most naturally modelled as norm-governed, simulator-coupled multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T10:30:26Z)
• Rediscovering Entropy Regularization: Adaptive Coefficient Unlocks Its Potential for LLM Reinforcement Learning [55.59724323303857]
  We propose a framework that balances exploration and exploitation via three components: difficulty-aware coefficient allocation, initial-anchored target entropy, and dynamic global coefficient adjustment.<n>Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that AER consistently outperforms baselines, improving both reasoning accuracy and exploration capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T03:10:26Z)
• CTRLS: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Latent State-Transition [57.51370433303236]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enables large language models to break down complex problems into interpretable intermediate steps.<n>We introduce groundingS, a framework that formulates CoT reasoning as a Markov decision process (MDP) with latent state transitions.<n>We show improvements in reasoning accuracy, diversity, and exploration efficiency across benchmark reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T21:32:18Z)
• Answering Causal Queries at Layer 3 with DiscoSCMs-Embracing Heterogeneity [0.0]
  This paper advocates for the Distribution-consistency Structural Causal Models (DiscoSCM) framework as a pioneering approach to counterfactual inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T17:01:05Z)
• Normative Disagreement as a Challenge for Cooperative AI [56.34005280792013]
  We argue that typical cooperation-inducing learning algorithms fail to cooperate in bargaining problems. We develop a class of norm-adaptive policies and show in experiments that these significantly increase cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T11:37:42Z)
• Post-Contextual-Bandit Inference [57.88785630755165]
  Contextual bandit algorithms are increasingly replacing non-adaptive A/B tests in e-commerce, healthcare, and policymaking. They can both improve outcomes for study participants and increase the chance of identifying good or even best policies. To support credible inference on novel interventions at the end of the study, we still want to construct valid confidence intervals on average treatment effects, subgroup effects, or value of new policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T12:01:51Z)
• Dealing with Non-Stationarity in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Trust Region Decomposition [52.06086375833474]
  Non-stationarity is one thorny issue in multi-agent reinforcement learning. We introduce a $delta$-stationarity measurement to explicitly model the stationarity of a policy sequence. We propose a trust region decomposition network based on message passing to estimate the joint policy divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-21T14:46:50Z)
• GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Values [108.17309783125398]
  We show that effective estimation can still be achieved in important applications. Our approach is based on estimating a ratio that corrects for the discrepancy between the stationary and empirical distributions. The resulting algorithm, GenDICE, is straightforward and effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T00:27:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.