How Professional Visual Artists are Negotiating Generative AI in the Workplace

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04537v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 19:23:54 GMT
• Title: How Professional Visual Artists are Negotiating Generative AI in the Workplace
• Abstract summary: We conduct a survey of textit378 verified professional visual artists about how generative AI has impacted their careers and workplaces.<n>We find that most visual artists are strongly opposed to using generative AI (text or visual) and negotiate their inclusion in the workplace through a variety of textitrefusal strategies.<n>Visual artists report overwhelmingly negative impacts of generative AI on their workplaces, leading to added stress and reduced job opportunities.
• Score: 5.087553524832386
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI has been heavily critiqued by artists in both popular media and HCI scholarship. However, more work is needed to understand the impacts of generative AI on professional artists' workplaces and careers. In this paper, we conduct a survey of \textit{378 verified professional visual artists} about how generative AI has impacted their careers and workplaces. We find (1) most visual artists are strongly opposed to using generative AI (text or visual) and negotiate their inclusion in the workplace through a variety of \textit{refusal} strategies (2) there exist a range of factors in artists environments shaping their use of generative AI, including pressure from clients, bosses, and peers and (3) visual artists report overwhelmingly negative impacts of generative AI on their workplaces, leading to added stress and reduced job opportunities. In light of these findings, we encourage HCI researchers to contend more deeply with artists' desires not to use generative AI in the workplace.

Related papers

• ORIBA: Exploring LLM-Driven Role-Play Chatbot as a Creativity Support Tool for Original Character Artists [47.41729889651234]
  Generative AI (GAI) has raised ethical concerns in the visual artists community.<n>This paper explores how GAI can assist visual artists in developing original characters (OCs) while respecting their creative agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T10:29:35Z)
• The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Traditional Art Forms: A Disruption or Enhancement [0.0]
  We look at the ways that recent technologies like Geneversarative Adrial Networks and Diffusion Models are changing the fields of painting, sculpture, calligraphy, dance, music, and the arts of craft.<n>Using examples and data, we illustrate the ways that AI can democratize creative expression, improve productivity, and preserve cultural heritage.<n>We advocate for the development of ethical guidelines, collaborative approaches, and inclusive technology development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T16:37:04Z)
• Reflection on Data Storytelling Tools in the Generative AI Era from the Human-AI Collaboration Perspective [54.152639172274]
  Large-scale generative AI techniques have the potential to enhance data storytelling with their power in visual and narration generation.<n>We compare the collaboration patterns of the latest tools with those of earlier ones using a dedicated framework for understanding human-AI collaboration in data storytelling.<n>The benefits of these AI techniques and implications to human-AI collaboration are also revealed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T13:56:18Z)
• Exploring AI Writers: Technology, Impact, and Future Prospects [0.8702432681310401]
  The research examines how AI tools are reshaping news production, particularly in fields such as finance, sports, and natural disasters.<n>The findings reveal mixed perceptions among media students regarding the integration of AI into their profession, reflecting both optimism about efficiency gains and apprehensions over increased job market competition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T02:03:09Z)
• Expertise elevates AI usage: experimental evidence comparing laypeople and professional artists [1.5296069874080693]
  We compare the artistic capabilities of artists and laypeople using generative AI.<n>On average, artists produced more faithful and creative outputs than their lay counterparts.<n>While AI may ease content creation, professional expertise is still valuable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T18:53:21Z)
• "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
  We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools. Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation. Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Art [0.0]
  Generative AI tools are used to create art-like outputs and sometimes aid in the creative process. We surveyed 459 artists to investigate tension between artists' opinions on Generative AI art's potential utility and harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T20:22:46Z)
• AIxArtist: A First-Person Tale of Interacting with Artificial Intelligence to Escape Creative Block [20.96181205379132]
  The future of the arts and artificial intelligence (AI) is promising as technology advances. This workshop pictorial puts forward first-person research that shares interactions between an HCI researcher and AI. The paper explores two questions: How can AI support artists' creativity, and what does it mean to be explainable in this context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T13:15:29Z)
• Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive [26.675816750583138]
  generative AI can produce high-quality artistic media for visual arts, concept art, music, fiction, literature, video, and animation. We argue that generative AI is not the harbinger of art's demise, but rather is a new medium with its own distinct affordances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T04:27:51Z)
• Redefining Relationships in Music [55.478320310047785]
  We argue that AI tools will fundamentally reshape our music culture. People working in this space could decrease the possible negative impacts on the practice, consumption and meaning of music.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T19:44:32Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.