Token Taxes: mitigating AGI's economic risks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04555v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 19:38:29 GMT
• Title: Token Taxes: mitigating AGI's economic risks
• Authors: Lucas Irwin, Tung-Yu Wu, Fazl Barez,
• Abstract summary: Development of AGI threatens to erode government tax bases, lower living standards, and disempower citizens.<n>We argue that the economic risks posed by a post-AGI world can be effectively mitigated by token taxes.
• Score: 11.774079419317273
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The development of AGI threatens to erode government tax bases, lower living standards, and disempower citizens -- risks that make the 40-year stagnation of wages during the first industrial revolution look mild in comparison. While AI safety research has focused primarily on capability risks, comparatively little work has studied how to mitigate the economic risks of AGI. In this paper, we argue that the economic risks posed by a post-AGI world can be effectively mitigated by token taxes: usage-based surcharges on model inference applied at the point of sale. We situate token taxes within previous proposals for robot taxes and identify two key advantages: they are enforceable through existing compute governance infrastructure, and they capture value where AI is used rather than where models are hosted. For enforcement, we outline a staged audit pipeline -- black-box token verification, norm-based tax rates, and white-box audits. For impact, we highlight the need for agent-based modeling of token taxes' economic effects. Finally, we discuss alternative approaches including FLOP taxes, and how to prevent AI superpowers vetoing such measures.

Related papers

• Balancing Innovation and Oversight: AI in the U.S. Treasury and IRS: A Survey [0.0]
  The U.S. Department of Treasury, particularly the Internal Revenue Service, is adopting artificial intelligence (AI) to modernize tax administration.<n>Key initiatives include AI-powered chatbots, robotic process automation, machine learning for case selection, and advanced analytics for fraud prevention.<n>At the same time, the IRS is implementing governance measures to ensure responsible use of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T15:45:38Z)
• Language Models and Logic Programs for Trustworthy Financial Reasoning [50.73061215297832]
  Tax filing requires complex reasoning, combining application of overlapping rules with numerical calculations.<n>We propose an approach that integrates LLMs with a symbolic solver to calculate tax obligations.<n>We show how combining up-front translation of plain-text rules into formal logic programs, combined with intelligently retrieved exemplars for formal case representations, can dramatically improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T17:55:07Z)
• Can LLMs Identify Tax Abuse? [53.3007576756411]
  We investigate whether large language models can discover and analyze U.S. tax-minimization strategies.<n>We evaluate the most advanced LLMs on their ability to (1) interpret and verify tax strategies, (2) fill in gaps in partially specified strategies, and (3) generate complete, end-to-end strategies from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T15:15:45Z)
• TaxAgent: How Large Language Model Designs Fiscal Policy [22.859190941594296]
  This study introduces TaxAgent, a novel integration of large language models (LLMs) with agent-based modeling (ABM) to design adaptive tax policies.<n>In our macroeconomic simulation, heterogeneous H-Agents (households) simulate real-world taxpayer behaviors while the TaxAgent (government) utilizes LLMs to iteratively optimize tax rates, balancing equity and productivity.<n> Benchmarked against Saez Optimal Taxation, U.S. federal income taxes, and free markets, TaxAgent achieves superior equity-efficiency trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T13:06:19Z)
• A Taxation Perspective for Fair Re-ranking [61.946428892727795]
  We introduce a new fair re-ranking method named Tax-rank, which levies taxes based on the difference in utility between two items. Our model Tax-rank offers a superior tax policy for fair re-ranking, theoretically demonstrating both continuity and controllability over accuracy loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T08:21:29Z)
• AI Procurement Checklists: Revisiting Implementation in the Age of AI Governance [18.290959557311552]
  Public sector use of AI has been on the rise for the past decade, but only recently have efforts to enter it entered the cultural zeitgeist. While simple to articulate, promoting ethical and effective roll outs of AI systems in government is a notoriously elusive task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T01:45:38Z)
• On the Potential and Limitations of Few-Shot In-Context Learning to Generate Metamorphic Specifications for Tax Preparation Software [12.071874385139395]
  Nearly 50% of taxpayers filed their individual income taxes using tax software in the U.S. in FY22. This paper formulates the task of generating metamorphic specifications as a translation task between properties extracted from tax documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T18:12:28Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax Audit Models [73.24381010980606]
  This study examines issues of algorithmic fairness in the context of systems that inform tax audit selection by the IRS. We show how the use of more flexible machine learning methods for selecting audits may affect vertical equity. Our results have implications for the design of algorithmic tools across the public sector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T16:27:06Z)
• The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
  We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)
• The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policies [119.07163415116686]
  We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity. We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics. We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.