Analysis of Terms of Service on Social Media Platforms: Consent Challenges and Assessment Metrics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04701v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:47:28 GMT
• Title: Analysis of Terms of Service on Social Media Platforms: Consent Challenges and Assessment Metrics
• Authors: Yong-Bin Kang, Anthony McCosker,
• Abstract summary: Social media platforms typically obtain user consent through Terms of Service presented at account creation.<n>This study investigates whether consent-related information is clearly communicated within these ToS documents.<n>Using a combination of computational and qualitative analyses, we assess ToS from 13 major social media platforms.
• Score: 2.0304958287672448
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms typically obtain user consent through Terms of Service (ToS) presented at account creation, rather than through dedicated consent forms. This study investigates whether consent-related information is clearly communicated within these ToS documents. We propose and apply a three-dimensional consent evaluation framework encompassing Textual Accessibility, Semantic Transparency, and Interface Design as declared in ToS documents. Using a combination of computational and qualitative analyses, we assess ToS from 13 major social media platforms. Our findings reveal important shortcomings across platforms, including high linguistic complexity, widespread use of non-committal language, limited disclosure of data retention and sharing practices, and the absence of explicit interface-level commitments to granular or revocable consent. These results indicate that while consent is formally embedded in ToS, it is often presented in ways that constrain clarity and meaningful choice. Rather than treating ToS documents as informed consent instruments, this study positions them as consent-bearing documents whose design and content shape the conditions under which users are asked to agree to data practices. The proposed framework offers a systematic method for evaluating consent information within ToS in the absence of explicit consent forms and informs the design of clearer, more ethically robust consent mechanisms for data-intensive digital platforms.

Related papers

• From Clicks to Consensus: Collective Consent Assemblies for Data Governance [8.312192184427762]
  Notice and consent, the standard for collecting consent, has been criticized.<n>This paper argues that a collective approach to consent is worth exploring.<n>We propose collective consent, operationalized through consent assemblies, as one alternative framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T13:57:04Z)
• Doc-PP: Document Policy Preservation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [13.70855540464427]
  We introduce Doc-PP, a novel benchmark constructed from real-world reports requiring reasoning across heterogeneous visual and textual elements under strict non-disclosure policies.<n>Our evaluation highlights a systemic Reasoning-Induced Safety Gap: models frequently leak sensitive information when answers must be inferred through complex synthesis or aggregated across modalities.<n>We propose DVA, a structural inference framework that decouples reasoning from policy verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T13:45:39Z)
• Breaking the illusion: Automated Reasoning of GDPR Consent Violations [9.488261532697814]
  We present Cosmic, a novel automated framework for detecting consent-related privacy violations in web forms.<n>Cosmic detects 3384 violations on 94.1% of consent forms, covering key principles such as freely given consent purpose disclosure, and withdrawal options.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T05:22:00Z)
• Improving RAG Retrieval via Propositional Content Extraction: a Speech Act Theory Approach [0.0]
  This paper investigates whether extracting the underlying propositional content from user utterances can improve retrieval quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems.<n>We propose a practical method for automatically transforming queries into their propositional equivalents before embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T20:15:40Z)
• Few-shot Policy (de)composition in Conversational Question Answering [54.259440408606515]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic framework to detect policy compliance using large language models (LLMs) in a few-shot setting.<n>We show that our approach soundly reasons about policy compliance conversations by extracting sub-questions to be answered, assigning truth values from contextual information, and explicitly producing a set of logic statements from the given policies.<n>We apply this approach to the popular PCD and conversational machine reading benchmark, ShARC, and show competitive performance with no task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T08:40:15Z)
• Con-ReCall: Detecting Pre-training Data in LLMs via Contrastive Decoding [118.75567341513897]
  Existing methods typically analyze target text in isolation or solely with non-member contexts.<n>We propose Con-ReCall, a novel approach that leverages the asymmetric distributional shifts induced by member and non-member contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:10:38Z)
• Learning from Implicit User Feedback, Emotions and Demographic Information in Task-Oriented and Document-Grounded Dialogues [52.95506649193427]
  We introduce FEDI, the first English task-oriented and document-grounded dialogue dataset annotated with this information. Experiments with Flan-T5, GPT-2 and Llama 2 show a particularly positive impact on task completion and factual consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T14:52:26Z)
• $\ extit{Dial BeInfo for Faithfulness}$: Improving Factuality of Information-Seeking Dialogue via Behavioural Fine-Tuning [55.96744451743273]
  We introduce BeInfo, a method that applies behavioural tuning to aid information-seeking dialogue systems. We show that models tuned with BeInfo become considerably more faithful to the knowledge source. We also show that the models with 3B parameters tuned with BeInfo demonstrate strong performance on data from real production' conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:25:44Z)
• Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representations [52.992875653864076]
  We introduce a method for the analysis of text that takes implicitly communicated content explicitly into account.<n>We use a large language model to produce sets of propositions that are inferentially related to the text that has been observed.<n>Our results suggest that modeling the meanings behind observed language, rather than the literal text alone, is a valuable direction for NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T23:45:20Z)
• SWING: Balancing Coverage and Faithfulness for Dialogue Summarization [67.76393867114923]
  We propose to utilize natural language inference (NLI) models to improve coverage while avoiding factual inconsistencies. We use NLI to compute fine-grained training signals to encourage the model to generate content in the reference summaries that have not been covered. Experiments on the DialogSum and SAMSum datasets confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T09:33:11Z)
• Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Filling [66.80201541759409]
  We introduce the concept of policy-aware abuse detection, abandoning the unrealistic expectation that systems can reliably learn which phenomena constitute abuse from inspecting the data alone. We show how architectures for intent classification and slot filling can be used for abuse detection, while providing a rationale for model decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T03:33:30Z)
• Limits of Individual Consent and Models of Distributed Consent in Online Social Networks [1.0276024900942875]
  A user who consents to allow access to their profile can expose the personal data of their network connections to non-consented access. We introduce both a platform-specific model of "distributed consent" and a cross-platform model of a "consent passport" In both models, individuals and groups can coordinate by giving consent conditional on that of their network connections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T16:00:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.