From Clicks to Consensus: Collective Consent Assemblies for Data Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16752v2
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 20:49:30 GMT
• Title: From Clicks to Consensus: Collective Consent Assemblies for Data Governance
• Authors: Lin Kyi, Paul Gölz, Robin Berjon, Asia Biega,
• Abstract summary: Notice and consent, the standard for collecting consent, has been criticized.<n>This paper argues that a collective approach to consent is worth exploring.<n>We propose collective consent, operationalized through consent assemblies, as one alternative framework.
• Score: 8.312192184427762
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Obtaining meaningful and informed consent from users is essential for ensuring autonomy and control over one's data. Notice and consent, the standard for collecting consent, has been criticized. While other individualized solutions have been proposed, this paper argues that a collective approach to consent is worth exploring. First, individual consent is not always feasible to collect for all data collection scenarios. Second, harms resulting from data processing are often communal in nature, given the interconnected nature of some data. Finally, ensuring truly informed consent for every individual has proven impractical. We propose collective consent, operationalized through consent assemblies, as one alternative framework. We establish collective consent's theoretical foundations and use speculative design to envision consent assemblies leveraging deliberative mini-publics. We present two vignettes: i) replacing notice and consent, and ii) collecting consent for GenAI model training. Our paper employs future backcasting to identify the requirements for realizing collective consent and explores its potential applications in contexts where individual consent is infeasible.

Related papers

• Analysis of Terms of Service on Social Media Platforms: Consent Challenges and Assessment Metrics [2.0304958287672448]
  Social media platforms typically obtain user consent through Terms of Service presented at account creation.<n>This study investigates whether consent-related information is clearly communicated within these ToS documents.<n>Using a combination of computational and qualitative analyses, we assess ToS from 13 major social media platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T00:47:28Z)
• Breaking the illusion: Automated Reasoning of GDPR Consent Violations [9.488261532697814]
  We present Cosmic, a novel automated framework for detecting consent-related privacy violations in web forms.<n>Cosmic detects 3384 violations on 94.1% of consent forms, covering key principles such as freely given consent purpose disclosure, and withdrawal options.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T05:22:00Z)
• How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy [52.00934156883483]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is a framework for reasoning about and limiting information leakage.<n>Differentially Private Synthetic data refers to synthetic data that preserves the overall trends of source data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T21:14:39Z)
• Personal Data Processing for Behavioural Targeting: Which Legal Basis? [0.2262632497140704]
  This paper argues that the cookie consent requirement from the ePrivacy Directive does not provide a legal basis for the processing of personal data.<n>Even if companies could use an opt-out system to comply with the e-Privacy Directive's consent requirement for using a tracking cookie, they would generally have to obtain the data subject's unambiguous consent if they process personal data for behavioural targeting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T18:55:53Z)
• Ownership and Flow Primitives for Scalable Consent Management in Digital Public Infrastructures [1.8899300124593648]
  Digital public infrastructures (DPIs) represent networks of open technology standards, applications, services, and digital assets made available for the public good.<n>One of the key challenges in DPI design is to resolve complex issues of consent, scaled over large populations.<n>This paper addresses the question of representing modes of ownership of digital assets and their corresponding implications for consensual data flows in a DPI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T19:52:55Z)
• Can AI be Consentful? [0.5278958184444331]
  generative AI systems expose the challenges of traditional legal and ethical frameworks built around consent.<n>This chapter examines how the conventional notion of consent, while fundamental to data protection and privacy rights, proves insufficient in addressing the implications of AI-generated content derived from personal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T15:32:16Z)
• Mutual Benefit: The Case for Sharing Autonomous Vehicle Data with the Public [45.26729657448177]
  We argue for the normative idea that a part of this data should more explicitly benefit the general public by sharing it through a trusted entity as a form of compensation and control for the communities that are being experimented upon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T15:54:59Z)
• Can Workers Meaningfully Consent to Workplace Wellbeing Technologies? [65.15780777033109]
  This paper unpacks the challenges workers face when consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies. We show how workers are vulnerable to "meaningless" consent as they may be subject to power dynamics that minimize their ability to withhold consent. To meaningfully consent, participants wanted changes to the technology and to the policies and practices surrounding the technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:15:07Z)
• WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipedia [63.234352061821625]
  We propose WiCE, a new fine-grained textual entailment dataset built on natural claim and evidence pairs extracted from Wikipedia. In addition to standard claim-level entailment, WiCE provides entailment judgments over sub-sentence units of the claim. We show that real claims in our dataset involve challenging verification and retrieval problems that existing models fail to address.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:45:32Z)
• Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Filling [66.80201541759409]
  We introduce the concept of policy-aware abuse detection, abandoning the unrealistic expectation that systems can reliably learn which phenomena constitute abuse from inspecting the data alone. We show how architectures for intent classification and slot filling can be used for abuse detection, while providing a rationale for model decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T03:33:30Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)
• Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge [58.720142291102135]
  In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z)
• Limits of Individual Consent and Models of Distributed Consent in Online Social Networks [1.0276024900942875]
  A user who consents to allow access to their profile can expose the personal data of their network connections to non-consented access. We introduce both a platform-specific model of "distributed consent" and a cross-platform model of a "consent passport" In both models, individuals and groups can coordinate by giving consent conditional on that of their network connections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T16:00:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.