MedCoRAG: Interpretable Hepatology Diagnosis via Hybrid Evidence Retrieval and Multispecialty Consensus
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05129v1
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 12:58:45 GMT
- Title: MedCoRAG: Interpretable Hepatology Diagnosis via Hybrid Evidence Retrieval and Multispecialty Consensus
- Abstract summary: Existing AI approaches for clinical diagnosis often lack transparency, structured reasoning, and deployability.<n>We propose MedCoRAG, an end-to-end framework that generates diagnostic hypotheses from standardized abnormal findings.<n>It then constructs a patient-specific evidence package by jointly retrieving and pruning UMLS knowledge graph paths and clinical guidelines.
- Score: 24.19892707167392
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Diagnosing hepatic diseases accurately and interpretably is critical, yet it remains challenging in real-world clinical settings. Existing AI approaches for clinical diagnosis often lack transparency, structured reasoning, and deployability. Recent efforts have leveraged large language models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multi-agent collaboration. However, these approaches typically retrieve evidence from a single source and fail to support iterative, role-specialized deliberation grounded in structured clinical data. To address this, we propose MedCoRAG (i.e., Medical Collaborative RAG), an end-to-end framework that generates diagnostic hypotheses from standardized abnormal findings and constructs a patient-specific evidence package by jointly retrieving and pruning UMLS knowledge graph paths and clinical guidelines. It then performs Multi-Agent Collaborative Reasoning: a Router Agent dynamically dispatches Specialist Agents based on case complexity; these agents iteratively reason over the evidence and trigger targeted re-retrievals when needed, while a Generalist Agent synthesizes all deliberations into a traceable consensus diagnosis that emulates multidisciplinary consultation. Experimental results on hepatic disease cases from MIMIC-IV show that MedCoRAG outperforms existing methods and closed-source models in both diagnostic performance and reasoning interpretability.
Related papers
- EMR: Self-Evolving Medical Multi-Agent System via Experience Mining and Reuse [16.25658951326869]
Large language model (LLM) driven multi-agent systems have shown promise in complex clinical reasoning.<n>We present EMR, a self-evolving medical multi-agent system via Experience Mining and Reuse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T07:41:56Z) - MedReaMM: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Expert-Level Clinical Diagnostic Synthesis [61.266743965495884]
We introduce MedReaMM, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to synthesize heterogeneous clinical evidence.<n>MedReaMM comprises 625 expert-validated cases with an average of 2.79 medical images per case and a total of 1,042 standardized diagnoses annotated with ICD-11 codes.<n>We evaluate 23 Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and find that most achieve diagnostic accuracy scores below 50%, underscoring a substantial gap in multimodal diagnostic synthesis capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T09:37:53Z) - Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs [63.535652574541764]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image analysis.<n>Their application in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently hindered by two critical limitations.<n>We propose a novel Clinical-Cognitive-Aligned (CogAlign) framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-21T07:47:37Z) - MedCollab: Causal-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration for Full-Cycle Clinical Diagnosis via IBIS-Structured Argumentation [6.334763475104128]
We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals.<n>The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T14:25:58Z) - RE-MCDF: Closed-Loop Multi-Expert LLM Reasoning for Knowledge-Grounded Clinical Diagnosis [11.973474883672282]
We propose RE-MCDF, a relation-enhanced multi-expert clinical diagnosis framework.<n>We show that RE-MCDF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in complex diagnostic scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T15:53:27Z) - AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z) - MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z) - CXRAgent: Director-Orchestrated Multi-Stage Reasoning for Chest X-Ray Interpretation [62.0150409256153]
We propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation.<n>The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator.<n>Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T10:31:30Z) - RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z) - End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z) - Tree-of-Reasoning: Towards Complex Medical Diagnosis via Multi-Agent Reasoning with Evidence Tree [14.013981070330153]
We propose Tree-of-Reasoning (ToR), a novel multi-agent framework designed to handle complex scenarios.<n>Specifically, ToR introduces a tree structure that can clearly record the reasoning path of large language models (LLMs) and the corresponding clinical evidence.<n>At the same time, we propose a cross-validation mechanism to ensure the consistency of multi-agent decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T03:31:28Z) - RadFabric: Agentic AI System with Reasoning Capability for Radiology [61.25593938175618]
RadFabric is a multi agent, multimodal reasoning framework that unifies visual and textual analysis for comprehensive CXR interpretation.<n>System employs specialized CXR agents for pathology detection, an Anatomical Interpretation Agent to map visual findings to precise anatomical structures, and a Reasoning Agent powered by large multimodal reasoning models to synthesize visual, anatomical, and clinical data into transparent and evidence based diagnoses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T03:10:33Z) - MedAgent-Pro: Towards Evidence-based Multi-modal Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflow [14.478357882578234]
In modern medicine, clinical diagnosis relies on the comprehensive analysis of primarily textual and visual data.<n>Recent advances in large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and agent-based methods hold great potential for medical diagnosis.<n>We propose MedAgent-Pro, a new agentic reasoning paradigm that follows the diagnosis principle in modern medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T14:04:18Z) - Beyond Direct Diagnosis: LLM-based Multi-Specialist Agent Consultation
for Automatic Diagnosis [30.943705201552643]
We propose a framework to model the diagnosis process in the real world by adaptively fusing probability distributions of agents over potential diseases.
Our approach requires significantly less parameter updating and training time, enhancing efficiency and practical utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T12:25:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.