Restoring Linguistic Grounding in VLA Models via Train-Free Attention Recalibration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06001v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:01:36 GMT
• Title: Restoring Linguistic Grounding in VLA Models via Train-Free Attention Recalibration
• Abstract summary: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to perform manipulation tasks directly from natural language instructions.<n>We reveal a critical failure mode in which VLA policies continue executing visually plausible actions even when the language instruction contradicts the scene.<n>We propose Instruction-Guided Attention Recalibration (IGAR), a train-free inference-time mechanism that rebalances attention to restore the influence of language instructions.
• Score: 24.562540060971273
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to perform manipulation tasks directly from natural language instructions and are increasingly viewed as a foundation for generalist robotic policies. However, their reliability under Out-of-Distribution (OOD) instructions remains underexplored. In this paper, we reveal a critical failure mode in which VLA policies continue executing visually plausible actions even when the language instruction contradicts the scene. We refer to this phenomenon as linguistic blindness, where VLA policies prioritize visual priors over instruction semantics during action generation. To systematically analyze this issue, we introduce ICBench, a diagnostic benchmark constructed from the LIBERO dataset that probes language-action coupling by injecting controlled OOD instruction contradictions while keeping the visual environment unchanged. Evaluations on three representative VLA architectures, including Pi0, Pi0.5 and OpenVLA OFT, show that these models frequently succeed at tasks despite logically impossible instructions, revealing a strong visual bias in action generation. To mitigate this issue, we propose Instruction-Guided Attention Recalibration (IGAR), a train-free inference-time mechanism that rebalances attention distributions to restore the influence of language instructions. IGAR operates without retraining or architectural modification and can be directly applied to existing VLA models. Experiments across 30 LIBERO tasks demonstrate that IGAR substantially reduces erroneous execution under OOD contradictory instructions while preserving baseline task performance. We additionally validate the approach on a real Franka robotic arm, where IGAR effectively prevents manipulation triggered by inconsistent instructions.

Related papers

• In-Context VLA: Endowing Vision-Language-Action Models with Language via In-Context Post-Training and Agentic Tool Use [18.507118969955666]
  Vision-Language-Action models imitate expert action chunks conditioned on a static image and a fixed instruction.<n>We introduce textbfourmethod, a framework that endows a VLA with language competence through in-context post-training.<n>Our method consistently achieves SOTA results in both performance and efficiency when compared with CoT-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T08:21:02Z)
• TrustVLA: Mechanism-Guided Inference-Time Defense Against Vision-Language-Action Backdoors [54.12833308568015]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are deployed through pipelines that end users cannot audit.<n>A small visual trigger redirects a long-horizon robot policy before any failure becomes observable.<n>We study this gap through two independently proposed VLA attacks from groups with distinct injection strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T09:43:52Z)
• Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering [19.25748772628753]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control.<n>We propose a framework that interactively searches for language sequences that improve closed-loop VLA task performance.<n>We learn an improvement head that predicts when language steering will improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T16:34:49Z)
• QuoVLA: Quotient Space for Vision-Language-Action Models [51.02329790939691]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models commonly adapt pretrained VLM latents to robot control by mapping visual observations and language instructions to continuous actions.<n>Our textitQuotient Theory for VLA shows that pretrained VLM latents are not action-insufficient but action-sufficient.<n>We propose QuoVLA, a quotient-space framework for VLA that compresses pretrained VLM latents into action-sufficient representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T06:28:53Z)
• TAG: Target-Agnostic Guidance for Stable Object-Centric Inference in Vision-Language-Action Models [59.13964209628383]
  Vision-Language--Action (VLA) policies have shown strong progress in mapping language instructions and visual observations to robotic actions, yet their reliability degrades in cluttered scenes with distractors.<n>We propose TAG (Target-Agnostic Guidance), a simple inference-time guidance mechanism that explicitly reduces distractor- and appearance-induced bias in VLA policies.<n>We evaluate TAG on standard manipulation benchmarks, including LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and VLABench, where it consistently improves robustness under clutter and reduces near-miss and wrong-object executions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T17:56:32Z)
• When Vision Overrides Language: Evaluating and Mitigating Counterfactual Failures in VLAs [31.92520697946991]
  Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) promise to ground language instructions in robot control, yet in practice often fail to faithfully follow language.<n>We show that counterfactual failures are prevalent yet underexplored across state-of-the-art VLAs.<n>We propose Counterfactual Action Guidance (CAG), a simple yet effective dual-branch inference scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:59:20Z)
• ReViP: Reducing False Completion in Vision-Language-Action Models with Vision-Proprioception Rebalance [50.05984919728878]
  We present ReViP, a novel VLA framework with Vision-Proprioception Rebalance to enhance visual grounding and robustness under perturbations.<n>Specifically, we use an external VLM as a task-stage observer to extract real-time task-centric visual cues from visual observations.<n>To evaluate false completion, we propose the first False-Completion Benchmark Suite built on LIBERO with controlled settings such as Object-Drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:31:07Z)
• LangForce: Bayesian Decomposition of Vision Language Action Models via Latent Action Queries [30.732526921367835]
  LangForce is a novel framework that enforces instruction following via Bayesian decomposition.<n>We show that LangForce significantly improves generalization without requiring new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T17:15:22Z)
• Seeing to Act, Prompting to Specify: A Bayesian Factorization of Vision Language Action Policy [59.44168425139687]
  BayesVLA is a Bayesian factorization that decomposes the policy into a visual-action prior, supporting seeing-to-act, and a language-conditioned likelihood, enabling prompt-to-specify.<n>Experiments show superior generalization to unseen instructions, objects, and environments compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T01:59:23Z)
• AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [60.39655329875822]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to interpret natural-language instructions and perform diverse tasks.<n>Despite growing interest in attacking such models, the effectiveness of existing techniques remains unclear.<n>We propose AttackVLA, a unified framework that aligns with the VLA development lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T10:30:46Z)
• Learning Affordances at Inference-Time for Vision-Language-Action Models [50.93181349331096]
  In robotics, Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) offer a promising path towards solving complex control tasks.<n>We introduce Learning from Inference-Time Execution (LITEN), which connects a VLA low-level policy to a high-level VLM that conditions on past experiences.<n>Our approach iterates between a reasoning phase that generates and executes plans for the low-level VLA, and an assessment phase that reflects on the resulting execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T16:43:29Z)
• Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible [53.40183895299108]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance on a range of robotic tasks.<n>We propose Instruct-Verify-and-Act (IVA), a framework that detects when an instruction cannot be executed due to a false premise.<n>Our experiments show that IVA improves false premise detection accuracy by 97.56% over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T10:54:33Z)
• MarvelOVD: Marrying Object Recognition and Vision-Language Models for Robust Open-Vocabulary Object Detection [107.15164718585666]
  We investigate the root cause of VLMs' biased prediction under the open vocabulary detection context. Our observations lead to a simple yet effective paradigm, coded MarvelOVD, that generates significantly better training targets. Our method outperforms the other state-of-the-arts by significant margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T09:23:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.