Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12299v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:34:49 GMT
• Title: Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering
• Abstract summary: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control.<n>We propose a framework that interactively searches for language sequences that improve closed-loop VLA task performance.<n>We learn an improvement head that predicts when language steering will improve performance.
• Score: 19.25748772628753
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control, but the mapping from language to behavior is often brittle and unintuitive: semantically similar instructions can induce drastically different behaviors, while some capabilities may not be elicitable through prompting alone. As a result, both human instructions and zero-shot language models can fail to reliably steer VLAs toward successful task execution. In this work, we propose a framework that interactively searches for language sequences that improve closed-loop VLA task performance, distills these sequences into a test-time language feedback policy (LFP), and learns an improvement head that predicts when language steering will improve performance. We conformalize this improvement head to prevent harmful steering interventions, where the LFP decreases task performance relative to the original instruction on out-of-distribution scenarios. Crucially, our approach operates on arbitrary frozen pre-trained VLAs, requiring neither access to the original training distribution nor fine-tuning of the underlying model. On seen environments, our conformalized LFP improves base VLA performance by 24.7% in simulation and 65.0% in hardware. On visual and semantic perturbations, our conformalized LFP has strong harmlessness guarantees, and produces recovery behaviors not observed with open-loop prompting.

Related papers

• QuoVLA: Quotient Space for Vision-Language-Action Models [51.02329790939691]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models commonly adapt pretrained VLM latents to robot control by mapping visual observations and language instructions to continuous actions.<n>Our textitQuotient Theory for VLA shows that pretrained VLM latents are not action-insufficient but action-sufficient.<n>We propose QuoVLA, a quotient-space framework for VLA that compresses pretrained VLM latents into action-sufficient representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T06:28:53Z)
• RoboAlign: Learning Test-Time Reasoning for Language-Action Alignment in Vision-Language-Action Models [58.83401587988675]
  RoboAlign trains vision-language-action models (VLAs) to translate multimodal understanding into low-level actions.<n>Our key idea is to sample action tokens via zero-shot natural language reasoning and refine this reasoning using reinforcement learning (RL) to improve action accuracy.<n>RoboAlign achieves performance improvements of 17.5%, 18.9%, and 106.6% over SFT baselines on LIBERO, CALVIN, and real-world environments, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T17:57:55Z)
• Restoring Linguistic Grounding in VLA Models via Train-Free Attention Recalibration [24.562540060971273]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to perform manipulation tasks directly from natural language instructions.<n>We reveal a critical failure mode in which VLA policies continue executing visually plausible actions even when the language instruction contradicts the scene.<n>We propose Instruction-Guided Attention Recalibration (IGAR), a train-free inference-time mechanism that rebalances attention to restore the influence of language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T08:01:36Z)
• When Vision Overrides Language: Evaluating and Mitigating Counterfactual Failures in VLAs [31.92520697946991]
  Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) promise to ground language instructions in robot control, yet in practice often fail to faithfully follow language.<n>We show that counterfactual failures are prevalent yet underexplored across state-of-the-art VLAs.<n>We propose Counterfactual Action Guidance (CAG), a simple yet effective dual-branch inference scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:59:20Z)
• VLS: Steering Pretrained Robot Policies via Vision-Language Models [31.189909515514668]
  Vision-Language Steering (VLS) is a training-free framework for inference-time adaptation of frozen generative robot policies.<n>VLS treats adaptation as an inference-time control problem, steering the sampling process of a pretrained diffusion or flow-matching policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T19:50:16Z)
• ReViP: Reducing False Completion in Vision-Language-Action Models with Vision-Proprioception Rebalance [50.05984919728878]
  We present ReViP, a novel VLA framework with Vision-Proprioception Rebalance to enhance visual grounding and robustness under perturbations.<n>Specifically, we use an external VLM as a task-stage observer to extract real-time task-centric visual cues from visual observations.<n>To evaluate false completion, we propose the first False-Completion Benchmark Suite built on LIBERO with controlled settings such as Object-Drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:31:07Z)
• On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning [61.38273866396522]
  Vision-Language-Action models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for general-purpose robot learning.<n>Current methods remain unsuitable for challenging simulated- or physical-world deployments.<n>We introduce a Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for VLAs framework that enables on-the-fly policy adaptation during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T01:51:30Z)
• Learning Affordances at Inference-Time for Vision-Language-Action Models [50.93181349331096]
  In robotics, Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) offer a promising path towards solving complex control tasks.<n>We introduce Learning from Inference-Time Execution (LITEN), which connects a VLA low-level policy to a high-level VLM that conditions on past experiences.<n>Our approach iterates between a reasoning phase that generates and executes plans for the low-level VLA, and an assessment phase that reflects on the resulting execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T16:43:29Z)
• Do What You Say: Steering Vision-Language-Action Models via Runtime Reasoning-Action Alignment Verification [17.948161564138033]
  Reasoning Vision Language Action (VLA) models improve robotic instruction-following by generating step-by-step textual plans before low-level actions.<n>But even with a correct textual plan, the generated actions can still miss the intended outcomes in the plan, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.<n>We formalize this phenomenon as a lack of embodied CoT faithfulness, and introduce a training-free, runtime policy steering method for reasoning-action alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T00:38:45Z)
• Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible [53.40183895299108]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong performance on a range of robotic tasks.<n>We propose Instruct-Verify-and-Act (IVA), a framework that detects when an instruction cannot be executed due to a false premise.<n>Our experiments show that IVA improves false premise detection accuracy by 97.56% over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T10:54:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.