Agentic retrieval-augmented reasoning reshapes collective reliability under model variability in radiology question answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06271v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 13:31:54 GMT
• Title: Agentic retrieval-augmented reasoning reshapes collective reliability under model variability in radiology question answering
• Abstract summary: Agentic retrieval-augmented reasoning pipelines are increasingly used to structure how large language models incorporate external evidence in clinical decision support.<n>These systems iteratively retrieve curated domain knowledge and synthesize it into structured reports before answer selection.<n>Although such pipelines can improve performance, their impact on reliability under model variability remains unclear.
• Score: 1.295312759062166
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic retrieval-augmented reasoning pipelines are increasingly used to structure how large language models (LLMs) incorporate external evidence in clinical decision support. These systems iteratively retrieve curated domain knowledge and synthesize it into structured reports before answer selection. Although such pipelines can improve performance, their impact on reliability under model variability remains unclear. In real-world deployment, heterogeneous models may align, diverge, or synchronize errors in ways not captured by accuracy. We evaluated 34 LLMs on 169 expert-curated publicly available radiology questions, comparing zero-shot inference with a radiology-specific multi-step agentic retrieval condition in which all models received identical structured evidence reports derived from curated radiology knowledge. Agentic inference reduced inter-model decision dispersion (median entropy 0.48 vs. 0.13) and increased robustness of correctness across models (mean 0.74 vs. 0.81). Majority consensus also increased overall (P<0.001). Consensus strength and robust correctness remained correlated under both strategies (\r{ho}=0.88 for zero-shot; \r{ho}=0.87 for agentic), although high agreement did not guarantee correctness. Response verbosity showed no meaningful association with correctness. Among 572 incorrect outputs, 72% were associated with moderate or high clinically assessed severity, although inter-rater agreement was low (\k{appa}=0.02). Agentic retrieval therefore was associated with more concentrated decision distributions, stronger consensus, and higher cross-model robustness of correctness. These findings suggest that evaluating agentic systems through accuracy or agreement alone may not always be sufficient, and that complementary analyses of stability, cross-model robustness, and potential clinical impact are needed to characterize reliability under model variability.

Related papers

• Cross-Fitted Residual Utility for Primary-Preserving Cognitive Decision Correction in Automatic Modulation Classification [1.547549252134621]
  We study a post-inference problem through cross-fitted residual utility and a primary-preserving cognitive decision policy.<n>A structured KAN-Fourier classifier supplies the default probability, while neural and non-neural candidates provide observable evidence.<n>On RMLA, RMLB, and HISAR, the complete system improves overall accuracy from 63.632% to 66.332%, 65.161% to 66.168%, and 77.769% to 79.867%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T11:07:37Z)
• Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict [7.0911450027790774]
  Context-Driven Decomposition (CDD) is a belief-decomposition probe that operates at inference time.<n>It serves as an intervention mechanism for controlled retrieval conflict.<n>These three patterns identify context-compliance as a structural axis along which standard RAG can be probed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T07:14:19Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• TRIAGE: Type-Routed Interventions via Aleatoric-Epistemic Gated Estimation in Robotic Manipulation and Adaptive Perception -- Don't Treat All Uncertainty the Same [2.755751829139168]
  Most uncertainty-aware robotic systems collapse prediction uncertainty into a single scalar score and use it to trigger uniform corrective responses.<n>This aggregation obscures whether uncertainty arises from corrupted observations or from mismatch between the learned model and the true system dynamics.<n>We introduce a lightweight post hoc framework that decomposes uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic components and uses these signals to regulate system responses at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T09:07:43Z)
• The Drill-Down and Fabricate Test (DDFT): A Protocol for Measuring Epistemic Robustness in Language Models [0.0]
  Current language model evaluations measure what models know under ideal conditions but not how robustly they know it under realistic stress.<n>We introduce the Drill-Down Fabricate Test (DDFT), a protocol that measures robustness.<n>We find flagship models exhibit brittleness despite their scale, while smaller models can achieve robust performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T20:29:09Z)
• CONFIDE: Hallucination Assessment for Reliable Biomolecular Structure Prediction and Design [46.12506067241116]
  We present CODE (Chain of Diffusion Embeddings), a self evaluating metric to quantify topological frustration.<n>We propose CONFIDE, a unified evaluation framework that combines energetic and topological perspectives.<n>By combining data driven embeddings with theoretical insight, CODE and CONFIDE outperform existing metrics across a wide range of biomolecular systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T03:38:46Z)
• An Explainable and Fair AI Tool for PCOS Risk Assessment: Calibration, Subgroup Equity, and Interactive Clinical Deployment [0.10026496861838446]
  This paper presents a fairness-audited and interpretable machine learning framework for predicting polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)<n>The framework integrated SHAP-based feature attributions with demographic audits to connect predictive explanations with observed disparities for actionable insights.<n>A Streamlit-based web interface enables real-time PCOS risk assessment, Rotterdam criteria evaluation, and interactive 'what-if' analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T16:14:56Z)
• Uncovering Overconfident Failures in CXR Models via Augmentation-Sensitivity Risk Scoring [1.9837702647603577]
  We propose an augmentation-sensitivity risk scoring (ASRS) framework to identify error-prone chest radiograph (CXR) cases.<n>ASRS scores stratify samples into stability quartiles, where highly sensitive cases show substantially lower recall.<n>ASRS provides a label-free means for selective prediction and clinician review, improving fairness and safety in medical AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T05:15:40Z)
• Towards Agents That Know When They Don't Know: Uncertainty as a Control Signal for Structured Reasoning [19.099363114326355]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in structured biomedical data environments.<n>We introduce an uncertainty-aware agent for query-conditioned multi-table summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T15:12:10Z)
• TrustLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Failure Detection under Out-of-distribution Data [62.22804234013273]
  We propose a simple failure detection framework to unify and facilitate classification with rejection under both covariate and semantic shifts.<n>Our key insight is that by separating and consolidating failure-specific reliability knowledge with low-rank adapters, we can enhance the failure detection ability effectively and flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T09:20:55Z)
• Agent-Based Uncertainty Awareness Improves Automated Radiology Report Labeling with an Open-Source Large Language Model [1.7064514726335305]
  We analyzed 9,683 Hebrew radiology reports from Crohn's disease patients.<n>We incorporated uncertainty-aware prompt ensembles and an agent-based decision model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T16:57:03Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
  Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.