Building the ethical AI framework of the future: from philosophy to practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06599v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 03:45:23 GMT
• Title: Building the ethical AI framework of the future: from philosophy to practice
• Abstract summary: Existing governance instruments provide high-level guidance but often lack enforceable, end-to-end operational controls.<n>This paper presents an ethics-by-design control architecture that embeds consequentialist, deontological, and virtue-ethical reasoning into stage-specific enforcement mechanisms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence pipelines -- spanning data collection, model training, deployment, and post-deployment monitoring -- concentrate ethical risks that intensify with multimodal and agentic systems. Existing governance instruments, including the EU AI Act, the IEEE 7000 series, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, provide high-level guidance but often lack enforceable, end-to-end operational controls. This paper presents an ethics-by-design control architecture that embeds consequentialist, deontological, and virtue-ethical reasoning into stage-specific enforcement mechanisms across the AI lifecycle. The framework implements a triple-gate structure at each lifecycle stage: Metric gates (quantitative performance and safety thresholds), Governance gates (legal, rights, and procedural compliance), and Eco gates (carbon and water budgets and sustainability constraints). It specifies measurable trigger conditions, escalation paths, audit artefacts, and mappings to EU AI Act obligations and NIST RMF functions, enabling integration with existing MLOps and CI/CD pipelines. Illustrative examples from large language model pipelines demonstrate how gate-based controls can surface and constrain technical, social, and environmental risks prior to release and during runtime. The framework is accompanied by a preregistered evaluation protocol that defines ex ante success criteria and assessment procedures, enabling falsifiable evaluation of gate effectiveness. By translating normative commitments into enforceable and testable controls, the framework provides a practical basis for operational AI governance across organizational contexts, jurisdictions, and deployment scales.

Related papers

• Neuro-Symbolic Agents for Regulated Process Automation: Challenges and Research Agenda [43.328395470827665]
  We argue that symbolic structures embedded in regulated industries should be treated as core architectural components.<n>We propose compliance-by-construction as a complementary paradigm to guardrail-based monitoring.<n>We call on the neuro-symbolic community to engage with regulated process automation as a high impact research domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T14:34:11Z)
• From Frontier to Shadow AI: A Simmering Threat to Assurance and Security in Critical Infrastructure [8.167474882691755]
  We present the first empirical study of shadow AI in critical infrastructure environments.<n>We analyse how shadow AI manifests in practice, how it interacts with existing technical and governance controls, and the resulting security, assurance, and compliance risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T07:21:08Z)
• From Review to Design: Ethical Multimodal Driver Monitoring Systems for Risk Mitigation, Incident Response, and Accountability in Automated Vehicles [4.497527935481453]
  We propose a modular ethical design framework tailored specifically to Driver Monitoring Systems.<n>The framework translates high-level principles into actionable design and deployment guidance.<n>Together, these contributions aim to inform the development of transparent, trustworthy, and human-centered driver monitoring systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T15:40:17Z)
• COMPASS: The explainable agentic framework for Sovereignty, Sustainability, Compliance, and Ethics [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel multi-agent orchestration system designed to enforce value-aligned AI.<n>The framework comprises an Orchestrator and four specialised sub-agents addressing sovereignty, carbon-aware computing, compliance, and ethics.<n>By employing an LLM-as-a-judge methodology, the system assigns quantitative scores and generates explainable justifications for each assessment dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T20:14:35Z)
• SAGE-LLM: Towards Safe and Generalizable LLM Controller with Fuzzy-CBF Verification and Graph-Structured Knowledge Retrieval for UAV Decision [46.089736018739295]
  Large Language Models (LLM) lack domain-specific UAV control knowledge and formal safety assurances.<n>This paper proposes a train-free two-layer decision architecture based on LLMs, integrating high-level safety planning with low-level precise control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T06:41:04Z)
• Standards for trustworthy AI in the European Union: technical rationale, structural challenges, and an implementation path [0.0]
  This white paper examines the technical foundations of European AI standardization under the AI Act.<n>It explains how harmonized standards enable the presumption of conformity mechanism, describes the CEN/CENELEC standardization process, and analyzes why AI poses unique challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T11:58:47Z)
• Behavior Trees vs Executable Ontologies: a Comparative Analysis of Robot Control Paradigms [51.56484100374058]
  We compare two approaches to modeling robotic behavior: imperative Behavior Trees (BTs) and declarative Executable Ontologies (EO)<n>BTs structure behavior hierarchically using control-flow, whereas EO represents the domain as a temporal, event-based semantic graph driven by dataflow rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T09:38:01Z)
• Towards a Framework for Supporting the Ethical and Regulatory Certification of AI Systems [8.633165810707315]
  CERTAIN project aims to integrate regulatory compliance, ethical standards, and transparency into AI systems.<n>We outline the methodological steps for building the core components of this framework.<n>CERTAIN aims to advance regulatory compliance and to promote responsible AI innovation aligned with European standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T08:54:02Z)
• A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification [0.6875312133832078]
  The governance of artificial iintelligence (AI) systems requires a structured approach that connects high-level regulatory principles with practical implementation.<n>Existing frameworks lack clarity on how regulations translate into conformity mechanisms, leading to gaps in compliance and enforcement.<n>A five-layer AI governance framework is proposed, spanning from broad regulatory mandates to specific standards, assessment methodologies, and certification processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T16:19:08Z)
• Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned [45.44933002008943]
  This white paper presents the T"UV AUSTRIA Trusted AI framework.<n>It is an end-to-end audit catalog and methodology for assessing and certifying machine learning systems.<n>Building on three pillars - Secure Software Development, Functional Requirements, and Ethics & Data Privacy - it translates the high-level obligations of the EU AI Act into specific, testable criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:52:08Z)
• Toward a Global Regime for Compute Governance: Building the Pause Button [0.4952055253916912]
  We propose a governance system designed to prevent AI systems from being trained by restricting access to computational resources.<n>We identify three key intervention points -- technical, traceability, and regulatory -- and organize them within a Governance--Enforcement--Verification framework.<n> Technical mechanisms include tamper-proof FLOP caps, model locking, and offline licensing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T15:18:19Z)
• Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance [46.71493672772134]
  We argue that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight.<n>We propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T18:10:04Z)
• Designing Control Barrier Function via Probabilistic Enumeration for Safe Reinforcement Learning Navigation [55.02966123945644]
  We propose a hierarchical control framework leveraging neural network verification techniques to design control barrier functions (CBFs) and policy correction mechanisms.<n>Our approach relies on probabilistic enumeration to identify unsafe regions of operation, which are then used to construct a safe CBF-based control layer.<n>These experiments demonstrate the ability of the proposed solution to correct unsafe actions while preserving efficient navigation behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T13:47:25Z)
• Semantic Integrity Constraints: Declarative Guardrails for AI-Augmented Data Processing Systems [39.23499993745249]
  We introduce semantic integrity constraints (SICs) for specifying and enforcing correctness conditions over LLM outputs in semantic queries.<n>SICs generalize traditional database integrity constraints to semantic settings, supporting common types of constraints, such as grounding, soundness, and exclusion.<n>We present a system design for integrating SICs into query planning and runtime and discuss its realization in AI-augmented DPSs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T19:59:25Z)
• COMPL-AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Act [40.233017376716305]
  The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) is a significant step towards responsible AI development.<n>It lacks clear technical interpretation, making it difficult to assess models' compliance.<n>This work presents COMPL-AI, a comprehensive framework consisting of the first technical interpretation of the Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T14:23:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.