Trust Aware Federated Learning for Secure Bone Healing Stage Interpretation in e-Health

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06646v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 11:28:58 GMT
• Title: Trust Aware Federated Learning for Secure Bone Healing Stage Interpretation in e-Health
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a trust aware federated learning framework for interpreting bone healing stages.<n>The framework employs a multi-layer perceptron model trained across simulated clients using the Flower FL framework.
• Score: 3.523596898195567
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a trust aware federated learning (FL) framework for interpreting bone healing stages using spectral features derived from frequency response data. The primary objective is to address the challenge posed by either unreliable or adversarial participants in distributed medical sensing environments. The framework employs a multi-layer perceptron model trained across simulated clients using the Flower FL framework. The proposed approach integrates an Adaptive Trust Score Scaling and Filtering (ATSSSF) mechanism with exponential moving average (EMA) smoothing to assess, validate and filter client contributions.Two trust score smoothing strategies have been investigated, one with a fixed factor and another that adapts according to trust score variability. Clients with low trust are excluded from aggregation and readmitted once their reliability improves, ensuring model integrity while maintaining inclusivity. Standard classification metrics have been used to compare the performance of ATSSSF with the baseline Federated Averaging strategy. Experimental results demonstrate that adaptive trust management can improve both training stability and predictive performance by mitigating the negative effects of compromised clients while retaining robust detection capabilities. The work establishes the feasibility for adaptive trust mechanisms in federated medical sensing and identifies extension to clinical cross silo aggregation as a future research direction.

Related papers

• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• TrustFed: Enabling Trustworthy Medical AI under Data Privacy Constraints [2.9567293946666173]
  Federated learning can enable privacy-preserving, multi-institutional training without sharing raw patient data.<n>TrustFed provides distribution-free, finite-sample coverage guarantees under heterogeneous and imbalanced healthcare data.<n>We conduct one of the most comprehensive evaluations of uncertainty-aware federated learning in medical imaging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T07:34:45Z)
• Epistemic Context Learning: Building Trust the Right Way in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [94.9141394384021]
  Individual agents in multi-agent systems often lack robustness, tending to blindly conform to misleading peers.<n>We show this weakness stems from both sycophancy and inadequate ability to evaluate peer reliability.<n>We first formalize the learning problem of history-aware reference, introducing the historical interactions of peers as additional input.<n>We then develop Epistemic Context Learning (ECL), a reasoning framework that conditions predictions on explicitly-built peer profiles from history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T13:59:32Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• FLARE: Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Reputation for Robust Client Reliability in Federated Learning [0.6524460254566904]
  Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy.<n>It remains vulnerable to malicious clients who compromise model integrity through Byzantine attacks, data poisoning, or adaptive adversarial behaviors.<n>We propose FLARE, an adaptive reputation-based framework that transforms client reliability assessment from binary decisions to a continuous, multi-dimensional trust evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T17:57:40Z)
• GuardFed: A Trustworthy Federated Learning Framework Against Dual-Facet Attacks [56.983319121358555]
  Federated learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative model training but remains vulnerable to adversarial behaviors.<n>We introduce the Dual-Facet Attack (DFA), a novel threat model that concurrently undermines predictive accuracy and group fairness.<n>We propose GuardFed, a self-adaptive defense framework that maintains a fairness-aware reference model using a small amount of clean server data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T13:02:45Z)
• FedFiTS: Fitness-Selected, Slotted Client Scheduling for Trustworthy Federated Learning in Healthcare AI [33.17279604575767]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for privacy-preserving model training, yet deployments in sensitive domains such as healthcare face persistent challenges.<n>This paper introduces FedFiTS, a trust-aware selective FLTS that advances FedFaSt line by combining fitness-based client election with adaptive aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:06:04Z)
• Aurora: Are Android Malware Classifiers Reliable and Stable under Distribution Shift? [51.12297424766236]
  AURORA is a framework to evaluate malware classifiers based on their confidence quality and operational resilience.<n>AURORA is complemented by a set of metrics designed to go beyond point-in-time performance.<n>The fragility in SOTA frameworks across datasets of varying drift suggests the need for a return to the whiteboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T20:22:43Z)
• Enhancing Federated Survival Analysis through Peer-Driven Client Reputation in Healthcare [1.2289361708127877]
  Federated Learning holds great promise for digital health by enabling collaborative model training without compromising patient data privacy.<n>We propose a peer-driven reputation mechanism for federated healthcare that integrates decentralized peer feedback with clustering-based noise handling.<n>Applying differential privacy to client-side model updates ensures sensitive information remains protected during reputation computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T03:49:51Z)
• Revisit the Stability of Vanilla Federated Learning Under Diverse Conditions [3.237380113935023]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm enabling collaborative model training across decentralized clients.<n>We revisit the stability of the vanilla FedAvg algorithm under diverse conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T07:47:59Z)
• Reliable Federated Disentangling Network for Non-IID Domain Feature [62.73267904147804]
  In this paper, we propose a novel reliable federated disentangling network, termed RFedDis. To the best of our knowledge, our proposed RFedDis is the first work to develop an FL approach based on evidential uncertainty combined with feature disentangling. Our proposed RFedDis provides outstanding performance with a high degree of reliability as compared to other state-of-the-art FL approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T11:46:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.