PaLMR: Towards Faithful Visual Reasoning via Multimodal Process Alignment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06652v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 04:33:11 GMT
- Title: PaLMR: Towards Faithful Visual Reasoning via Multimodal Process Alignment
- Abstract summary: PaLMR is a framework that aligns not only outcomes but also the reasoning process itself.<n> Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL-7B show that our approach substantially reduces reasoning hallucinations and improves visual reasoning fidelity.<n>These findings indicate that PaLMR offers a principled and practical route to process-aligned multimodal reasoning.
- Score: 29.229662966154507
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning has recently improved the reasoning ability of Large Language Models and Multimodal LLMs, yet prevailing reward designs emphasise final-answer correctness and consequently tolerate process hallucinations--cases where models reach the right answer while misperceiving visual evidence. We address this process-level misalignment with PaLMR, a framework that aligns not only outcomes but also the reasoning process itself. PaLMR comprises two complementary components: a perception-aligned data layer that constructs process-aware reasoning data with structured pseudo-ground-truths and verifiable visual facts, and a process-aligned optimisation layer that constructs a hierarchical reward fusion scheme with a process-aware scoring function to encourage visually faithful chains-of-thought and improve training stability. Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL-7B show that our approach substantially reduces reasoning hallucinations and improves visual reasoning fidelity, achieving state-of-the-art results on HallusionBench while maintaining strong performance on MMMU, MathVista, and MathVerse. These findings indicate that PaLMR offers a principled and practical route to process-aligned multimodal reasoning, advancing the reliability and interpretability of MLLMs.
Related papers
- CORA: Analyzing and bridging thinking-answer gap in Multimodal RLVR via Consistency-Oriented Reasoning Alignment [32.29376299423774]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has successfully elicited the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>Existing methods primarily focus on improving the visual coverage of reasoning traces and mitigating visual hallucinations, but underestimate the semantic inconsistency between the reasoning process and the final answer.<n>We propose Consistency-Oriented Reasoning Alignment (CORA), which introduces thinking-answer semantic consistency into RLVR through a lightweight plug-and-play consistency reward model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-12T17:54:59Z) - Enhancing Multimodal In-Context Learning via Inductive-Deductive Reasoning [65.15766304205657]
In-context learning (ICL) allows large models to adapt to tasks using a few examples, yet its extension to vision-language models (VLMs) remains fragile.<n>Our analysis reveals that the fundamental limitation lies in an inductive gap, models often produce correct answers from flawed reasoning.<n>We introduce a framework that restructures multimodal ICL as a principled inductive-deductive process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T09:18:19Z) - V-tableR1: Process-Supervised Multimodal Table Reasoning with Critic-Guided Policy Optimization [30.74548183895207]
We introduce V-tableR1, a process-supervised reinforcement learning framework that elicits rigorous, verifiable reasoning from multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n>V-tableR1 employs a specialized critic VLM to provide dense, step-level feedback on the explicit visual chain-of-thought generated by a policy VLM.<n>We show that V-tableR1 explicitly penalizes visual hallucinations and shortcut guessing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T16:44:33Z) - Bridging Perception and Reasoning: Token Reweighting for RLVR in Multimodal LLMs [51.60575965819268]
We propose a plug-and-play Token-Reweighting (ToR) strategy that explicitly models this interdependence.<n>ToR delivers consistent performance gains across multiple multi-modal reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-26T06:25:27Z) - Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of Optimization [48.98086817378953]
Long chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enables thorough exploration and deliberation.<n>Despite advances, long-CoT LLMs often exhibit suboptimal reasoning behaviors.<n>We introduce RePro, a novel approach to refine LLM reasoning during post-training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T17:41:08Z) - Reasoning Guided Embeddings: Leveraging MLLM Reasoning for Improved Multimodal Retrieval [25.629529312687694]
We propose Reasoning Guided Embeddings (RGE), which preserves the generative rationale process of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Our method first enables the model to perform structured rationale generation conditioned on the instruction, and then extracts representations after reasoning has unfolded.<n>Experiments on the MMEB benchmark show that reasoning-guided conditioning improves multimodal retrieval performance by 4.9% over the non-reasoning baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T08:44:47Z) - From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization [62.07990937720985]
Dimension-level Reward Model (DRM) is a new supervision framework for Large Language Models.<n>DRM evaluates the quality of a reasoning process along three fundamental, complementary, and interpretable dimensions.<n> Experimental results show that DRM provides effective supervision signals, guides the optimization of LLMs and enhances their reasoning ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T14:29:15Z) - Reasoning-Aligned Perception Decoupling for Scalable Multi-modal Reasoning [95.44766931218896]
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) still lag behind text-based reasoning.<n>We introduce Perception-Reasoning Decoupling, which modularizes the MLLM's reasoning component and makes it easily replaceable.<n>We propose a novel reinforcement learning algorithm called Visual Perception Optimization (VPO) to align the MLLM's perceptual output with the final reasoning task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T02:28:07Z) - SRPO: Enhancing Multimodal LLM Reasoning via Reflection-Aware Reinforcement Learning [45.28220409043598]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities in reasoning tasks, but struggle with complex problems requiring explicit self-reflection and self-correction.<n>Existing reflection methods are simplistic and struggle to generate meaningful and instructive feedback.<n>We propose Multimodal Self-Reflection enhanced reasoning with Group Relative Policy Optimization (SRPO), a two-stage reflection-aware reinforcement learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T14:21:44Z) - Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks.
We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture.
Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z) - Fact :Teaching MLLMs with Faithful, Concise and Transferable Rationales [102.54274021830207]
We introduce Fact, a novel paradigm designed to generate multimodal rationales that are faithful, concise, and transferable for teaching MLLMs.
We filter rationales that can be transferred to end-to-end paradigms from programming paradigms to guarantee transferability.
Our approach also reduces hallucinations owing to its high correlation between images and text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T07:20:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.