Improved Leakage Abuse Attacks in Searchable Symmetric Encryption with eBPF Monitoring
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07030v1
- Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 04:23:46 GMT
- Title: Improved Leakage Abuse Attacks in Searchable Symmetric Encryption with eBPF Monitoring
- Abstract summary: Searchable Symmetric Encryption (SSE) allows users to search over encrypted data stored on untrusted servers.<n> leakages have been shown to enable leakage abuse attacks.<n>Recent defenses have made such attacks harder to carry out.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Searchable Symmetric Encryption (SSE) allows users to search over encrypted data stored on untrusted servers, like cloud providers. While SSE hides the content of queries and documents, it still leaks patterns, such as how often a query is made. These leakages have been shown to enable leakage abuse attacks, but recent defenses have made such attacks harder to carry out. In this work, we explore how system-level monitoring using eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) can be used to uncover new forms of leakage that go beyond what is typically captured in SSE threat models. By observing low-level system behavior during search operations, we show that an attacker can gain additional insights into query behavior, document access, and processing flow. We define a new leakage pattern based on these observations and demonstrate how they can strengthen existing attacks. Our findings suggest that system-level leakages present a practical threat to SSE deployments and must be considered when designing defenses. This work serves as a step toward bridging the gap between theoretical SSE security and the realities of system-level exposure.
Related papers
- Understanding and Mitigating Prompt Leaking Attacks in Real-World LLM-Based Applications [57.33208520608409]
This paper presents a systematic study of prompt leaking in large language model (LLM)-based applications.<n>We find that over 80% of deployments leak system prompts under realistic adversarial queries.<n>We propose AREA, a practical defense that re-anchors the model's attention using an optimizable soft prompt.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T04:20:00Z) - Silent Egress: When Implicit Prompt Injection Makes LLM Agents Leak Without a Trace [0.0]
We show that adversarial instructions embedded in automatically generated URL previews can introduce a system-level risk that we refer to as silent egress.<n>Using a fully local and reproducible testbed, we demonstrate that a malicious web page can induce an agent to issue outbound requests that exfiltrate sensitive runtime context.<n>In 480 experimental runs with a qwen2.5:7b-based agent, the attack succeeds with high probability (P (egress) =0.89), and 95% of successful attacks are not detected by output-based safety checks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-25T22:26:23Z) - The Trojan Knowledge: Bypassing Commercial LLM Guardrails via Harmless Prompt Weaving and Adaptive Tree Search [58.8834056209347]
Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety guardrails to elicit harmful outputs.<n>We introduce the Correlated Knowledge Attack Agent (CKA-Agent), a dynamic framework that reframes jailbreaking as an adaptive, tree-structured exploration of the target model's knowledge base.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T07:05:23Z) - LeakSealer: A Semisupervised Defense for LLMs Against Prompt Injection and Leakage Attacks [7.115093658017371]
LeakSealer is a model-agnostic framework that combines static analysis for forensic insights with dynamic defenses in a Human-In-The-Loop pipeline.<n>We empirically evaluate LeakSealer under two scenarios: (1) jailbreak attempts, employing a public benchmark dataset, and (2) PII leakage, supported by a curated dataset of labeled LLM interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T13:04:28Z) - Exploiting Inaccurate Branch History in Side-Channel Attacks [54.218160467764086]
This paper examines how resource sharing and contention affect two widely implemented but underdocumented features: Bias-Free Branch Prediction and Branch History Speculation.<n>We show that these features can inadvertently modify the Branch History Buffer (BHB) update behavior and create new primitives that trigger malicious mis-speculations.<n>We present three novel attack primitives: two Spectre attacks, namely Spectre-BSE and Spectre-BHS, and a cross-privilege control flow side-channel attack called BiasScope.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T19:46:43Z) - Benchmarking Misuse Mitigation Against Covert Adversaries [80.74502950627736]
Existing language model safety evaluations focus on overt attacks and low-stakes tasks.<n>We develop Benchmarks for Stateful Defenses (BSD), a data generation pipeline that automates evaluations of covert attacks and corresponding defenses.<n>Our evaluations indicate that decomposition attacks are effective misuse enablers, and highlight stateful defenses as a countermeasure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T17:33:33Z) - Spill The Beans: Exploiting CPU Cache Side-Channels to Leak Tokens from Large Language Models [4.5987419425784966]
We introduce Spill The Beans, a novel application of cache side-channels to leak tokens generated by Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>A significant challenge is the massive size of LLMs, which, by nature of their compute intensive operation, quickly evicts embedding vectors from the cache.<n>Monitoring more tokens increases potential vocabulary leakage but raises the chance of missing cache hits due to eviction.<n>Our findings reveal a new vulnerability in LLM deployments, highlighting that even sophisticated models are susceptible to traditional side-channel attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-01T19:18:56Z) - Defeating Prompt Injections by Design [79.00910871948787]
CaMeL is a robust defense that creates a protective system layer around the Large Language Models.<n>To operate, CaMeL explicitly extracts the control and data flows from the (trusted) query.<n>To further improve security, CaMeL uses a notion of a capability to prevent the exfiltration of private data over unauthorized data flows.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-24T15:54:10Z) - Towards Copyright Protection for Knowledge Bases of Retrieval-augmented Language Models via Reasoning [58.57194301645823]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world personalized applications.<n>The valuable and often proprietary nature of the knowledge bases used in RAG introduces the risk of unauthorized usage by adversaries.<n>Existing methods that can be generalized as watermarking techniques to protect these knowledge bases typically involve poisoning or backdoor attacks.<n>We propose name for harmless' copyright protection of knowledge bases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T09:15:56Z) - EmInspector: Combating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Self-Supervised Learning Through Embedding Inspection [53.25863925815954]
Federated self-supervised learning (FSSL) has emerged as a promising paradigm that enables the exploitation of clients' vast amounts of unlabeled data.
While FSSL offers advantages, its susceptibility to backdoor attacks has not been investigated.
We propose the Embedding Inspector (EmInspector) that detects malicious clients by inspecting the embedding space of local models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T06:14:49Z) - Leakage-Abuse Attacks Against Forward and Backward Private Searchable Symmetric Encryption [13.057964839510596]
Dynamic searchable encryption (DSSE) enables a server to efficiently search and update over encrypted files.
To minimize the leakage during updates, a security notion named forward and backward privacy is expected for newly proposed DSSE schemes.
It remains underexplored whether forward and backward private DSSE is resilient against practical leakage-abuse attacks (LAAs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-09T06:39:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.