Social Proof is in the Pudding: The (Non)-Impact of Social Proof on Software Downloads
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07919v1
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 03:28:41 GMT
- Title: Social Proof is in the Pudding: The (Non)-Impact of Social Proof on Software Downloads
- Abstract summary: Bad actors can game social proof metrics to induce the use of malign software.<n>We study the question using two field experiments.<n>We find no detectable effect on subsequent downloads or on any measure of repository activity.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Open-source software is widely used in commercial applications. Pair that with the fact that when choosing open-source software for a new problem, developers often use social proof as a cue. These two facts raise concerns that bad actors can game social proof metrics to induce the use of malign software. We study the question using two field experiments. On the largest developer platform, GitHub, we buy 'stars' for a random set of GitHub repositories of new Python packages and estimate their impact on package downloads and broader repository activity. We find no discernible impact on downloads, nor on forks, pull requests, issues, or other measures of developer engagement. In another field experiment, we manipulate the number of human downloads for Python packages. Again, we find no detectable effect on subsequent downloads or on any measure of repository activity.
Related papers
- Why Authors and Maintainers Link (or Don't Link) Their PyPI Libraries to Code Repositories and Donation Platforms [83.16077040470975]
Metadata of libraries on the Python Package Index (PyPI) plays a critical role in supporting the transparency, trust, and sustainability of open-source libraries.<n>This paper presents a large-scale empirical study combining two targeted surveys sent to 50,000 PyPI authors and maintainers.<n>We analyze more than 1,400 responses using large language model (LLM)-based topic modeling to uncover key motivations and barriers related to linking repositories and donation platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T16:13:57Z) - Analyzing the Usage of Donation Platforms for PyPI Libraries [91.97201077607862]
This study analyzes the adoption of donation platforms in the PyPI ecosystem.<n> GitHub Sponsors is the dominant platform, though many PyPI-listed links are outdated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T10:27:31Z) - SocialED: A Python Library for Social Event Detection [53.928241775629566]
SocialED is a comprehensive, open-source Python library designed to support social event detection (SED) tasks.<n>It provides a unified API with detailed documentation, offering researchers and practitioners a complete solution for event detection in social media.<n>SocialED supports a wide range of preprocessing techniques, such as graph construction and tokenization, and includes standardized interfaces for training models and making predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T03:37:47Z) - Six Million (Suspected) Fake Stars in GitHub: A Growing Spiral of Popularity Contests, Spams, and Malware [52.84746696418136]
We present a systematic, global, and longitudinal measurement study of fake stars in GitHub.<n>We build StarScout, a scalable tool able to detect anomalous starring behaviors across all GitHub metadata between 2019 and 2024.<n>Analyzing the data collected using StarScout, we find that: (1) fake-star-related activities have rapidly surged in 2024; (2) the accounts and repositories in fake star campaigns have highly trivial activity patterns; and the majority of fake stars are used to promote short-lived phishing malware repositories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T03:03:58Z) - Impact of the Availability of ChatGPT on Software Development: A Synthetic Difference in Differences Estimation using GitHub Data [49.1574468325115]
ChatGPT is an AI tool that enhances software production efficiency.
We estimate ChatGPT's effects on the number of git pushes, repositories, and unique developers per 100,000 people.
These results suggest that AI tools like ChatGPT can substantially boost developer productivity, though further analysis is needed to address potential downsides such as low quality code and privacy concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T19:11:15Z) - Unveiling A Hidden Risk: Exposing Educational but Malicious Repositories
in GitHub [0.0]
We use ChatGPT to understand and annotate the content published in software repositories.
We carry out a systematic study on a collection of 35.2K GitHub repositories claimed to be created for educational purposes only.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T11:36:09Z) - Malicious Package Detection using Metadata Information [0.272760415353533]
We introduce a metadata-based malicious package detection model, MeMPtec.
MeMPtec extracts a set of features from package metadata information.
Our experiments indicate a significant reduction in both false positives and false negatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T06:54:57Z) - On the Feasibility of Cross-Language Detection of Malicious Packages in
npm and PyPI [6.935278888313423]
Malicious users started to spread malware by publishing open-source packages containing malicious code.
Recent works apply machine learning techniques to detect malicious packages in the npm ecosystem.
We present a novel approach that involves a set of language-independent features and the training of models capable of detecting malicious packages in npm and PyPI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T12:32:51Z) - pymdp: A Python library for active inference in discrete state spaces [52.85819390191516]
pymdp is an open-source package for simulating active inference in Python.
We provide the first open-source package for simulating active inference with POMDPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T12:18:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.