Deconstructing Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning: Towards a Unified Perception-Alignment-Reasoning Paradigm

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08291v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:11:00 GMT
• Title: Deconstructing Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning: Towards a Unified Perception-Alignment-Reasoning Paradigm
• Abstract summary: Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (MMR) has attracted increasing attention for its capability to solve mathematical problems that involve both textual and visual modalities.<n>Current models still face significant challenges in real-world visual math tasks.
• Score: 82.57296908195654
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (MMR) has recently attracted increasing attention for its capability to solve mathematical problems that involve both textual and visual modalities. However, current models still face significant challenges in real-world visual math tasks. They often misinterpret diagrams, fail to align mathematical symbols with visual evidence, and produce inconsistent reasoning steps. Moreover, existing evaluations mainly focus on checking final answers rather than verifying the correctness or executability of each intermediate step. To address these limitations, a growing body of recent research addresses these issues by integrating structured perception, explicit alignment, and verifiable reasoning within unified frameworks. To establish a clear roadmap for understanding and comparing different MMR approaches, we systematically study them around four fundamental questions: (1) What to extract from multimodal inputs, (2) How to represent and align textual and visual information, (3) How to perform the reasoning, and (4) How to evaluate the correctness of the overall reasoning process. Finally, we discuss open challenges and offer perspectives on promising directions for future research.

Related papers

• Look on Demand: A Cognitive Scheduling Framework for Visual Evidence Acquisition in Multimodal Reasoning [82.86343313807158]
  We argue that a central challenge is how and when visual evidence is introduced into the reasoning process.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose CSMR, a multimodal reasoning framework in which a language model controls the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T08:43:13Z)
• SpatialMath: Spatial Comprehension-Infused Symbolic Reasoning for Mathematical Problem-Solving [17.304596904197204]
  Multimodal Small-to-Medium sized Language Models (MSLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in integrating visual and textual information.<n>Current models struggle to accurately decompose intricate visual inputs and connect geometric perception with structured reasoning.<n>We propose SpatialMath, a novel Spatial-Infused Reasoning Framework designed to integrate spatial representations into structured symbolic reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T15:31:20Z)
• What MLLMs Learn about When they Learn about Multimodal Reasoning: Perception, Reasoning, or their Integration? [46.836858357488296]
  Multimodal reasoning models have recently shown promise on challenging domains such as olympiad-level geometry.<n>We introduce MathLens, a benchmark designed to disentangle the subskills of multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T06:58:29Z)
• From Perception to Cognition: A Survey of Vision-Language Interactive Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [66.36007274540113]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) strive to achieve a profound, human-like understanding of and interaction with the physical world.<n>They often exhibit a shallow and incoherent integration when acquiring information (Perception) and conducting reasoning (Cognition)<n>This survey introduces a novel and unified analytical framework: From Perception to Cognition"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:25:40Z)
• VisioMath: Benchmarking Figure-based Mathematical Reasoning in LMMs [31.007061220012954]
  We present groundingMath, a curated benchmark of 1,800 high-quality K-12 mathematics problems in which all candidate answers are diagrams with subtle visual similarities.<n>A comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LMMs, covering both leading closed-source systems and widely adopted open-source models, reveals a consistent decline in accuracy as inter-image similarity increases.<n>We explore three alignment-oriented strategies, spanning training-free approaches and finetuning, to achieve substantial accuracy gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T09:24:13Z)
• Explain with Visual Keypoints Like a Real Mentor! A Benchmark for Multimodal Solution Explanation [19.4261670152456]
  We introduce the multimodal solution explanation task, designed to evaluate whether models can identify visual keypoints, such as auxiliary lines, points, angles, and generate explanations that incorporate these key elements essential for understanding.<n>Our empirical results show that, aside from recent large-scale open-source and closed-source models, most generalist open-source models, and even math-specialist models, struggle with the multimodal solution explanation task.<n>This highlights a significant gap in current LLMs' ability to reason and explain with visual grounding in educational contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T06:03:13Z)
• Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
  Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains.<n>This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z)
• Visualizing Thought: Conceptual Diagrams Enable Robust Planning in LMMs [59.66595230543127]
  Conceptual diagrams externalize mental models, abstracting irrelevant details to efficiently capture how entities interact.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large MultiModal Models (LMMs) predominantly reason through text.<n>We propose Visual Thinking, a generalizable framework that enables LMMs to reason through multiple chains of self-generated conceptual diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T18:27:02Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.