CRED: Counterfactual Reasoning and Environment Design for Active Preference Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08531v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 16:01:54 GMT
• Title: CRED: Counterfactual Reasoning and Environment Design for Active Preference Learning
• Abstract summary: Active preference learning learns human reward functions by presenting trajectories for ranking.<n>We propose CRED, a novel trajectory generation method for APL that improves reward inference by jointly optimizing environment design and trajectory selection.<n>CRED significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in reward accuracy and sample efficiency and receives higher user ratings.
• Score: 42.8490230146573
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As a robot's operational environment and tasks to perform within it grow in complexity, the explicit specification and balancing of optimization objectives to achieve a preferred behavior profile moves increasingly farther out of reach. These systems benefit strongly by being able to align their behavior to reflect human preferences and respond to corrections, but manually encoding this feedback is infeasible. Active preference learning (APL) learns human reward functions by presenting trajectories for ranking. However, existing methods sample from fixed trajectory sets or replay buffers that limit query diversity and often fail to identify informative comparisons. We propose CRED, a novel trajectory generation method for APL that improves reward inference by jointly optimizing environment design and trajectory selection to efficiently query and extract preferences from users. CRED "imagines" new scenarios through environment design and leverages counterfactual reasoning -- by sampling possible rewards from its current belief and asking "What if this were the true preference?" -- to generate trajectory pairs that expose differences between competing reward functions. Comprehensive experiments and a user study show that CRED significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in reward accuracy and sample efficiency and receives higher user ratings.

Related papers

• Specifying Reward Functions for RL Without Environment Sampling [17.422547104774647]
  We introduce Experience-Free Autonomous Reward Specification (EARS), a method for learning reward functions from preferences without environment interaction.<n>We evaluate EARS on three long-horizon domains: pandemic lockdown regulation design, insulin administration for diabetes patients, and autonomous vehicle control on a highway.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T13:28:52Z)
• Reward Score Matching: Unifying Reward-based Fine-tuning for Flow and Diffusion Models [54.597200388738656]
  Reward-based fine-tuning aims to steer a pretrained diffusion or flow-based generative model toward higher-reward samples.<n>We show that many can be written under a common framework, which we call reward score matching (RSM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T12:47:52Z)
• Chain of Uncertain Rewards with Large Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [52.48243762705385]
  Chain of Uncertain Rewards (CoUR) is a novel framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) to streamline reward function design and evaluation.<n>We show that CoUR achieves better performance and significantly lowers the cost of reward evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T05:44:14Z)
• PROF: An LLM-based Reward Code Preference Optimization Framework for Offline Imitation Learning [29.373324685358753]
  We propose PROF, a framework to generate and improve executable reward function codes from natural language descriptions and a single expert trajectory.<n>We also propose Reward Preference Ranking (RPR), a novel reward function quality assessment and ranking strategy without requiring environment interactions or RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T14:38:02Z)
• RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution [50.171320156632866]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback offers a promising approach to aligning large language models with human preferences.<n>Current reward models operate as sequence-to-one models, allocating a single, sparse, and delayed reward to an entire output sequence.<n>We propose a more fine-grained, token-level guidance approach for RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T02:45:21Z)
• ICPL: Few-shot In-context Preference Learning via LLMs [15.84585737510038]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) have native preference-learning capabilities that allow them to achieve sample-efficient preference learning.<n>We propose In-Context Preference Learning (ICPL), which uses in-context learning capabilities of LLMs to reduce human query inefficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T17:53:34Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• A Generalized Acquisition Function for Preference-based Reward Learning [12.158619866176487]
  Preference-based reward learning is a popular technique for teaching robots and autonomous systems how a human user wants them to perform a task. Previous works have shown that actively synthesizing preference queries to maximize information gain about the reward function parameters improves data efficiency. We show that it is possible to optimize for learning the reward function up to a behavioral equivalence class, such as inducing the same ranking over behaviors, distribution over choices, or other related definitions of what makes two rewards similar.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T20:32:17Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world.<n>Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences.<n>We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Behavior Alignment via Reward Function Optimization [23.92721220310242]
  We introduce a new framework that integrates auxiliary rewards reflecting a designer's domain knowledge with the environment's primary rewards. We evaluate our method's efficacy on a diverse set of tasks, from small-scale experiments to high-dimensional control challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T13:45:07Z)
• Basis for Intentions: Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Past Experience [89.30876995059168]
  inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior. This paper addresses the problem of IRL -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T17:29:49Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.