The uncloneable bit exists
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08916v1
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 20:33:33 GMT
- Title: The uncloneable bit exists
- Abstract summary: We establish quantum uncloneable encryption with unconditional security.<n>We prevent two non-communicating adversaries from simultaneously decrypting a single ciphertext $-$ even when both are given the key.
- Score: 0.5352699766206808
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We establish quantum uncloneable encryption with unconditional security, preventing two non-communicating adversaries from simultaneously decrypting a single ciphertext $-$ even when both are given the key. Our construction achieves security that approaches the ideal limit at a rate that is exponentially small in the security parameter, without employing any assumptions. Our proof invokes quantum information principles in the fully quantum realm, in a novel setting of cryptography. A decoupling step certifies the statistical independence needed for randomness extraction, and monogamy of entanglement, formalised via strong subadditivity, rules out the sender being highly correlated with two non-communicating adversaries at once. Consequently, no coordinated strategy beats random guessing of the encrypted bit, establishing unconditional uncloneability. This reveals the existence of an uncloneable bit in Nature and delineates a fundamental, physically enforced cryptographic primitive unavailable in classical settings.
Related papers
- (Quantum) Indifferentiability and Pre-Computation [50.06591179629447]
Indifferentiability is a cryptographic paradigm for analyzing the security of ideal objects.
Despite its strength, indifferentiability is not known to offer security against pre-processing attacks.
We propose a strengthening of indifferentiability which is not only composable but also takes arbitrary pre-computation into account.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T00:41:47Z) - Quantum digital signature based on single-qubit without a trusted third-party [45.41082277680607]
We propose a novel quantum digital signature protocol without a trusted third-party.<n>We prove that the protocol has information-theoretical unforgeability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T09:49:29Z) - Revocable Encryption, Programs, and More: The Case of Multi-Copy Security [48.53070281993869]
We show the feasibility of revocable primitives, such as revocable encryption and revocable programs.<n>This suggests that the stronger notion of multi-copy security is within reach in unclonable cryptography.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T02:37:40Z) - Simultaneous Haar Indistinguishability with Applications to Unclonable Cryptography [5.360892674012226]
We present a new approach to unclonable encryption via a reduction to a novel question about nonlocal quantum state discrimination.
Our main technical result is showing that the players cannot distinguish between each player receiving independently-chosen Haar random states versus all players receiving the same Haar random state.
We also show other implications to single-decryptor encryption and leakage-resilient secret sharing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T17:30:55Z) - Coding-Based Hybrid Post-Quantum Cryptosystem for Non-Uniform Information [53.85237314348328]
We introduce for non-uniform messages a novel hybrid universal network coding cryptosystem (NU-HUNCC)
We show that NU-HUNCC is information-theoretic individually secured against an eavesdropper with access to any subset of the links.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T12:12:39Z) - Revocable Cryptography from Learning with Errors [61.470151825577034]
We build on the no-cloning principle of quantum mechanics and design cryptographic schemes with key-revocation capabilities.
We consider schemes where secret keys are represented as quantum states with the guarantee that, once the secret key is successfully revoked from a user, they no longer have the ability to perform the same functionality as before.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T18:58:11Z) - Device-independent uncloneable encryption [0.0]
We introduce a variant of uncloneable encryption in which several possible decryption keys can decrypt a particular encryption.<n>We show that this variant of uncloneable encryption can be achieved device-independently.<n>We show that a simple modification of our scheme yields a single-decryptor encryption scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T16:17:01Z) - On the Feasibility of Unclonable Encryption, and More [16.64327673223307]
We show that encryption schemes satisfying unclonable indistinguishability exist unconditionally in the quantum random oracle model.
We also establish the feasibility of copy-protection for single-bit output point functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T01:03:56Z) - Quantum Proofs of Deletion for Learning with Errors [91.3755431537592]
We construct the first fully homomorphic encryption scheme with certified deletion.
Our main technical ingredient is an interactive protocol by which a quantum prover can convince a classical verifier that a sample from the Learning with Errors distribution in the form of a quantum state was deleted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T10:07:32Z) - Limitations on Uncloneable Encryption and Simultaneous One-Way-to-Hiding [17.660958043781154]
We study uncloneable quantum encryption schemes for classical messages.
We focus on the information-theoretic setting and give several limitations on the structure and security of these schemes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-26T15:12:10Z) - Asymptotic security analysis of teleportation based quantum cryptography [0.0]
We prove that the teleportation based quantum cryptography protocol presented in [Opt. Commun 283, 184] is secure against all types of individual and collective attacks.
We then investigate modifications to that protocol leading to greater secret-key rates and to security against coherent attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T17:54:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.