Democratising Clinical AI through Dataset Condensation for Classical Clinical Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09356v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:36:39 GMT
- Title: Democratising Clinical AI through Dataset Condensation for Classical Clinical Models
- Abstract summary: We learn a compact synthetic dataset that enables models to match the performance of full-data training, prioritising utility over distributional fidelity.<n>While typically explored for computational efficiency, DC also holds promise for healthcare data democratisation.
- Score: 16.611044957412563
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Dataset condensation (DC) learns a compact synthetic dataset that enables models to match the performance of full-data training, prioritising utility over distributional fidelity. While typically explored for computational efficiency, DC also holds promise for healthcare data democratisation, especially when paired with differential privacy, allowing synthetic data to serve as a safe alternative to real records. However, existing DC methods rely on differentiable neural networks, limiting their compatibility with widely used clinical models such as decision trees and Cox regression. We address this gap using a differentially private, zero-order optimisation framework that extends DC to non-differentiable models using only function evaluations. Empirical results across six datasets, including both classification and survival tasks, show that the proposed method produces condensed datasets that preserve model utility while providing effective differential privacy guarantees - enabling model-agnostic data sharing for clinical prediction tasks without exposing sensitive patient information.
Related papers
- Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z) - Intervention Efficiency and Perturbation Validation Framework: Capacity-Aware and Robust Clinical Model Selection under the Rashomon Effect [8.16102315566872]
coexistence of multiple models with comparable performance poses fundamental challenges for trustworthy deployment and evaluation.<n>We propose two complementary tools for robust model assessment and selection: Intervention Efficiency (IE) and the Perturbation Validation Framework (PVF)<n>IE is a capacity-aware metric that quantifies how efficiently a model identifies actionable true positives when only limited interventions are feasible.<n>PVF introduces a structured approach to assess the stability of models under data perturbations, identifying models whose performance remains most invariant across noisy or shifted validation sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T10:21:07Z) - Prototype-Guided Diffusion for Digital Pathology: Achieving Foundation Model Performance with Minimal Clinical Data [6.318463500874778]
We propose a prototype-guided diffusion model to generate high-fidelity synthetic pathology data at scale.<n>Our approach ensures biologically and diagnostically meaningful variations in the generated data.<n>We demonstrate that self-supervised features trained on our synthetic dataset achieve competitive performance despite using 60x-760x less data than models trained on large real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T21:17:39Z) - Domain Adaptive Diabetic Retinopathy Grading with Model Absence and Flowing Data [45.75724873443564]
Domain shift poses a significant challenge in clinical applications, e.g., Diabetic Retinopathy grading.<n>We propose a novel approach, Generative Unadversarial ExampleS (GUES), which enables adaptation from a data-centric perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T07:14:25Z) - Masked Clinical Modelling: A Framework for Synthetic and Augmented Survival Data Generation [1.7769033811751995]
We present Masked Clinical Modelling (MCM), a framework inspired by masked language modelling.
MCM is designed for both data synthesis and conditional data augmentation.
We evaluate this prototype on the WHAS500 dataset using Cox Proportional Hazards models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T08:38:46Z) - How Good Are Synthetic Medical Images? An Empirical Study with Lung
Ultrasound [0.3312417881789094]
Adding synthetic training data using generative models offers a low-cost method to deal with the data scarcity challenge.
We show that training with both synthetic and real data outperforms training with real data alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T15:42:53Z) - TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic
Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment.
In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials.
We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z) - Medical Federated Model with Mixture of Personalized and Sharing
Components [31.068735334318088]
We propose a new personalized framework of federated learning to handle the problem.
It successfully yields personalized models based on awareness of similarity between local data.
Also, we propose an effective method to reduce the computational cost, which improves computation efficiency significantly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-26T07:50:32Z) - Application of federated learning techniques for arrhythmia
classification using 12-lead ECG signals [0.11184789007828977]
This work uses a Federated Learning (FL) privacy-preserving methodology to train AI models over heterogeneous sets of high-definition ECG.
We demonstrated comparable performance to models trained using CL, IID, and non-IID approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-23T14:21:16Z) - Efficient training of lightweight neural networks using Online
Self-Acquired Knowledge Distillation [51.66271681532262]
Online Self-Acquired Knowledge Distillation (OSAKD) is proposed, aiming to improve the performance of any deep neural model in an online manner.
We utilize k-nn non-parametric density estimation technique for estimating the unknown probability distributions of the data samples in the output feature space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-26T14:01:04Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Autoregressive Score Matching [113.4502004812927]
We propose autoregressive conditional score models (AR-CSM) where we parameterize the joint distribution in terms of the derivatives of univariable log-conditionals (scores)
For AR-CSM models, this divergence between data and model distributions can be computed and optimized efficiently, requiring no expensive sampling or adversarial training.
We show with extensive experimental results that it can be applied to density estimation on synthetic data, image generation, image denoising, and training latent variable models with implicit encoders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-24T07:01:24Z) - Self-Training with Improved Regularization for Sample-Efficient Chest
X-Ray Classification [80.00316465793702]
We present a deep learning framework that enables robust modeling in challenging scenarios.
Our results show that using 85% lesser labeled data, we can build predictive models that match the performance of classifiers trained in a large-scale data setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T02:36:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.