Probing the Reliability of Driving VLMs: From Inconsistent Responses to Grounded Temporal Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09512v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:12:28 GMT
• Title: Probing the Reliability of Driving VLMs: From Inconsistent Responses to Grounded Temporal Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs), when applied as driving assistants, can response consistantly and understand how present observations shape future outcomes.<n>We find that models with strong visual understanding do not necessarily perform best on tasks requiring temporal reasoning.<n>We propose a simple yet effective self-supervised tuning approach with chain-of-thought reasoning that improves both consistency and temporal reasoning without requiring temporal labels.
• Score: 17.08518699175473
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A reliable driving assistant should provide consistent responses based on temporally grounded reasoning derived from observed information. In this work, we investigate whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs), when applied as driving assistants, can response consistantly and understand how present observations shape future outcomes, or whether their outputs merely reflect patterns memorized during training without temporally grounded reasoning. While recent efforts have integrated VLMs into autonomous driving, prior studies typically emphasize scene understanding and instruction generation, implicitly assuming that strong visual interpretation naturally enables consistant future reasoning and thus ensures reliable decision-making, a claim we critically examine. We focus on two major challenges limiting VLM reliability in this setting: response inconsistency, where minor input perturbations yield different answers or, in some cases, responses degenerate toward near-random guessing, and limited temporal reasoning, in which models fail to reason and align sequential events from current observations, often resulting in incorrect or even contradictory responses. Moreover, we find that models with strong visual understanding do not necessarily perform best on tasks requiring temporal reasoning, indicating a tendency to over-rely on pretrained patterns rather than modeling temporal dynamics. To address these issues, we adopt existing evaluation methods and introduce FutureVQA, a human-annotated benchmark dataset specifically designed to assess future scene reasoning. In addition, we propose a simple yet effective self-supervised tuning approach with chain-of-thought reasoning that improves both consistency and temporal reasoning without requiring temporal labels.

Related papers

• From Prompts to Pavement Through Time: Temporal Grounding in Agentic Scene-to-Plan Reasoning [1.2777067998526854]
  This work explores whether temporal conditioning within inter-agent communication can preserve or enhance coherence without introducing degradation in semantic or logical consistency.<n>Results show that while temporal conditioning reshapes reasoning style, it yields no statistically significant improvements in standard NLP-based correctness metrics.<n>These findings clarify the limits of prompt-based temporal grounding and establish the first empirical benchmark for temporal scene-to-plan reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T13:18:35Z)
• Instruct-ICL: Instruction-Guided In-Context Learning for Post-Disaster Damage Assessment [0.0]
  Training task-specific models for post-disaster assessment is often time-consuming and computationally expensive.<n>Pretrained multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative for post-disaster visual question answering (VQA)<n>We investigate whether structured reasoning strategies can improve the reliability of pretrained MLLMs for post-disaster VQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T02:48:43Z)
• Tracking the Truth: Object-Centric Spatio-Temporal Monitoring for Video Large Language Models [154.39583176906893]
  Large language models (MLs) have advanced understanding, they remain highly prone to hallucinations in scenes.<n>We argue this stems from a failure intemporal monitoring, the ability to persistently track object dynamic identities, states, and relations over time.<n>Existing benchmarks obscure this deficit relying on single final-answer queries that can often be resolved via local visual cues or statistical priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T14:32:36Z)
• AdapTime: Enabling Adaptive Temporal Reasoning in Large Language Models [65.97075015662318]
  AdapTime is an adaptive temporal reasoning method that dynamically executes reasoning steps based on the input context.<n>It integrates seamlessly with state-of-the-art LLMs and significantly enhances their temporal reasoning capabilities without relying on external support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T08:34:40Z)
• A Progressive Training Strategy for Vision-Language Models to Counteract Spatio-Temporal Hallucinations in Embodied Reasoning [49.61652671596548]
  "Multi-image hallucination reasoning", where a massive performance drop between forward and temporal queries reveals a dependence on superficial shortcuts instead of genuine understanding.<n>To mitigate this, we develop a new dataset: Chain-of-temporal building on detailed reasoning into Chain steps and definitive judgments.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that this approach not only improves accuracy but also the forward-backward performance gap from over 70% to only 6.53%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T07:48:44Z)
• Early Stopping for Large Reasoning Models via Confidence Dynamics [55.67938134245981]
  Large reasoning models rely on long chain-of-thought generation to solve complex problems.<n>Key challenge is determining when the model should stop reasoning and produce the final answer.<n>We propose CoDE-Stop, an early stopping method that leverages the dynamics of intermediate answer confidence to decide when to terminate reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T17:59:45Z)
• The Cost of Reasoning: Chain-of-Thought Induces Overconfidence in Vision-Language Models [1.5001933823689926]
  We show that reasoning consistently degrades the quality of most uncertainty estimates.<n>We identify implicit answer conditioning as the primary mechanism.<n>In contrast, agreement-based consistency remains robust and often improves under reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T16:12:06Z)
• Recursive Think-Answer Process for LLMs and VLMs [54.52289112197118]
  We propose an efficient Recursive Think-Answer Process (R-TAP)<n>R-TAP enables models to engage in iterative reasoning cycles and generate more accurate answers.<n>We show that R-TAP-enhanced models consistently outperform conventional single-pass methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T17:20:10Z)
• Saliency-Aware Multi-Route Thinking: Revisiting Vision-Language Reasoning [50.62037276161025]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) aim to reason by jointly leveraging visual and textual modalities.<n>Key obstacle is that visual inputs are typically provided only once at the start of generation.<n>We propose emphSaliency-Aware Principle (SAP) selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T18:49:56Z)
• TTSR: Test-Time Self-Reflection for Continual Reasoning Improvement [7.122068644799895]
  Test-time Training enables model adaptation using only test questions.<n>We propose textbfTTSR, a self-reflective test-time self-evolving training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T18:55:40Z)
• Addressing Overthinking in Large Vision-Language Models via Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization [56.59356959631999]
  Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization (GPRO) is a meta-reasoning controller that dynamically routes computation among three decision paths.<n>GPRO substantially improves both accuracy and efficiency, outperforming recent slow-thinking methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T23:05:17Z)
• Video-R2: Reinforcing Consistent and Grounded Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models [56.851611990473174]
  Reasoning over dynamic visual content remains a central challenge for large language models.<n>We propose a reinforcement learning approach that enhances both temporal precision and reasoning consistency.<n>The resulting model, Video R2, achieves consistently higher TAC, VAS, and accuracy across multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T18:59:58Z)
• Improving Temporal Understanding Logic Consistency in Video-Language Models via Attention Enhancement [44.654178762186824]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate self-contradictory outputs.<n>Video-language models (Video-LLMs) fail to provide consistent responses to logically rephrased questions.<n>We propose an attention enhancement method called Temporally Conditioned Attention Sharpening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T12:22:06Z)
• Self-Consistency as a Free Lunch: Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models via Self-Reflection [71.8243083897721]
  Vision-language models often hallucinate details, generating non-existent objects or inaccurate attributes that compromise output reliability.<n>We present a novel framework that leverages the model's self-consistency between long responses and short answers to generate preference pairs for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T10:37:11Z)
• What's Missing in Vision-Language Models? Probing Their Struggles with Causal Order Reasoning [26.671128120554457]
  causal reasoning is fundamental to solving complex high-level reasoning tasks.<n>Existing benchmarks often include a mixture of reasoning questions.<n>We introduce VQA-Causal and VCR-Causal to isolate and rigorously evaluate causal reasoning abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:17:46Z)
• Back to the Future: Towards Explainable Temporal Reasoning with Large Language Models [33.8108950744839]
  We introduce the first task of explainable temporal reasoning, to predict an event's occurrence at a future timestamp based on context. We show that our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance of temporal prediction and explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T10:35:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.