What's Missing in Vision-Language Models? Probing Their Struggles with Causal Order Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00869v1
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 07:17:46 GMT
• Title: What's Missing in Vision-Language Models? Probing Their Struggles with Causal Order Reasoning
• Authors: Zhaotian Weng, Haoxuan Li, Kuan-Hao Huang, Jieyu Zhao,
• Abstract summary: causal reasoning is fundamental to solving complex high-level reasoning tasks.<n>Existing benchmarks often include a mixture of reasoning questions.<n>We introduce VQA-Causal and VCR-Causal to isolate and rigorously evaluate causal reasoning abilities.
• Score: 26.671128120554457
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the impressive performance of vision-language models (VLMs) on downstream tasks, their ability to understand and reason about causal relationships in visual inputs remains unclear. Robust causal reasoning is fundamental to solving complex high-level reasoning tasks, yet existing benchmarks often include a mixture of reasoning questions, and VLMs can frequently exploit object recognition and activity identification as shortcuts to arrive at the correct answers, making it challenging to truly assess their causal reasoning abilities. To bridge this gap, we introduce VQA-Causal and VCR-Causal, two new benchmarks specifically designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate VLMs' causal reasoning abilities. Our findings reveal that while VLMs excel in object and activity recognition, they perform poorly on causal reasoning tasks, often only marginally surpassing random guessing. Further analysis suggests that this limitation stems from a severe lack of causal expressions in widely used training datasets, where causal relationships are rarely explicitly conveyed. We additionally explore fine-tuning strategies with hard negative cases, showing that targeted fine-tuning can improve model's causal reasoning while maintaining generalization and downstream performance. Our study highlights a key gap in current VLMs and lays the groundwork for future work on causal understanding.

Related papers

• Caption This, Reason That: VLMs Caught in the Middle [3.4820139118440676]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable progress in visual understanding in recent years.<n>They still lag behind human capabilities in specific visual tasks such as counting or relational reasoning.<n>We analyze VLM performance along core cognitive axes: Perception, Attention, and Memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T14:25:48Z)
• CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [10.530681458312412]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown impressive performance in tasks such as recognition and visual question answering.<n>We introduce a comprehensive causal reasoning benchmark for multi-modal in-context learning from LVLMs.<n>We evaluate the ability of state-of-the-art open-source LVLMs on our causal reasoning tasks across three causal representation learning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T00:45:15Z)
• VCRBench: Exploring Long-form Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Video Language Models [29.706347050700867]
  We introduce a novel benchmark named Video-based long-form Causal Reasoning (VCRBench)<n>VCRBench tests whether Large Video Language Models (LVLMs) can identify, reason about, and correctly sequence the events needed to accomplish a specific goal.<n>We propose Recognition-Reasoning Decomposition (RRD), a modular approach that breaks video-based causal reasoning into two sub-tasks of video recognition and causal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T11:35:58Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [52.478956204238315]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability.<n>We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought in Real-World Driving Scenarios [69.00444996464662]
  We propose RIV-CoT, a Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought method that enables vision-language models to reason using visual crops corresponding to relevant entities.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that RIV-CoT improves answer accuracy by 3.1% and reasoning accuracy by 4.6% over vanilla CoT prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:31:16Z)
• COLD: Causal reasOning in cLosed Daily activities [7.782872276680731]
  We propose the COLD (Causal reasOning in cLosed Daily activities) framework.<n>It is built upon human understanding of daily real-world activities to reason about the causal nature of events.<n>We show that the proposed framework facilitates the creation of enormous causal queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T06:37:13Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the causal reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) through the representative problem of inferring causal relationships from narratives.<n>We find that even state-of-the-art language models rely on unreliable shortcuts, both in terms of the narrative presentation and their parametric knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• From Pre-training Corpora to Large Language Models: What Factors Influence LLM Performance in Causal Discovery Tasks? [51.42906577386907]
  This study explores the factors influencing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in causal discovery tasks. A higher frequency of causal mentions correlates with better model performance, suggesting that extensive exposure to causal information during training enhances the models' causal discovery capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T01:45:05Z)
• A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning [73.77088902676306]
  We take a closer look at the self-verification abilities of large language models (LLMs) in the context of logical reasoning. Our main findings suggest that existing LLMs could struggle to identify fallacious reasoning steps accurately and may fall short of guaranteeing the validity of self-verification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T07:13:10Z)
• Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models [31.238220405009617]
  Exploiting large language models (LLMs) to tackle reasoning has garnered growing attention.<n>It still remains highly challenging to achieve satisfactory results in complex logical problems, characterized by plenty of premises within the context and requiring multi-hop reasoning.<n>In this work, we first examine the mechanism from the perspective of information flow and reveal that LLMs confront difficulties akin to human-like cognitive biases when dealing with disordered and irrelevant content in reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:47:49Z)
• Towards CausalGPT: A Multi-Agent Approach for Faithful Knowledge Reasoning via Promoting Causal Consistency in LLMs [55.66353783572259]
  Causal-Consistency Chain-of-Thought harnesses multi-agent collaboration to bolster the faithfulness and causality of foundation models.<n>Our framework demonstrates significant superiority over state-of-the-art methods through extensive and comprehensive evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T04:59:21Z)
• Causal Triplet: An Open Challenge for Intervention-centric Causal Representation Learning [98.78136504619539]
  Causal Triplet is a causal representation learning benchmark featuring visually more complex scenes. We show that models built with the knowledge of disentangled or object-centric representations significantly outperform their distributed counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T17:43:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.