A Unified Hierarchical Multi-Task Multi-Fidelity Framework for Data-Efficient Surrogate Modeling in Manufacturing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09842v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:06:01 GMT
- Title: A Unified Hierarchical Multi-Task Multi-Fidelity Framework for Data-Efficient Surrogate Modeling in Manufacturing
- Abstract summary: This paper develops a novel hierarchical multi-task multi-fidelity (H-MT-MF) framework for process-based surrogate modeling.<n>The proposed framework decomposes each task's response into a task-specific global trend and a residual local variability component that is jointly learned across tasks.<n>Compared to a state-of-the-art MTL model that does not account for fidelity information and a kriging model that learns tasks independently, the proposed approach improves prediction accuracy by up to 19% and 23%, respectively.
- Score: 5.837132313338578
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Surrogate modeling is an essential data-driven technique for quantifying relationships between input variables and system responses in manufacturing and engineering systems. Two major challenges limit its effectiveness: (1) large data requirements for learning complex nonlinear relationships, and (2) heterogeneous data collected from sources with varying fidelity levels. Multi-task learning (MTL) addresses the first challenge by enabling information sharing across related processes, while multi-fidelity modeling addresses the second by accounting for fidelity-dependent uncertainty. However, existing approaches typically address these challenges separately, and no unified framework simultaneously leverages inter-task similarity and fidelity-dependent data characteristics. This paper develops a novel hierarchical multi-task multi-fidelity (H-MT-MF) framework for Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling. The proposed framework decomposes each task's response into a task-specific global trend and a residual local variability component that is jointly learned across tasks using a hierarchical Bayesian formulation. The framework accommodates an arbitrary number of tasks, design points, and fidelity levels while providing predictive uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using a 1D synthetic example and a real-world engine surface shape prediction case study. Compared to (1) a state-of-the-art MTL model that does not account for fidelity information and (2) a stochastic kriging model that learns tasks independently, the proposed approach improves prediction accuracy by up to 19% and 23%, respectively. The H-MT-MF framework provides a general and extensible solution for surrogate modeling in manufacturing systems characterized by heterogeneous data sources.
Related papers
- AlignMamba-2: Enhancing Multimodal Fusion and Sentiment Analysis with Modality-Aware Mamba [56.52470564147458]
We propose textbfAlignMamba-2, an effective and efficient framework for multimodal fusion and sentiment analysis.<n>Our approach introduces a dual alignment strategy that regularizes the model using both Optimal Transport distance and Maximum Mean Discrepancy.<n>More importantly, we design a Modality-Aware Mamba layer, which employs a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with modality-specific and modality-shared experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T03:47:21Z) - Graph-Structured Deep Learning Framework for Multi-task Contention Identification with High-dimensional Metrics [7.231459004015238]
This study addresses the challenge of accurately identifying multi-task contention types in high-dimensional system environments.<n>It proposes a unified contention classification framework that integrates representation transformation, structural modeling, and a task decoupling mechanism.<n> Experiments conducted on a public system trace dataset demonstrate advantages in accuracy, recall, precision, and F1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T08:54:15Z) - D-Models and E-Models: Diversity-Stability Trade-offs in the Sampling Behavior of Large Language Models [91.21455683212224]
In large language models (LLMs), the probability of relevance for the next piece of information is linked to the probability of relevance for the next product.<n>But whether fine-grained sampling probabilities faithfully align with task requirements remains an open question.<n>We identify two model types: D-models, whose P_token exhibits large step-to-step variability and poor alignment with P_task; and E-models, whose P_token is more stable and better aligned with P_task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T14:59:09Z) - Multi-task Modeling for Engineering Applications with Sparse Data [3.0959031768743706]
This paper introduces an Multi-Task Gaussian Processes (MTGP) framework tailored for engineering systems characterized by multi-source, multi-fidelity data.<n>By quantifying and leveraging inter-task relationships, the proposed MTGP framework offers a robust and scalable solution for predictive modeling in domains with significant computational and experimental costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-09T16:28:19Z) - Heterogeneous Model Alignment in Digital Twin [0.0]
Key challenge in model-driven DTs is aligning heterogeneous models across abstraction layers.<n>Existing methods, relying on static mappings and manual updates, are often inflexible, error-prone, and risk compromising data integrity.<n>We present a heterogeneous model alignment approach for multi-layered, model-driven DTs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T10:36:55Z) - SE-Merging: A Self-Enhanced Approach for Dynamic Model Merging [60.83635006372403]
textttSE-Merging is a self-enhanced model merging framework.<n>We show that textttSE-Merging achieves dynamic model merging without additional training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-22T18:38:41Z) - Activation-Guided Consensus Merging for Large Language Models [25.68958388022476]
We present textbfActivation-Guided textbfConsensus textbfMerging (textbfACM), a plug-and-play merging framework that determines layer-specific merging coefficients.<n>Experiments on Long-to-Short (L2S) and general merging tasks demonstrate that ACM consistently outperforms all baseline methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T07:04:01Z) - Large Language Model as Meta-Surrogate for Data-Driven Many-Task Optimization: A Proof-of-Principle Study [11.452011929848844]
This study proposes a novel meta-surrogate framework to assist many-task optimization.<n>We formulate a unified framework for many-task fitness prediction, by defining a universal model with metadata to fit a group of problems.<n>Our framework supports dual-level knowledge transfer -- at both the surrogate and individual levels -- enhancing optimization efficiency and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-11T11:13:11Z) - Task Groupings Regularization: Data-Free Meta-Learning with Heterogeneous Pre-trained Models [83.02797560769285]
Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to derive knowledge from a collection of pre-trained models without accessing their original data.<n>Current methods often overlook the heterogeneity among pre-trained models, which leads to performance degradation due to task conflicts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T13:11:55Z) - Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Meta-Learning [99.56612787882334]
Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to efficiently learn new tasks by leveraging multiple pre-trained models without requiring their original training data.
For the first time, we reveal two major challenges hindering their practical deployments: Task-Distribution Shift ( TDS) and Task-Distribution Corruption (TDC)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T15:46:54Z) - AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learning [68.75885518081357]
This paper introduces an innovative technique called Adaptive Model Merging (AdaMerging)
It aims to autonomously learn the coefficients for model merging, either in a task-wise or layer-wise manner, without relying on the original training data.
Compared to the current state-of-the-art task arithmetic merging scheme, AdaMerging showcases a remarkable 11% improvement in performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T04:26:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.