Influencing LLM Multi-Agent Dialogue via Policy-Parameterized Prompts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09890v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:47:25 GMT
• Title: Influencing LLM Multi-Agent Dialogue via Policy-Parameterized Prompts
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether prompt-as-action can be parameterized so as to construct a lightweight policy.<n>We evaluate the dialogue flow based on five indicators: responsiveness, rebuttal, evidence usage, non-repetition, and stance shift.
• Score: 3.473277059746767
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for multi-agent systems. However, existing research on the behaviour of LLM-based multi-agents relies on ad hoc prompts and lacks a principled policy perspective. Different from reinforcement learning, we investigate whether prompt-as-action can be parameterized so as to construct a lightweight policy which consists of a sequence of state-action pairs to influence conversational behaviours without training. Our framework regards prompts as actions executed by LLMs, and dynamically constructs prompts through five components based on the current state of the agent. To test the effectiveness of parameterized control, we evaluated the dialogue flow based on five indicators: responsiveness, rebuttal, evidence usage, non-repetition, and stance shift. We conduct experiments using different LLM-driven agents in two discussion scenarios related to the general public and show that prompt parameterization can influence the dialogue dynamics. This result shows that policy-parameterised prompts offer a simple and effective mechanism to influence the dialogue process, which will help the research of multi-agent systems in the direction of social simulation.

Related papers

• Belief Cascades Drive Persuasion in LLM Agent Networks [71.17605142402785]
  We study how goal-directed persuaders shift elicited stances in networks of LLM agents grounded in real-world ego-network topologies.<n>We show that direct exposure reliably predicts next-round stance change in competing runs, and peer relays carry smaller but measurable influence.<n>These results argue for evaluating multi-agent persuasion as a trajectory- and exposure-level process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T21:01:19Z)
• Agentic Conversational Search with Contextualized Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [66.52010873968383]
  We introduce a conversational agent that interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through reinforcement learning (RL) training.<n>The experimental results across four widely used conversational benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T14:55:54Z)
• DEBATE: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Role-Playing LLM Agents in Multi-Agent, Long-Form Debates [10.609797175227644]
  We introduce DEBATE, the first large-scale empirical benchmark to evaluate the authenticity of the interaction between multi-agent role-playing LLMs.<n>We systematically evaluate and identify critical discrepancies between simulated and authentic group dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T02:21:10Z)
• Dynamic benchmarking framework for LLM-based conversational data capture [0.0]
  This paper introduces a benchmarking framework to assess large language models (LLMs)<n>It integrates generative agent simulation to evaluate performance on key dimensions: information extraction, context awareness, and adaptive engagement.<n>Results show that adaptive strategies improve data extraction accuracy, especially when handling ambiguous responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T15:47:47Z)
• ChatSOP: An SOP-Guided MCTS Planning Framework for Controllable LLM Dialogue Agents [52.7201882529976]
  We propose SOP-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) planning framework to enhance controllability of dialogue agents.<n>To enable this, we curate a dataset comprising SOP-annotated multi-scenario dialogues, generated using a semi-automated role-playing system with GPT-4o.<n>We also propose a novel method that integrates Chain of Thought reasoning with supervised fine-tuning for SOP prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T12:23:02Z)
• Rethinking ChatGPT's Success: Usability and Cognitive Behaviors Enabled by Auto-regressive LLMs' Prompting [5.344199202349884]
  We analyze the structure of modalities within both two types of Large Language Models and six task-specific channels during deployment. We examine the stimulation of diverse cognitive behaviors in LLMs through the adoption of free-form text and verbal contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T00:19:41Z)
• Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key? [84.36332588191623]
  We propose a novel group discussion framework to enrich the set of discussion mechanisms. We observe that the multi-agent discussion performs better than a single agent only when there is no demonstration in the prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T12:04:05Z)
• Plug-and-Play Policy Planner for Large Language Model Powered Dialogue Agents [121.46051697742608]
  We introduce a new dialogue policy planning paradigm to strategize dialogue problems with a tunable language model plug-in named PPDPP. Specifically, we develop a novel training framework to facilitate supervised fine-tuning over available human-annotated data. PPDPP consistently and substantially outperforms existing approaches on three different proactive dialogue applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T03:20:16Z)
• Self-Explanation Prompting Improves Dialogue Understanding in Large Language Models [52.24756457516834]
  We propose a novel "Self-Explanation" prompting strategy to enhance the comprehension abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) This task-agnostic approach requires the model to analyze each dialogue utterance before task execution, thereby improving performance across various dialogue-centric tasks. Experimental results from six benchmark datasets confirm that our method consistently outperforms other zero-shot prompts and matches or exceeds the efficacy of few-shot prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T15:41:34Z)
• Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration [72.04629217161656]
  This work focuses on three aspects of proactive dialogue systems: clarification, target-guided, and non-collaborative dialogues. To trigger the proactivity of LLMs, we propose the Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T02:49:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.