Evaluating Adjective-Noun Compositionality in LLMs: Functional vs Representational Perspectives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09994v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 22:43:30 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Adjective-Noun Compositionality in LLMs: Functional vs Representational Perspectives
• Abstract summary: How do large language models (LLMs) do on compositional tasks?<n>We evaluate adjective-noun compositionality in LLMs using two complementary setups: prompt-based functional assessment and a representational analysis of internal model states.
• Score: 34.2401259846238
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Compositionality is considered central to language abilities. As performant language systems, how do large language models (LLMs) do on compositional tasks? We evaluate adjective-noun compositionality in LLMs using two complementary setups: prompt-based functional assessment and a representational analysis of internal model states. Our results reveal a striking divergence between task performance and internal states. While LLMs reliably develop compositional representations, they fail to translate consistently into functional task success across model variants. Consequently, we highlight the importance of contrastive evaluation for obtaining a more complete understanding of model capabilities.

Related papers

• Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding [88.11781604392606]
  This paper defines language representation as the linguistic and symbolic constructs used to map and model the real world.<n>We argue that shaping schemas through advanced language representation is the next frontier for expanding Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T02:42:29Z)
• Predictive Regularization Against Visual Representation Degradation in Multimodal Large Language Models [84.94288033791346]
  We conduct a detailed diagnostic analysis to unveil a pervasive issue: visual representation degradation in MLLMs.<n>We attribute this phenomenon to a visual sacrifice driven by the singular text-generation objective, where the model compromises its visual fidelity to optimize for answer generation.<n>We propose Predictive Regularization to force degraded intermediate features to predict initial visual features, thereby maintaining the inherent visual attributes of the MLLM's internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T13:10:37Z)
• On the Entity-Level Alignment in Crosslingual Consistency [62.33186691736433]
  SubSub and SubInj integrate English translations of subjects into prompts across languages, leading to substantial gains in factual recall accuracy and consistency.<n>These interventions reinforce the entity representation alignment in the conceptual space through model's internal pivot-language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:26:50Z)
• A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models [50.34089812436633]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, yet their internal mechanisms remain largely opaque.<n> mechanistic interpretability has attracted significant attention from the research community as a means to understand the inner workings of LLMs.<n>Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising method due to their ability to disentangle the complex, superimposed features within LLMs into more interpretable components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:38:00Z)
• Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Discrepancy between Performance and Competence [49.60849499134362]
  This study investigates the linguistic understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) regarding signifier (form) and signified (meaning)<n>We introduce a neurolinguistic approach, utilizing a novel method that combines minimal pair and diagnostic probing to analyze activation patterns across model layers.<n>We found: (1) Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic methods reveal that language performance and competence are distinct; (2) Direct probability measurement may not accurately assess linguistic competence; and (3) Instruction tuning won't change much competence but improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T04:16:44Z)
• From Words to Worlds: Compositionality for Cognitive Architectures [45.254578970023196]
  Large language models (LLMs) are very performant connectionist systems, but do they exhibit more compositionality? We present empirical analyses across four LLM families and three task categories, including a novel task introduced below.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T11:42:13Z)
• Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
  This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z)
• Can Large Language Models Understand Context? [17.196362853457412]
  This paper introduces a context understanding benchmark by adapting existing datasets to suit the evaluation of generative models. Experimental results indicate that pre-trained dense models struggle with understanding more nuanced contextual features when compared to state-of-the-art fine-tuned models. As LLM compression holds growing significance in both research and real-world applications, we assess the context understanding of quantized models under in-context-learning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:55:29Z)
• Understanding the Inner Workings of Language Models Through Representation Dissimilarity [5.987278280211877]
  representation dissimilarity measures are functions that measure the extent to which two model's internal representations differ. Our results suggest that dissimilarity measures are a promising set of tools for shedding light on the inner workings of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T14:46:20Z)
• Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds [59.71218039095155]
  We evaluate language understanding capacities on simple inference tasks that most humans find trivial. We target (i) grammatically-specified entailments, (ii) premises with evidential adverbs of uncertainty, and (iii) monotonicity entailments. The models exhibit moderate to low performance on these evaluation sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:41:09Z)
• Emergent Linguistic Structures in Neural Networks are Fragile [20.692540987792732]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to have strong performance on natural language processing tasks. We propose a framework to assess the consistency and robustness of linguistic representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T15:43:57Z)
• Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning via Induced Model Sparsity [81.38804205212425]
  We consider simple language-conditioned navigation problems in a grid world environment with disentangled observations. We design an agent that encourages sparse correlations between words in the instruction and attributes of objects, composing them together to find the goal. Our agent maintains a high level of performance on goals containing novel combinations of properties even when learning from a handful of demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-06T08:46:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.