Disentangling Similarity and Relatedness in Topic Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10619v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 10:27:43 GMT
• Title: Disentangling Similarity and Relatedness in Topic Models
• Abstract summary: We show that different model families capture distinct semantic structure in their topics.<n>We apply this scorer to a comprehensive evaluation across multiple corpora and topic model families.<n>This paper establishes similarity and relatedness as essential axes for topic model evaluation and provides a reliable pipeline for characterising these across model families and corpora.
• Score: 6.597839688012534
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The recent advancement of large language models has spurred a growing trend of integrating pre-trained language model (PLM) embeddings into topic models, fundamentally reshaping how topics capture semantic structure. Classical models such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) derive topics from word co-occurrence statistics, whereas PLM-augmented models anchor these statistics to pre-trained embedding spaces, imposing a prior that also favours clustering of semantically similar words. This structural difference can be captured by the psycholinguistic dimensions of thematic relatedness and taxonomic similarity of the topic words. To disentangle these dimensions in topic models, we construct a large synthetic benchmark of word pairs using LLM-based annotation to train a neural scoring function. We apply this scorer to a comprehensive evaluation across multiple corpora and topic model families, revealing that different model families capture distinct semantic structure in their topics. We further demonstrate that similarity and relatedness scores successfully predict downstream task performance depending on task requirements. This paper establishes similarity and relatedness as essential axes for topic model evaluation and provides a reliable pipeline for characterising these across model families and corpora.

Related papers

• Geometry of Semantics in Next-Token Prediction: How Optimization Implicitly Organizes Linguistic Representations [34.88156871518115]
  Next-token prediction (NTP) optimization leads language models to extract and organize semantic structure from text.<n>We demonstrate that concepts corresponding to larger singular values are learned earlier during training, yielding a natural semantic hierarchy.<n>This insight motivates orthant-based clustering, a method that combines concept signs to identify interpretable semantic categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T08:46:04Z)
• Multivariate Gaussian Topic Modelling: A novel approach to discover topics with greater semantic coherence [3.6381860041528085]
  We propose a novel Multivariate Gaussian Topic Model (MGTM) to identify semantically coherent topics.<n>This approach is applied on 20 newsgroups dataset to demonstrate the interpretability benefits vis-a-vis 4 other benchmark models.<n>This model achieves a highest mean topic coherence (0.7) and median topic coherence (0.76) vis-a-vis the benchmark models, demonstrating high effectiveness in identifying interpretable, semantically coherent topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T09:25:54Z)
• The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
  Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline.<n>Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood.<n>The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z)
• Interactive Topic Models with Optimal Transport [75.26555710661908]
  We present EdTM, as an approach for label name supervised topic modeling. EdTM models topic modeling as an assignment problem while leveraging LM/LLM based document-topic affinities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T13:57:27Z)
• Rethinking the Construction of Effective Metrics for Understanding the Mechanisms of Pretrained Language Models [2.5863812709449543]
  We propose a novel line to constructing metrics for understanding the mechanisms of pretrained language models. Based on the experimental results, we propose a speculation regarding the working mechanism of BERT-like pretrained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T04:16:40Z)
• Topics in the Haystack: Extracting and Evaluating Topics beyond Coherence [0.0]
  We propose a method that incorporates a deeper understanding of both sentence and document themes. This allows our model to detect latent topics that may include uncommon words or neologisms. We present correlation coefficients with human identification of intruder words and achieve near-human level results at the word-intrusion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T12:24:25Z)
• On the Compositional Generalization Gap of In-Context Learning [73.09193595292233]
  We look at the gap between the in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) performance of such models in semantic parsing tasks with in-context learning. We evaluate four model families, OPT, BLOOM, CodeGen and Codex on three semantic parsing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:56:37Z)
• Testing Pre-trained Language Models' Understanding of Distributivity via Causal Mediation Analysis [13.07356367140208]
  We introduce DistNLI, a new diagnostic dataset for natural language inference. We find that the extent of models' understanding is associated with model size and vocabulary size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T00:33:28Z)
• Did the Cat Drink the Coffee? Challenging Transformers with Generalized Event Knowledge [59.22170796793179]
  Transformers Language Models (TLMs) were tested on a benchmark for the textitdynamic estimation of thematic fit Our results show that TLMs can reach performances that are comparable to those achieved by SDM. However, additional analysis consistently suggests that TLMs do not capture important aspects of event knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T20:52:26Z)
• A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
  We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT. The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous. We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z)
• High-order Semantic Role Labeling [86.29371274587146]
  This paper introduces a high-order graph structure for the neural semantic role labeling model. It enables the model to explicitly consider not only the isolated predicate-argument pairs but also the interaction between the predicate-argument pairs. Experimental results on 7 languages of the CoNLL-2009 benchmark show that the high-order structural learning techniques are beneficial to the strong performing SRL models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T15:33:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.