Technological Excellence Requires Human and Social Context

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10653v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:12:59 GMT
• Title: Technological Excellence Requires Human and Social Context
• Abstract summary: We propose a broader understanding of excellence that combines technical rigor with ethical robustness, social intelligibility, and long-term relevance.<n>This article examines five interconnected domains where the humanities and social sciences, treated as integrated dimensions of research practice, can strengthen technological development.
• Score: 0.12470603961665389
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Breakthrough technologies increasingly shape social institutions, economic systems, and political futures. Yet models of research excellence associated with such technologies often prioritize technical performance, scalability, and short-term innovation metrics while treating ethical, social, and cultural dimensions as secondary considerations. This perspective article argues that such separation is no longer tenable. We propose a broader understanding of excellence that combines technical rigor with ethical robustness, social intelligibility, and long-term relevance. The rapid emergence of generative and agentic artificial intelligence further underscores this argument. As technological systems increasingly operate through language, interpretation, and normative alignment, expertise traditionally cultivated in the humanities and social sciences becomes integral to the design, governance, and responsible deployment of such systems. Drawing on historical examples and contemporary research practices, this article examines five interconnected domains where the humanities and social sciences, treated as integrated dimensions of research practice, can strengthen technological development: (1) ethical, legal, and social integration in agenda-setting and research design; (2) plural and reflexive foresight practices that shape technological futures; (3) graduate education as a leverage point for cross-disciplinary literacy; (4) visualization and communication as epistemic and civic practices; and (5) institutional frameworks that move beyond rigid distinctions between basic and applied research. Across these dimensions, we propose practical strategies for embedding interdisciplinary collaboration structurally rather than symbolically.

Related papers

• Fairness Across Fields: Comparing Software Engineering and Human Sciences Perspectives [2.470815298095903]
  This study challenges the limits of software engineering approaches to fairness by analyzing how fairness is conceptualized in the human sciences.<n>We conducted two secondary studies, exploring 45 articles on algorithmic fairness in software engineering and 25 articles on fairness from the humanities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-29T22:27:34Z)
• Understanding AI Trustworthiness: A Scoping Review of AIES & FAccT Articles [41.419459280691605]
  Trustworthy AI serves as a foundational pillar for two major AI ethics conferences: AIES and FAccT.<n>This scoping review aims to examine how the AIES and FAccT communities conceptualize, measure, and validate AI trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T09:40:38Z)
• Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents [63.03252293761656]
  This paper systematically reviews the technologies, applications, and evaluation methods of industry agents based on large language models (LLMs)<n>We examine the three key technological pillars that support the advancement of agent capabilities: Memory, Planning, and Tool Use.<n>We provide an overview of the application of industry agents in real-world domains such as digital engineering, scientific discovery, embodied intelligence, collaborative business execution, and complex system simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T12:46:55Z)
• The AI Literacy Heptagon: A Structured Approach to AI Literacy in Higher Education [41.99844472131922]
  The study aims to bridge the gap between theoretical AIL conceptualizations and the practical implementation in academic curricula.<n>Our analysis identifies seven central dimensions of AIL: technical, applicational, critical thinking, ethical, social, integrational, and legal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T11:28:30Z)
• Intersectoral Knowledge in AI and Urban Studies: A Framework for Transdisciplinary Research [0.0]
  This article proposes a six-dimensional framework for assessing and strengthening transdisciplinary knowledge validity in AI and city studies.<n>Specifically, the framework classifies research according to ontological, orientations, methodological, positivological, axiological, and valorization dimensions.<n>Less common stances, such as idealism, mixed methods, and cultural valorization, are also examined for their potential to enrich knowledge production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T23:35:09Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Towards an Ethical and Inclusive Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Multidimensional Framework [0.0]
  This article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence on contemporary society and the importance of adopting an ethical approach to its development and implementation within organizations. Various actors, such as governments, academics, and civil society, can play a role in shaping the development of AI aligned with human and social values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T19:43:51Z)
• Advancing Social Intelligence in AI Agents: Technical Challenges and Open Questions [67.60397632819202]
  Building socially-intelligent AI agents (Social-AI) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal research goal. We identify a set of underlying technical challenges and open questions for researchers across computing communities to advance Social-AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T02:57:42Z)
• Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical Futures [3.909878683245887]
  Information retrieval research must understand and contend with the social implications of the technology it produces.<n>The community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T17:43:08Z)
• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• Responsible and Inclusive Technology Framework: A Formative Framework to Promote Societal Considerations in Information Technology Contexts [1.9991645269305982]
  This paper contributes a formative framework -- the Responsible and Inclusive Technology Framework -- that orients critical reflection around the social contexts of technology creation and use. We expect that the implementation of the Responsible and Inclusive Technology framework, especially in business-to-business industry settings, will serve as a catalyst for more intentional and socially-grounded practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T18:59:04Z)
• Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions [68.6358773622615]
  This paper provides an overview of the computational and theoretical foundations of multimodal machine learning. We propose a taxonomy of 6 core technical challenges: representation, alignment, reasoning, generation, transference, and quantification. Recent technical achievements will be presented through the lens of this taxonomy, allowing researchers to understand the similarities and differences across new approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T19:21:19Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.