Beyond Accuracy: Reliability and Uncertainty Estimation in Convolutional Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10731v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 13:05:15 GMT
• Title: Beyond Accuracy: Reliability and Uncertainty Estimation in Convolutional Neural Networks
• Abstract summary: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become integral to a wide range of scientific and practical applications.<n>Despite their accuracy, DNNs frequently exhibit poor calibration, often assigning overly confident probabilities to incorrect predictions.<n>This limitation underscores the growing need for integrated mechanisms that provide reliable uncertainty estimation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become integral to a wide range of scientific and practical applications due to their flexibility and strong predictive performance. Despite their accuracy, however, DNNs frequently exhibit poor calibration, often assigning overly confident probabilities to incorrect predictions. This limitation underscores the growing need for integrated mechanisms that provide reliable uncertainty estimation. In this article, we compare two prominent approaches for uncertainty quantification: a Bayesian approximation via Monte Carlo Dropout and the nonparametric Conformal Prediction framework. Both methods are assessed using two convolutional neural network architectures; H-CNN VGG16 and GoogLeNet, trained on the Fashion-MNIST dataset. The empirical results show that although H-CNN VGG16 attains higher predictive accuracy, it tends to exhibit pronounced overconfidence, whereas GoogLeNet yields better-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Conformal Prediction additionally demonstrates consistent validity by producing statistically guaranteed prediction sets, highlighting its practical value in high-stakes decision-making contexts. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of evaluating model performance beyond accuracy alone and contribute to the development of more reliable and trustworthy deep learning systems.

Related papers

• Beyond Prediction: Interval Neural Networks for Uncertainty-Aware System Identification [6.5745172279769255]
  This paper presents a systematic framework for constructing and training interval Neural Networks (INNs) for uncertainty-aware SysID.<n>We develop Interval LSTM and NODE models that propagate uncertainty through interval arithmetic without probabilistic assumptions.<n>For training, we propose two strategies: Cascade INN (C-INN), a two-stage approach converting a trained crisp NN into an INN, and Joint INN (J-INN), a one-stage framework jointly optimizing prediction accuracy and interval precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T03:19:07Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Graph Neural Networks: A Multi-Hop Evidence Fusion Approach [55.43914153271912]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) excel in graph representation learning by integrating graph structure and node features.<n>Existing GNNs fail to account for the uncertainty of class probabilities that vary with the depth of the model, leading to unreliable and risky predictions in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel Evidence Fusing Graph Neural Network (EFGNN for short) to achieve trustworthy prediction, enhance node classification accuracy, and make explicit the risk of wrong predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T03:59:38Z)
• Quantifying Calibration Error in Neural Networks Through Evidence-Based Theory [1.9832598896178517]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for quantifying the trustworthiness of neural networks by incorporating subjective logic into the evaluation of Expected Error (ECE)<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets where post-calibration results indicate improved trustworthiness.<n>The proposed framework offers a more interpretable and nuanced assessment of AI models, with potential applications in sensitive domains such as healthcare and autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T23:54:21Z)
• Beyond Uncertainty Quantification: Learning Uncertainty for Trust-Informed Neural Network Decisions - A Case Study in COVID-19 Classification [7.383605511698832]
  Reliable uncertainty quantification is critical in high-stakes applications, such as medical diagnosis.<n>Traditional uncertainty quantification methods rely on a predefined confidence threshold to classify predictions as confident or uncertain.<n>This approach assumes that predictions exceeding the threshold are trustworthy, while those below it are uncertain, without explicitly assessing the correctness of high-confidence predictions.<n>This study proposes an uncertainty-aware stacked neural network, which extends conventional uncertainty quantification by learning when predictions should be trusted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T04:20:12Z)
• Error-Driven Uncertainty Aware Training [7.702016079410588]
  Error-Driven Uncertainty Aware Training aims to enhance the ability of neural classifiers to estimate their uncertainty correctly. The EUAT approach operates during the model's training phase by selectively employing two loss functions depending on whether the training examples are correctly or incorrectly predicted. We evaluate EUAT using diverse neural models and datasets in the image recognition domains considering both non-adversarial and adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T11:48:14Z)
• Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks: A Survey [47.785948021510535]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been extensively used in various real-world applications.<n>However, the predictive uncertainty of GNNs stemming from diverse sources can lead to unstable and erroneous predictions.<n>This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the GNNs from the perspective of uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T21:54:52Z)
• Learning to Predict Trustworthiness with Steep Slope Loss [69.40817968905495]
  We study the problem of predicting trustworthiness on real-world large-scale datasets. We observe that the trustworthiness predictors trained with prior-art loss functions are prone to view both correct predictions and incorrect predictions to be trustworthy. We propose a novel steep slope loss to separate the features w.r.t. correct predictions from the ones w.r.t. incorrect predictions by two slide-like curves that oppose each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T19:19:09Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Deep Calibrated Salient Object Detection [74.58153220370527]
  Existing deep neural network based salient object detection (SOD) methods mainly focus on pursuing high network accuracy. These methods overlook the gap between network accuracy and prediction confidence, known as the confidence uncalibration problem. We introduce an uncertaintyaware deep SOD network, and propose two strategies to prevent deep SOD networks from being overconfident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T23:28:36Z)
• Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence Functions [121.10450359856242]
  We develop a frequentist procedure that utilizes influence functions of a model's loss functional to construct a jackknife (or leave-one-out) estimator of predictive confidence intervals. The DJ satisfies (1) and (2), is applicable to a wide range of deep learning models, is easy to implement, and can be applied in a post-hoc fashion without interfering with model training or compromising its accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T13:36:52Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.