Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11103v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:23:20 GMT
• Title: Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
• Score: 66.89012795621349
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in code generation, they often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering. We attribute this limitation to the nature of standard pre-training data: static software repositories represent only the terminal state of an intricate intellectual process, abstracting away the intermediate planning, debugging, and iterative refinement. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction. We hypothesize that reverse-engineering the latent agentic trajectories -- the planning, reasoning, and debugging steps -- behind static repositories provides a far richer supervision signal than raw code alone. To operationalize this, we introduce a framework that synthesizes these trajectories using a multi-agent simulation. This process is grounded in the structural realities of the source repositories (e.g., dependency graphs and file hierarchies) to ensure fidelity. Furthermore, to guarantee the logical rigor of the synthetic data, we employ a search-based optimization technique that iteratively refines the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to maximize the likelihood of the ground-truth code. Empirical results demonstrate that continuous pre-training on these reconstructed trajectories significantly enhances Llama-3-8B's performance across diverse benchmarks, including long-context understanding, coding proficiency, and agentic capabilities.

Related papers

• The Imitation Game: When LLMs Learn to Reason Like Programs via Code-Centric Reasoning Data Synthesis [50.473217152006875]
  MIMIC is a framework that leverages executable code as a rigorous medium for reasoning data synthesis.<n>MIMIC transforms algorithms into verifiable reasoning trajectories through narrative fusion, code-guided test synthesis, and dynamic code instrumentation.<n>Our method significantly elevates accuracy across general reasoning, complex mathematical benchmarks, and fine-grained deterministic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-13T17:04:16Z)
• Reward-Driven LLM Agent Workflows: Synthesizing POMDP Routing and Self-Correction for Autonomous Decision-Making [0.0]
  This paper addresses key technical challenges in current large language model (LLM) agent applications, including long-horizon planning, sparse reward attribution, and dynamic environmental interaction.<n>The proposed architecture is based on the synthesis of core AI paradigms: Visual, Language, Generative, Graph, Multimodal, Reinforcement, and Agent Intelligence.<n>Ultimately, the resulting architecture offers a practical, scalable reference framework for developing artificial intelligence technologies in complex, multi-step autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T02:51:41Z)
• Back to the Beginning of Heuristic Design: Bridging Code and Knowledge with LLMs [8.10827298136302]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced automatic design (AHD) for optimization (CO)<n>Most existing approaches search over executable programs and distill insights from execution feedback to guide later iterations.<n>We argue that knowledge becomes the primary search object and code merely instantiates and tests it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T12:30:58Z)
• LOGIGEN: Logic-Driven Generation of Verifiable Agentic Tasks [4.6880826836662814]
  We introduce textbfLOGIGEN, a logic-driven framework that synthesizes verifiable training data.<n>On $2$-Bench, LOGIGEN-32B(RL) achieves a textbf79.5% success rate, substantially outperforming the base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T08:35:30Z)
• Advances and Frontiers of LLM-based Issue Resolution in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Survey [59.3507264893654]
  Issue resolution is a complex Software Engineering task integral to real-world development.<n> benchmarks like SWE-bench revealed this task as profoundly difficult for large language models.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of this emerging domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T18:55:03Z)
• DeepCode: Open Agentic Coding [11.7906174865581]
  DeepCode is a fully autonomous framework for document-to-codebase synthesis.<n>It orchestrates four information operations to maximize task-relevant signals under finite context budgets.<n>Extensive evaluations on the PaperBench benchmark demonstrate that DeepCode achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T16:07:13Z)
• MM-HELIX: Boosting Multimodal Long-Chain Reflective Reasoning with Holistic Platform and Adaptive Hybrid Policy Optimization [103.74675519953898]
  Long-chain reflective reasoning is a prerequisite for solving complex real-world problems.<n>We build a benchmark consisting 1,260 samples of 42 challenging synthetic tasks.<n>We generate post-training data and explore learning paradigms for exploiting such data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:53:58Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation: A Survey with Focus on Repository-Level Approaches [6.740646039135986]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm that integrates external retrieval mechanisms with LLMs.<n>We provide a comprehensive review of research on Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation (RACG), with an emphasis on repository-level approaches.<n>Our goal is to establish a unified analytical framework for understanding this rapidly evolving field and to inspire continued progress in AI-powered software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T15:20:03Z)
• RationAnomaly: Log Anomaly Detection with Rationality via Chain-of-Thought and Reinforcement Learning [27.235259453535537]
  RationAnomaly is a novel framework that enhances log anomaly detection by synergizing Chain-of-Thought fine-tuning with reinforcement learning.<n>We have released the corresponding resources, including code and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T07:35:58Z)
• READER: Retrieval-Assisted Drafter for Efficient LLM Inference [0.0386965802948046]
  Autoregressive Language Models instantiate a factorized likelihood over token sequences, yet their strictly sequential decoding process imposes an intrinsic lower bound on latency inference.<n>This bottleneck has emerged as a central obstacle to the scalable deployment of large-scale generative models.<n>We present READER, a speculative decoding framework that bypasses the training of the auxiliary draft model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T16:47:48Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• End-to-End Meta-Bayesian Optimisation with Transformer Neural Processes [52.818579746354665]
  This paper proposes the first end-to-end differentiable meta-BO framework that generalises neural processes to learn acquisition functions via transformer architectures. We enable this end-to-end framework with reinforcement learning (RL) to tackle the lack of labelled acquisition data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T10:58:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.