Back to the Beginning of Heuristic Design: Bridging Code and Knowledge with LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06123v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 12:30:58 GMT
- Title: Back to the Beginning of Heuristic Design: Bridging Code and Knowledge with LLMs
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced automatic design (AHD) for optimization (CO)<n>Most existing approaches search over executable programs and distill insights from execution feedback to guide later iterations.<n>We argue that knowledge becomes the primary search object and code merely instantiates and tests it.
- Score: 8.10827298136302
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced automatic heuristic design (AHD) for combinatorial optimization (CO), where candidate heuristics are iteratively proposed, evaluated, and refined. Most existing approaches search over executable programs and distill insights from execution feedback to guide later iterations. Because this process moves from low-level implementations to high-level principles, we refer to it as a bottom-up paradigm. We argue that this view is incomplete and introduce a complementary top-down perspective: knowledge becomes the primary search object and code merely instantiates and tests it, making what is learned explicit and reusable across problems and trajectories. We formalize this shift through a statistical-learning view that exposes a distortion--compression trade-off, and instantiate it in both population-based and tree-based AHD frameworks. Across CO and tasks beyond it, knowledge-first search improves discovery efficiency, transfer, and generalization, often outperforming code-centric pipelines, while combining both strategies yields further gains. Our results suggest that progress in AHD depends on iteratively constructing and evolving interpretable hypotheses that retain value beyond a single search trajectory.
Related papers
- Evolution of Optimization Methods: Algorithms, Scenarios, and Evaluations [98.44542103979735]
First-order gradient descent methods, epitomized by gradient descent (SGD) and Adam, serve as the cornerstone of modern training pipelines.<n>Large-scale model training, stringent privacy requirements, and distributed learning paradigms expose critical limitations in these conventional approaches regarding privacy protection and memory efficiency.<n>We retrospectively analyze the evolutionary trajectory of deep learning optimization algorithms and present a comprehensive empirical evaluation of mainstreams across diverse model architectures and training scenarios.<n>We distill key emerging trends and fundamental design trade-offs, pinpointing promising directions for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T17:01:36Z) - Insight-V++: Towards Advanced Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models [65.4947731385794]
We present a unified multi-agent visual reasoning framework that evolves from our foundational image-centric model, Insight-V.<n>We introduce two novel algorithms, ST-GRPO and J-GRPO, which enhance spatial-temporal reasoning and improve evaluative robustness.<n>Experiments on base models like LLaVA-NeXT and Qwen2.5-VL demonstrate significant performance gains across challenging image and video reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-18T15:28:07Z) - Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z) - Contrastive Concept-Tree Search for LLM-Assisted Algorithm Discovery [10.823958143531685]
Large language Model (LLM)-assisted algorithm discovery is an iterative, black-box optimization process over programs.<n>Here, we introduce Contrastive Concept-Tree Search (CCTS), which extracts a hierarchical concept representation from the generated programs.<n>We show that CCTS improves search efficiency over fitness-based baselines and produces interpretable, task-specific concept trees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T05:41:35Z) - Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - PROPA: Toward Process-level Optimization in Visual Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [30.44007644340425]
We introduce PROPA, a novel framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with GRPO to generate dense, process-level rewards and optimize reasoning at each intermediate step without human annotations.<n>Across seven benchmarks and four VLM backbones, PROPA consistently outperforms both SFT- and RLVR-based baselines.<n>It achieves up to 17.0% gains on in-domain tasks and 21.0% gains on out-of-domain tasks compared to existing state-of-the-art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T13:06:12Z) - TopoSizing: An LLM-aided Framework of Topology-based Understanding and Sizing for AMS Circuits [7.615431299673158]
Traditional black-box optimization achieves sampling efficiency but lacks circuit understanding.<n>We propose TopoSizing, an end-to-end framework that performs robust circuit understanding directly from raw netlists.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-17T16:52:46Z) - Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning [56.496001894673235]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective at enhancing the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals that puzzling phenomena like aha moments", length-scaling'' and entropy dynamics are not disparate occurrences but hallmarks of an emergent reasoning hierarchy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-03T18:52:49Z) - Hierarchical Verification of Speculative Beams for Accelerating LLM Inference [0.0]
Hierarchical Verification Tree (HVT) is a novel framework that restructures speculative beam decoding by prioritizing high-likelihood drafts.<n>HVT consistently outperforms existing speculative decoding schemes, achieving substantial reductions in inference time and energy consumption.<n>Findings highlight the potential of hierarchical verification strategies as a new direction for accelerating large language model inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T02:58:03Z) - SoftPipe: A Soft-Guided Reinforcement Learning Framework for Automated Data Preparation [10.764970149373845]
We introduce SoftPipe, a novel RL framework that replaces rigid hard constraints'' with a flexible soft guidance'' paradigm.<n>We demonstrate that SoftPipe achieves up to a 13.9% improvement in pipeline quality and 2.8$times$ faster convergence compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-18T07:43:22Z) - Re-ranking Reasoning Context with Tree Search Makes Large Vision-Language Models Stronger [51.01841635655944]
Recent advancements in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have significantly improved performance in Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks.<n>Existing methods still face challenges, such as the scarcity of knowledge with reasoning examples and erratic responses from retrieved knowledge.<n>We propose a multimodal RAG framework, termed RCTS, which enhances LVLMs by constructing a Reasoning Context-enriched knowledge base and a Tree Search re-ranking method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T14:00:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.