The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off of Location Tracking in Ad Personalization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12374v1
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 18:52:18 GMT
- Title: The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off of Location Tracking in Ad Personalization
- Abstract summary: We show that geographical data is most valuable in the early cold-start stage, when behavioral histories are limited.<n>As users accumulate richer behavioral histories, however, the role of geographical data shifts.<n>These results highlight a central privacy-utility trade-off in ad personalization.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Firms collect vast amounts of behavioral and geographical data on individuals. While behavioral data captures an individual's digital footprint, geographical data reflects their physical footprint. Given the significant privacy risks associated with combining these data sources, it is crucial to understand their respective value and whether they act as complements or substitutes in achieving firms' business objectives. In this paper, we combine economic theory, machine learning, and causal inference to quantify the value of geographical data, the extent to which behavioral data can substitute for it, and the mechanisms through which it benefits firms. Using data from a leading in-app advertising platform in a large Asian country, we document that geographical data is most valuable in the early cold-start stage, when behavioral histories are limited. In this stage, geographical data complements behavioral data, improving targeting performance by almost 20%. As users accumulate richer behavioral histories, however, the role of geographical data shifts: it becomes largely substitutable, as behavioral data alone captures the relevant heterogeneity. These results highlight a central privacy-utility trade-off in ad personalization and inform managerial decisions about when location tracking creates value.
Related papers
- Towards Personalized Differentially Private Learning for Decentralized Local Graphs [62.244412935520025]
Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a promising solution for privacy-preserving data collection without relying on trusted servers.<n>Existing LDP-based graph learning methods typically assume uniform privacy requirements across users.<n>We propose PPGNN, a personalized differentially private framework for decentralized graph data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T08:07:48Z) - Data Bias in Human Mobility is a Universal Phenomenon but is Highly Location-specific [0.0]
We study data production', quantifying not only whether individuals are represented in big digital datasets, but also how they are represented in terms of how much data they produce.<n>We study GPS mobility data collected from anonymized smartphones for ten major US cities and find that data points can be more unequally distributed between users than wealth.<n>We build models to predict the number of data points we can expect to be produced by the composition of demographic groups living in census tracts, and find strong effects of wealth, ethnicity, and education on data production.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T20:19:50Z) - Establishing validated standards for Home and Work location Detection [0.0]
We present HoWDe, a robust algorithm for identifying home and work locations from mobility data.<n>Using two unique ground-truth datasets, HoWDe achieves home and work detection accuracies of up to 97% and 88%, respectively.<n>By supporting in-house pre-processing through a transparent and validated pipeline, HoWDe also facilitates the sharing of privacy-preserving mobility data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T15:21:57Z) - From "I have nothing to hide" to "It looks like stalking": Measuring Americans' Level of Comfort with Individual Mobility Features Extracted from Location Data [0.24999074238880484]
Location data collection has become widespread with smart phones becoming ubiquitous.<n>Data aggregators and data brokers offer access to individual location data.<n>The FTC has also started to vigorously regulate consumer privacy for location data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T20:34:18Z) - Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influence [100.91355498124527]
We formalize the concept of trajectory-specific leave-one-out influence, which quantifies the impact of removing a data point during training.<n>We propose data value embedding, a novel technique enabling efficient approximation of trajectory-specific LOO.<n>As data value embedding captures training data ordering, it offers valuable insights into model training dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T18:28:55Z) - Scaling Laws for the Value of Individual Data Points in Machine Learning [55.596413470429475]
We introduce a new perspective by investigating scaling behavior for the value of individual data points.
We provide learning theory to support our scaling law, and we observe empirically that it holds across diverse model classes.
Our work represents a first step towards understanding and utilizing scaling properties for the value of individual data points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T20:10:24Z) - Where you go is who you are -- A study on machine learning based
semantic privacy attacks [3.259843027596329]
We present a systematic analysis of two attack scenarios, namely location categorization and user profiling.
Experiments on the Foursquare dataset and tracking data demonstrate the potential for abuse of high-quality spatial information.
Our findings point out the risks of ever-growing databases of tracking data and spatial context data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:56:50Z) - PADME-SoSci: A Platform for Analytics and Distributed Machine Learning
for the Social Sciences [4.294774517325059]
PADME is a distributed analytics tool that federates model implementation and training.
It enables the analysis of data across locations while still allowing the model to be trained as if all data were in a single location.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-27T15:32:35Z) - Robust Self-Tuning Data Association for Geo-Referencing Using Lane Markings [44.4879068879732]
This paper presents a complete pipeline for resolving ambiguities during the data association.
Its core is a robust self-tuning data association that adapts the search area depending on the entropy of the measurements.
We evaluate our method on real data from urban and rural scenarios around the city of Karlsruhe in Germany.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-28T12:29:39Z) - Personalization Improves Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Federated
Optimization [57.98426940386627]
We show that coordinating local learning with private centralized learning yields a generically useful and improved tradeoff between accuracy and privacy.
We illustrate our theoretical results with experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-10T20:44:44Z) - Domain Adaptative Causality Encoder [52.779274858332656]
We leverage the characteristics of dependency trees and adversarial learning to address the tasks of adaptive causality identification and localisation.
We present a new causality dataset, namely MedCaus, which integrates all types of causality in the text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-27T04:14:55Z) - Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training
Dynamics [118.75207687144817]
We introduce Data Maps, a model-based tool to characterize and diagnose datasets.
We leverage a largely ignored source of information: the behavior of the model on individual instances during training.
Our results indicate that a shift in focus from quantity to quality of data could lead to robust models and improved out-of-distribution generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T20:19:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.