Balancing the privacy-utility trade-off: How to draw reliable conclusions from private data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12753v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:54:08 GMT
• Title: Balancing the privacy-utility trade-off: How to draw reliable conclusions from private data
• Abstract summary: We propose a new interpretation of the privacy-utility trade-off based on hypothesis testing.<n>We show that DP affects analytical validity by studying its impact on hypothesis tests commonly used to assess the statistical significance of empirical results.
• Score: 0.7252027234425333
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Absolute anonymization, conceived as an irreversible transformation that prevents re-identification and sensitive value disclosure, has proven to be a broken promise. Consequently, modern data protection must shift toward a privacy-utility trade-off grounded in risk mitigation. Differential Privacy (DP) offers a rigorous mathematical framework for balancing quantified disclosure risk with analytical usefulness. Nevertheless, widespread adoption remains limited, largely because effective translation of complex technical concepts, such as privacy-loss parameters, into forms meaningful to non-technical stakeholders has yet to be achieved. This difficulty arises from the inherent use of randomization: both legitimate analysts and potential adversaries must draw conclusions from uncertain observations rather than deterministic values. In this work, we propose a new interpretation of the privacy-utility trade-off based on hypothesis testing. This perspective explicitly accounts for the uncertainty introduced by randomized mechanisms in both membership inference scenarios and general data analysis. In particular, we introduce the concept of relative disclosure risk to quantify the maximum reduction in uncertainty an adversary can obtain from protected outputs, and we show that this measure is directly related to standard privacy-loss parameters. At the same time, we analyze how DP affects analytical validity by studying its impact on hypothesis tests commonly used to assess the statistical significance of empirical results. Finally, we provide practical guidance, accessible to non-experts, for navigating the privacy-utility trade-off, aiding in the selection of suitable protection mechanisms and the values for the privacy-loss parameters.

Related papers

• Privacy-Preserving Cohort Analytics for Personalized Health Platforms: A Differentially Private Framework with Stochastic Risk Modeling [0.0]
  cohort-based aggregation of health data introduces nontrivial privacy risks.<n>We present a privacy-preserving cohort analytics framework that combines deterministic cohort constraints, differential privacy mechanisms, and synthetic baseline generation.<n>Our results suggest that risk modeling complements formal privacy guarantees by providing interpretable, decision-relevant metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T16:59:41Z)
• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Confidential Guardian: Cryptographically Prohibiting the Abuse of Model Abstention [65.47632669243657]
  A dishonest institution can exploit mechanisms to discriminate or unjustly deny services under the guise of uncertainty.<n>We demonstrate the practicality of this threat by introducing an uncertainty-inducing attack called Mirage.<n>We propose Confidential Guardian, a framework that analyzes calibration metrics on a reference dataset to detect artificially suppressed confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T19:47:50Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• An applied Perspective: Estimating the Differential Identifiability Risk of an Exemplary SOEP Data Set [2.66269503676104]
  We show how to compute the risk metric efficiently for a set of basic statistical queries. Our empirical analysis based on an extensive, real-world scientific data set expands the knowledge on how to compute risks under realistic conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T17:50:55Z)
• From Mean to Extreme: Formal Differential Privacy Bounds on the Success of Real-World Data Reconstruction Attacks [54.25638567385662]
  Differential Privacy in machine learning is often interpreted as guarantees against membership inference.<n> translating DP budgets into quantitative protection against the more damaging threat of data reconstruction remains a challenging open problem.<n>This paper bridges the critical gap by deriving the first formal privacy bounds tailored to the mechanics of demonstrated "from-scratch" attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T09:52:30Z)
• Simulation-based Bayesian Inference from Privacy Protected Data [0.0]
  We propose simulation-based inference methods from privacy-protected datasets.<n>We illustrate our methods on discrete time-series data under an infectious disease model and with ordinary linear regression models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T14:34:17Z)
• An In-Depth Examination of Requirements for Disclosure Risk Assessment [6.0631983658449435]
  We argue that any proposal for quantifying disclosure risk should be based on pre-specified, objective criteria. We illustrate this approach, using simple desiderata, to evaluate the absolute disclosure risk framework. We conclude that satisfying all the desiderata is impossible, but counterfactual comparisons satisfy the most.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T20:36:29Z)
• On the Query Complexity of Training Data Reconstruction in Private Learning [0.0]
  We analyze the number of queries that a whitebox adversary needs to make to a private learner in order to reconstruct its training data. For $(epsilon, delta)$ DP learners with training data drawn from any arbitrary compact metric space, we provide the emphfirst known lower bounds on the adversary's query complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T00:49:38Z)
• Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with $f$-Differential Privacy [51.11280118806893]
  We consider a federated data analytics problem in which a server coordinates the collaborative data analysis of multiple users with privacy concerns and limited communication capability. We study the local differential privacy guarantees of discrete-valued mechanisms with finite output space through the lens of $f$-differential privacy (DP) More specifically, we advance the existing literature by deriving tight $f$-DP guarantees for a variety of discrete-valued mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T16:58:53Z)
• Information-Theoretic Safe Exploration with Gaussian Processes [89.31922008981735]
  We consider a sequential decision making task where we are not allowed to evaluate parameters that violate an unknown (safety) constraint. Most current methods rely on a discretization of the domain and cannot be directly extended to the continuous case. We propose an information-theoretic safe exploration criterion that directly exploits the GP posterior to identify the most informative safe parameters to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-09T15:23:58Z)
• Improved Generalization Guarantees in Restricted Data Models [16.193776814471768]
  Differential privacy is known to protect against threats to validity incurred due to adaptive, or exploratory, data analysis. We show that, under this assumption, it is possible to "re-use" privacy budget on different portions of the data, significantly improving accuracy without increasing the risk of overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T16:04:12Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Models [41.017707772150835]
  We show that prior work on membership inference attacks may severely underestimate the privacy risks. We first propose to benchmark membership inference privacy risks by improving existing non-neural network based inference attacks. We then introduce a new approach for fine-grained privacy analysis by formulating and deriving a new metric called the privacy risk score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T00:53:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.