Retrieval-Enhanced Real Estate Appraisal

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12986v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:36:55 GMT
• Title: Retrieval-Enhanced Real Estate Appraisal
• Abstract summary: The Sales Comparison Approach (SCA) is one of the most popular when it comes to real estate appraisal.<n>We show that the selection of comparables used in many state-of-the-art algorithms can be significantly improved by learning a selection policy.<n>All our evaluations are made on five datasets which span areas in the United States, Brazil, and France.
• Score: 0.8990485928963198
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The Sales Comparison Approach (SCA) is one of the most popular when it comes to real estate appraisal. Used as a reference in real estate expertise and as one of the major types of Automatic Valuation Models (AVM), it recently gained popularity within machine learning methods. The performance of models able to use data represented as sets and graphs made it possible to adapt this methodology efficiently, yielding substantial results. SCA relies on taking past transactions (comparables) as references, selected according to their similarity with the target property's sale. In this study, we focus on the selection of these comparables for real estate appraisal. We demonstrate that the selection of comparables used in many state-of-the-art algorithms can be significantly improved by learning a selection policy instead of imposing it. Our method relies on a hybrid vector-geographical retrieval module capable of adapting to different datasets and optimized jointly with an estimation module. We further show that the use of carefully selected comparables makes it possible to build models that require fewer comparables and fewer parameters with performance close to state-of-the-art models. All our evaluations are made on five datasets which span areas in the United States, Brazil, and France.

Related papers

• Deep Learning for Cross-Border Electricity Price Forecasting: A Comparative Study [0.0]
  We use public data to evaluate deep learning models for electricity price forecasting (EPF) across multiple market settings.<n>Our goal is to establish a reproducible framework that enables a consistent evaluation of forecasting models.<n>N-HiTS and NBEATSx perform competitively in limited-data scenarios, while transformer-based models can reach comparable accuracy but tend to require more adaptation and tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T19:57:59Z)
• Ranked from Within: Ranking Large Multimodal Models Without Labels [73.96543593298426]
  We show that uncertainty scores derived from softmax distributions provide a robust basis for ranking models across various tasks.<n>This facilitates the ranking of LMMs on unlabeled data, providing a practical approach for selecting models for diverse target domains without requiring manual annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T13:05:43Z)
• Beyond Benchmarks: Evaluating Embedding Model Similarity for Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [0.9976432338233169]
  We evaluate the similarity of embedding models within the context of RAG systems. We compare different families of embedding models, including proprietary ones, across five datasets. We identify possible open-source alternatives to proprietary models, with Mistral exhibiting the highest similarity to OpenAI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T08:24:16Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Scaling Laws Do Not Scale [54.72120385955072]
  Recent work has argued that as the size of a dataset increases, the performance of a model trained on that dataset will increase. We argue that this scaling law relationship depends on metrics used to measure performance that may not correspond with how different groups of people perceive the quality of models' output. Different communities may also have values in tension with each other, leading to difficult, potentially irreconcilable choices about metrics used for model evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T15:32:21Z)
• Evaluating Representations with Readout Model Switching [19.907607374144167]
  In this paper, we propose to use the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle to devise an evaluation metric. We design a hybrid discrete and continuous-valued model space for the readout models and employ a switching strategy to combine their predictions. The proposed metric can be efficiently computed with an online method and we present results for pre-trained vision encoders of various architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T14:08:01Z)
• Multidimensional Item Response Theory in the Style of Collaborative Filtering [0.8057006406834467]
  This paper presents a machine learning approach to multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) Inspired by collaborative filtering, we define a general class of models that includes many MIRT models. We discuss the use of penalized joint maximum likelihood (JML) to estimate individual models and cross-validation to select the best performing model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T00:56:27Z)
• Rating Triggers for Collateral-Inclusive XVA via Machine Learning and SDEs on Lie Groups [0.0]
  We model the rating process of an entity by using a geometrical approach. We show how the classical Girsanov theorem can be applied in the Lie group setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T08:26:25Z)
• Enhancing the Generalization for Intent Classification and Out-of-Domain Detection in SLU [70.44344060176952]
  Intent classification is a major task in spoken language understanding (SLU) Recent works have shown that using extra data and labels can improve the OOD detection performance. This paper proposes to train a model with only IND data while supporting both IND intent classification and OOD detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-28T08:27:38Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.