Neuron-Aware Data Selection In Instruction Tuning For Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13201v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:39:03 GMT
• Title: Neuron-Aware Data Selection In Instruction Tuning For Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Instruction Tuning (IT) has been proven to be an effective approach to unlock the powerful capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>Recent studies indicate that excessive IT data can degrade LLMs performance, while carefully selecting a small subset of high-quality IT data can significantly enhance their capabilities.<n>We propose a novel and efficient framework called NAIT to identify the most efficient subset data from the IT dataset.
• Score: 69.08560711834848
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Instruction Tuning (IT) has been proven to be an effective approach to unlock the powerful capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Recent studies indicate that excessive IT data can degrade LLMs performance, while carefully selecting a small subset of high-quality IT data can significantly enhance their capabilities. Therefore, identifying the most efficient subset data from the IT dataset to effectively develop either specific or general abilities in LLMs has become a critical challenge. To address this, we propose a novel and efficient framework called NAIT. NAIT evaluates the impact of IT data on LLMs performance by analyzing the similarity of neuron activation patterns between the IT dataset and the target domain capability. Specifically, NAIT captures neuron activation patterns from in-domain datasets of target domain capabilities to construct reusable and transferable neuron activation features. It then evaluates and selects optimal samples based on the similarity between candidate samples and the expected activation features of the target capabilities. Experimental results show that training on the 10\% Alpaca-GPT4 IT data subset selected by NAIT consistently outperforms methods that rely on external advanced models or uncertainty-based features across various tasks. Our findings also reveal the transferability of neuron activation features across different capabilities of LLMs. In particular, IT data with more logical reasoning and programmatic features possesses strong general transferability, enabling models to develop stronger capabilities across multiple tasks, while a stable core subset of data is sufficient to consistently activate fundamental model capabilities and universally improve performance across diverse tasks.

Related papers

• From Insight to Action: A Novel Framework for Interpretability-Guided Data Selection in Large Language Models [73.72877445629383]
  Interpretability-Guided Data Selection (IGDS) is a framework that first identifies causal task features through frequency recall and interventional filtering.<n>We validate IGDS on mathematical reasoning, summarization, and translation tasks within Gemma-2, LLaMA-3.1, and Qwen3 models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T03:16:24Z)
• Latent Traits and Cross-Task Transfer: Deconstructing Dataset Interactions in LLM Fine-tuning [8.082936847467638]
  We propose an analysis framework, building a transfer learning matrix and dimensionality reduction, to dissect cross-task interactions.<n>We train and analyze 10 models to identify latent abilities (e.g., Reasoning, Sentiment Classification, NLU, Arithmetic) and discover the side effects of the transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T01:45:42Z)
• Large Language Model as Meta-Surrogate for Data-Driven Many-Task Optimization: A Proof-of-Principle Study [11.452011929848844]
  This study proposes a novel meta-surrogate framework to assist many-task optimization.<n>We formulate a unified framework for many-task fitness prediction, by defining a universal model with metadata to fit a group of problems.<n>Our framework supports dual-level knowledge transfer -- at both the surrogate and individual levels -- enhancing optimization efficiency and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T11:13:11Z)
• LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science.<n>Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z)
• SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflection [47.180664081322035]
  We propose a novel approach to tailoring large language models (LLMs) with instruction tuning (IT)<n>We exploit the intrinsic uncertainty present in LLMs to more effectively select high-quality IT data, without the need for extra resources.<n>Our findings suggest that longer and more computationally intensive IT data may serve as superior sources of IT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:21:53Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• Learning Objective-Specific Active Learning Strategies with Attentive Neural Processes [72.75421975804132]
  Learning Active Learning (LAL) suggests to learn the active learning strategy itself, allowing it to adapt to the given setting. We propose a novel LAL method for classification that exploits symmetry and independence properties of the active learning problem. Our approach is based on learning from a myopic oracle, which gives our model the ability to adapt to non-standard objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T14:16:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.