Slang Context-based Inference Enhancement via Greedy Search-Guided Chain-of-Thought Prompting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13230v1
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:15:11 GMT
- Title: Slang Context-based Inference Enhancement via Greedy Search-Guided Chain-of-Thought Prompting
- Abstract summary: This paper investigates the challenges of slang inference using large language models.<n>We present a greedy search-guided chain-of-thought framework for slang interpretation.
- Score: 3.2239703628634095
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Slang interpretation has been a challenging downstream task for Large Language Models (LLMs) as the expressions are inherently embedded in contextual, cultural, and linguistic frameworks. In the absence of domain-specific training data, it is difficult for LLMs to accurately interpret slang meaning based on lexical information. This paper attempts to investigate the challenges of slang inference using large LLMs and presents a greedy search-guided chain-of-thought framework for slang interpretation. Through our experiments, we conclude that the model size and temperature settings have limited impact on inference accuracy. Transformer-based models with larger active parameters do not generate higher accuracy than smaller models. Based on the results of the above empirical study, we integrate greedy search algorithms with chain-of-thought prompting for small language models to build a framework that improves the accuracy of slang interpretation. The experimental results indicate that our proposed framework demonstrates improved accuracy in slang meaning interpretation. These findings contribute to the understanding of context dependency in language models and provide a practical solution for enhancing slang comprehension through a structured reasoning prompting framework.
Related papers
- Hybrid Neural-LLM Pipeline for Morphological Glossing in Endangered Language Documentation: A Case Study of Jungar Tuvan [6.367163817135528]
We present a hybrid automatic glossing pipeline that combines neural sequence labeling with large language model (LLM) post-correction.<n>We show that retrieval-augmented prompting provides substantial gains over random example selection.<n>We also find that morpheme dictionaries paradoxically hurt performance compared to providing no dictionary at all in most cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T05:03:11Z) - Improving Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Language Models through Dialectic Reasoning Argumentations [65.11348389219887]
We introduce Dialectic-RAG (DRAG), a modular approach that evaluates retrieved information by comparing, contrasting, and resolving conflicting perspectives.<n>We show the impact of our framework both as an in-context learning strategy and for constructing demonstrations to instruct smaller models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T06:55:15Z) - Beyond Memorization: Assessing Semantic Generalization in Large Language Models Using Phrasal Constructions [3.0906699069248806]
Construction Grammar (CxG) is a psycholinguistically grounded framework for testing generalization.<n>Our dataset consists of English phrasal constructions, for which speakers are known to be able to abstract over commonplace instantiations.<n>Our results demonstrate that state-of-the-art models, including GPT-o1, exhibit a performance drop of over 40% on our second task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T18:15:10Z) - Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing.
We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM.
We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z) - The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance.
Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes.
We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z) - Can Large Language Models Understand Context? [17.196362853457412]
This paper introduces a context understanding benchmark by adapting existing datasets to suit the evaluation of generative models.
Experimental results indicate that pre-trained dense models struggle with understanding more nuanced contextual features when compared to state-of-the-art fine-tuned models.
As LLM compression holds growing significance in both research and real-world applications, we assess the context understanding of quantized models under in-context-learning settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T18:55:29Z) - In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax [36.98247762224868]
In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks.
Do models infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial generalizations that only generalize to identically distributed examples?
In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs.
The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T23:52:43Z) - RAVEN: In-Context Learning with Retrieval-Augmented Encoder-Decoder Language Models [57.12888828853409]
RAVEN is a model that combines retrieval-augmented masked language modeling and prefix language modeling.
Fusion-in-Context Learning enables the model to leverage more in-context examples without requiring additional training.
Our work underscores the potential of retrieval-augmented encoder-decoder language models for in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T17:59:18Z) - Fairness-guided Few-shot Prompting for Large Language Models [93.05624064699965]
In-context learning can suffer from high instability due to variations in training examples, example order, and prompt formats.
We introduce a metric to evaluate the predictive bias of a fixed prompt against labels or a given attributes.
We propose a novel search strategy based on the greedy search to identify the near-optimal prompt for improving the performance of in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T12:28:25Z) - Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word
Matters Pre-training for Little [74.49773960145681]
A possible explanation for the impressive performance of masked language model (MLM)-training is that such models have learned to represent the syntactic structures prevalent in NLP pipelines.
In this paper, we propose a different explanation: pre-trains succeed on downstream tasks almost entirely due to their ability to model higher-order word co-occurrence statistics.
Our results show that purely distributional information largely explains the success of pre-training, and underscore the importance of curating challenging evaluation datasets that require deeper linguistic knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-14T06:30:36Z) - Data Augmentation for Spoken Language Understanding via Pretrained
Language Models [113.56329266325902]
Training of spoken language understanding (SLU) models often faces the problem of data scarcity.
We put forward a data augmentation method using pretrained language models to boost the variability and accuracy of generated utterances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T04:07:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.