Your Code Agent Can Grow Alongside You with Structured Memory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13258v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 06:39:29 GMT
- Title: Your Code Agent Can Grow Alongside You with Structured Memory
- Abstract summary: We propose MemCoder, a framework designed to enable continual human-AI co-evolution.<n>MemCoder first structures historical human experience to distill latent intent-to-code mappings from past commits.<n>It then employs a self-refinement mechanism driven by verification feedback to correct agent behavior in real-time.
- Score: 6.836735626065529
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While "Intent-oriented programming" (or "Vibe Coding") redefines software engineering, existing code agents remain tethered to static code snapshots. Consequently, they struggle to model the critical information embedded in the temporal evolution of projects, failing to leverage the "reasoning trajectories" implicit in past successful practices. This limitation results in rigid behavioral logic and a lack of autonomous adaptability, ultimately hindering their ability to tackle complex, repository-level problems. To bridge this static-dynamic mismatch, we propose MemCoder, a framework designed to enable continual human-AI co-evolution. MemCoder first structures historical human experience to distill latent intent-to-code mappings from past commits. It then employs a self-refinement mechanism driven by verification feedback to correct agent behavior in real-time. Crucially, an experience self-internalization mechanism is introduced to crystallize human-validated solutions into long-term knowledge, thereby supporting sustained evolution. Experimental results on SWE-bench Verified demonstrate that MemCoder not only achieves State-of-the-Art (SOTA) performance but also delivers a 9.4% improvement in resolved rate over the general foundation model DeepSeek-V3.2. These findings indicate that equipping agents with the capability to co-evolve with humans via project history and real-time feedback effectively unlocks the potential of general models in complex software engineering tasks.
Related papers
- Self-Evolving Coding Agents [11.43197414613246]
Self-evolving coding agents can inspect repositories, invoke tools, execute tests, debug failures, and generate patches.<n>We first define self-evolving coding agents and distinguish them from conventional coding agents and general self-evolving agents.<n>We find that executable feedback, repository-level context, and coding trajectories give software engineering a distinctive role as a natural domain for agent self-evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-04T09:43:46Z) - Skill Self-Play: Pushing the Frontier of LLM Capability with Co-Evolving Skills [53.15216425100295]
We introduce Skill Self-Play (Skill-SP), a co-evolutionary framework comprising a proposer, a solver, and a skill controller.<n>The proposer generates challenging tasks conditioned on dynamically sampled skills; the solver explores candidate solutions to push its capability boundaries; and the skill controller collects execution feedback to update and expand the skill library.<n>This interactive co-evolution effectively bridges the gap between structured verification and open-ended exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-24T17:59:22Z) - Self-evolving LLM agents with in-distribution Optimization [60.05867547965365]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful controllers for interactive agents in complex environments.<n>We propose Q-Evolve, a self-evolving framework for LLM agents that unifies automatic process-reward labeling and policy learning.<n>We evaluate our method on AlfWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld, showing Q-Evolve outperforms strong baselines in sample efficiency, robustness, and overall task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T15:09:52Z) - Learning Without Losing Identity: Capability Evolution for Embodied Agents [14.412476605788482]
We propose a capability-centric evolution paradigm for embodied agents.<n>We argue that a robot should maintain a persistent agent as its cognitive identity.<n>We present a unified framework in which capability evolution is decoupled from agent identity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T04:51:07Z) - EvoClaw: Evaluating AI Agents on Continuous Software Evolution [47.49468375065129]
We introduce DeepCommit, an agentic pipeline that reconstructs verifiable Milestone DAGs from noisy commit logs.<n>These executable sequences enable EvoClaw, a novel benchmark that requires agents to sustain system integrity and limit error accumulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T03:20:40Z) - Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z) - Beyond the 'Diff': Addressing Agentic Entropy in Agentic Software Development [42.371764229953165]
We propose a process-oriented explainability framework that exposes how agentic decisions unfold across time, tool calls, and architectural boundaries.<n>Our approach provides intent-level telemetry that complements, rather than replaces, existing review practices.<n>By treating cognitive drift as a first-class concern alongside code quality, our framework supports the minimum level of human comprehension required for agentic oversight to remain substantive.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T12:55:28Z) - daVinci-Agency: Unlocking Long-Horizon Agency Data-Efficiently [35.39097522391409]
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at short-term tasks, scaling them to long-horizon agentic synthesis remains challenging.<n>We propose daVinci-Agency, which systematically mines structured supervision from chain-of-PRs.<n>DaVinci-Agency's PR-grounded structure inherently preserves the causal dependencies and iterative refinements essential for teaching persistent goal-cycle behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T13:23:39Z) - EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z) - Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z) - EvoSyn: Generalizable Evolutionary Data Synthesis for Verifiable Learning [63.03672166010434]
We introduce an evolutionary, task-agnostic, strategy-guided, executably-checkable data synthesis framework.<n>It jointly synthesizes problems, diverse candidate solutions, and verification artifacts.<n>It iteratively discovers strategies via a consistency-based evaluator that enforces agreement between human-annotated and strategy-induced checks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T11:56:35Z) - SWE-Bench-CL: Continual Learning for Coding Agents [0.0]
SWE-Bench-CL is a novel continual learning benchmark built on the human-verified SWE-Bench Verified dataset.<n>By organizing GitHub issues into chronologically ordered sequences that reflect natural repository evolution, SWE-Bench-CL enables direct evaluation of an agent's ability to accumulate experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-13T07:11:14Z) - Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.