Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemma

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13294v3
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 01:47:04 GMT
• Title: Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemma
• Abstract summary: Forum for Real World AI Measurement and Evaluation (FRAME)<n>Aims to combine large scale trials of AI systems with structured observation of how they are used in context.<n>Uses a Testing Sandbox that captures AI use under real at scale and a Metrics Hub that translates those traces into actionable indicators.
• Score: 0.08594140167290099
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid expansion of AI deployments has put organizational leaders in a decision maker's dilemma: they must govern these technologies without systematic evidence of how systems behave in their own environments. Predominant evaluation methods generate scalable, abstract measures of model capabilities but smooth over the heterogeneity of real world use, while user focused testing reveals rich contextual detail yet remains small in scale and loosely coupled to the mechanisms that shape model behavior. The Forum for Real World AI Measurement and Evaluation (FRAME) addresses this gap by combining large scale trials of AI systems with structured observation of how they are used in context, the outcomes they generate, and how those outcomes arise. By tracing the path from an AI system's output through its practical use and downstream effects, FRAME turns the heterogeneity of AI in use into a measurable signal rather than a trade off for achieving scale. FRAME establishes two core assets to accomplish this: a Testing Sandbox that captures AI use under real workflows at scale and a Metrics Hub that translates those traces into actionable indicators.

Related papers

• An End-to-End Decision-Aware Multi-Scale Attention-Based Model for Explainable Autonomous Driving [0.6662501454516897]
  We propose a multi-scale attention-based model in which driving decisions are fed into the reasoning component to provide case-specific explanations for each decision simultaneously.<n>The results demonstrate the superiority of our reasoning network over the classic and state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T23:27:39Z)
• Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond [209.35045331678043]
  We introduce a "levels x laws" taxonomy organized along two axes.<n>The first defines three capability levels: L1 Predictor, which learns one-step local transition operators; L2 Simulator, which composes them into multi-step, action-conditioned rollouts that respect domain laws; and L3 Evolver, which autonomously revises its own model when predictions fail against new evidence.<n>We synthesize over 400 works and summarize more than 100 representative systems spanning model-based reinforcement learning, video generation, web and GUI agents, multi-agent social simulation, and AI-driven scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T17:48:47Z)
• ManipArena: Comprehensive Real-world Evaluation of Reasoning-Oriented Generalist Robot Manipulation [66.02142169323521]
  Vision-Language-Action models and world models have recently emerged as promising paradigms for general-purpose robotic intelligence.<n>Existing benchmarks are largely simulator-centric, which provide controllability but fail to capture the reality gap caused by perception noise.<n>We introduce ManipArena, a standardized evaluation framework designed to bridge simulation and real-world execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T15:06:41Z)
• CIRCLE: A Framework for Evaluating AI from a Real-World Lens [10.028017198571833]
  CIRCLE aims to bridge the gap between model-centric performance metrics and AI's materialized outcomes in deployment.<n>CIRCLE provides a structured, prospective protocol for linking context-sensitive qualitative insights to scalable quantitative metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T14:43:23Z)
• AI-NativeBench: An Open-Source White-Box Agentic Benchmark Suite for AI-Native Systems [52.65695508605237]
  We introduce AI-NativeBench, the first application-centric and white-box AI-Native benchmark suite grounded in Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) standards.<n>By treating agentic spans as first-class citizens within distributed traces, our methodology enables granular analysis of engineering characteristics beyond simple capabilities.<n>This work provides the first systematic evidence to guide the transition from measuring model capability to engineering reliable AI-Native systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T11:32:07Z)
• Code-in-the-Loop Forensics: Agentic Tool Use for Image Forgery Detection [59.04089915447622]
  ForenAgent is an interactive IFD framework that enables MLLMs to autonomously generate, execute, and refine Python-based low-level tools around the detection objective.<n>Inspired by human reasoning, we design a dynamic reasoning loop comprising global perception, local focusing, iterative probing, and holistic adjudication.<n>Experiments show that ForenAgent exhibits emergent tool-use competence and reflective reasoning on challenging IFD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:38:44Z)
• Towards Robust Artificial Intelligence: Self-Supervised Learning Approach for Out-of-Distribution Detection [0.19599274203282294]
  This paper proposes an approach to improve OOD detection without the need of labeled data.<n>The proposed approach leverages the principles of self-supervised learning, allowing the model to learn useful representations from unlabeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T16:55:25Z)
• A Style-Based Profiling Framework for Quantifying the Synthetic-to-Real Gap in Autonomous Driving Datasets [9.788200709163064]
  This paper introduces a profile extraction and discovery framework for characterizing the style profiles underlying both synthetic and real image datasets.<n>Our framework combines Gram matrix-based style extraction with metric learning optimized for intra-class compactness and inter-class separation to extract style embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T13:09:41Z)
• Topology-Aware Modeling for Unsupervised Simulation-to-Reality Point Cloud Recognition [63.55828203989405]
  We introduce a novel Topology-Aware Modeling (TAM) framework for Sim2Real UDA on object point clouds.<n>Our approach mitigates the domain gap by leveraging global spatial topology, characterized by low-level, high-frequency 3D structures.<n>We propose an advanced self-training strategy that combines cross-domain contrastive learning with self-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T11:53:59Z)
• Generalising from Self-Produced Data: Model Training Beyond Human Constraints [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework in which AI models autonomously generate and validate new knowledge.<n>Central to this approach is an unbounded, ungamable numeric reward that guides learning without requiring human benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:48:02Z)
• ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generation [55.485985317538194]
  ProcTHOR is a framework for procedural generation of Embodied AI environments. We demonstrate state-of-the-art results across 6 embodied AI benchmarks for navigation, rearrangement, and arm manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T17:09:35Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)
• Measuring the Complexity of Domains Used to Evaluate AI Systems [0.48951183832371004]
  We propose a theory for measuring the complexity between varied domains. An application of this measure is then demonstrated to show its effectiveness as a tool in varied situations. We propose the future use of such a complexity metric for use in computing an AI system's intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T21:53:07Z)
• Guided Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: Combining Learning and Model-Based Strategies for Sample-Efficient Policy Learning [75.56839075060819]
  Traditional robotic approaches rely on an accurate model of the environment, a detailed description of how to perform the task, and a robust perception system to keep track of the current state. reinforcement learning approaches can operate directly from raw sensory inputs with only a reward signal to describe the task, but are extremely sample-inefficient and brittle. In this work, we combine the strengths of model-based methods with the flexibility of learning-based methods to obtain a general method that is able to overcome inaccuracies in the robotics perception/actuation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T19:47:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.