An End-to-End Decision-Aware Multi-Scale Attention-Based Model for Explainable Autonomous Driving
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00291v1
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:27:39 GMT
- Title: An End-to-End Decision-Aware Multi-Scale Attention-Based Model for Explainable Autonomous Driving
- Abstract summary: We propose a multi-scale attention-based model in which driving decisions are fed into the reasoning component to provide case-specific explanations for each decision simultaneously.<n>The results demonstrate the superiority of our reasoning network over the classic and state-of-the-art models.
- Score: 0.6662501454516897
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The application of computer vision is gradually increasing across various domains. They employ deep learning models with a black-box nature. Without the ability to explain the behavior of neural networks, especially their decision-making processes, it is not possible to recognize their efficiency, predict system failures, or effectively implement them in real-world applications. Due to the inevitable use of deep learning in fully automated driving systems, many methods have been proposed to explain their behavior; however, they suffer from flawed reasoning and unreliable metrics, which have prevented a comprehensive understanding of complex models in autonomous vehicles and hindered the development of truly reliable systems. In this study, we propose a multi-scale attention-based model in which driving decisions are fed into the reasoning component to provide case-specific explanations for each decision simultaneously. For quantitative evaluation of our model's performance, we employ the F1-score metric, and also proposed a new metric called the Joint F1 score to demonstrate the accurate and reliable performance of the model in terms of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). In addition to the BDD-OIA dataset, the nu-AR dataset is utilized to further validate the generalization capability and robustness of the proposed network. The results demonstrate the superiority of our reasoning network over the classic and state-of-the-art models.
Related papers
- From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z) - World Models for Cognitive Agents: Transforming Edge Intelligence in Future Networks [55.90051810762702]
We present a comprehensive overview of world models, highlighting their architecture, training paradigms, and applications across prediction, generation, planning, and causal reasoning.<n>We propose Wireless Dreamer, a novel world model-based reinforcement learning framework tailored for wireless edge intelligence optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-31T06:43:00Z) - VACT: A Video Automatic Causal Testing System and a Benchmark [55.53300306960048]
VACT is an **automated** framework for modeling, evaluating, and measuring the causal understanding of VGMs in real-world scenarios.<n>We introduce multi-level causal evaluation metrics to provide a detailed analysis of the causal performance of VGMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T10:54:42Z) - SynthTree: Co-supervised Local Model Synthesis for Explainable Prediction [15.832975722301011]
We propose a novel method to enhance explainability with minimal accuracy loss.
We have developed novel methods for estimating nodes by leveraging AI techniques.
Our findings highlight the critical role that statistical methodologies can play in advancing explainable AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T14:43:01Z) - AIDE: An Automatic Data Engine for Object Detection in Autonomous Driving [68.73885845181242]
We propose an Automatic Data Engine (AIDE) that automatically identifies issues, efficiently curates data, improves the model through auto-labeling, and verifies the model through generation of diverse scenarios.
We further establish a benchmark for open-world detection on AV datasets to comprehensively evaluate various learning paradigms, demonstrating our method's superior performance at a reduced cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T04:27:56Z) - Enhancing Dynamical System Modeling through Interpretable Machine
Learning Augmentations: A Case Study in Cathodic Electrophoretic Deposition [0.8796261172196743]
We introduce a comprehensive data-driven framework aimed at enhancing the modeling of physical systems.
As a demonstrative application, we pursue the modeling of cathodic electrophoretic deposition (EPD), commonly known as e-coating.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T14:58:21Z) - Learning An Active Inference Model of Driver Perception and Control: Application to Vehicle Car-Following [9.837204436270811]
We introduce a general estimation methodology for learning a model of human perception and control in a sensorimotor control task.<n>We consider a model's structure specification consistent with active inference, a theory of human perception and behavior from cognitive science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-27T13:39:26Z) - Evaluating Explainability in Machine Learning Predictions through Explainer-Agnostic Metrics [0.0]
We develop six distinct model-agnostic metrics designed to quantify the extent to which model predictions can be explained.
These metrics measure different aspects of model explainability, ranging from local importance, global importance, and surrogate predictions.
We demonstrate the practical utility of these metrics on classification and regression tasks, and integrate these metrics into an existing Python package for public use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T15:28:36Z) - ComplAI: Theory of A Unified Framework for Multi-factor Assessment of
Black-Box Supervised Machine Learning Models [6.279863832853343]
ComplAI is a unique framework to enable, observe, analyze and quantify explainability, robustness, performance, fairness, and model behavior.
It evaluates different supervised Machine Learning models not just from their ability to make correct predictions but from overall responsibility perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-30T08:48:19Z) - Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory
Prediction [50.79827516897913]
We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts.
We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z) - Explainable Human-in-the-loop Dynamic Data-Driven Digital Twins [6.657586324950896]
Digital Twins (DT) are essentially Dynamic Data-driven models that serve as real-time symbiotic "virtual replicas" of real-world systems.
This paper is an approach to harnessing explainability in human-in-the-loop DDDAS and DT systems, leveraging bidirectional symbiotic sensing feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T07:15:12Z) - Model-Based Deep Learning [155.063817656602]
Signal processing, communications, and control have traditionally relied on classical statistical modeling techniques.
Deep neural networks (DNNs) use generic architectures which learn to operate from data, and demonstrate excellent performance.
We are interested in hybrid techniques that combine principled mathematical models with data-driven systems to benefit from the advantages of both approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-15T16:29:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.