Six Interventions for the Responsible and Ethical Implementation of Medical AI Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13743v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 04:28:59 GMT
• Title: Six Interventions for the Responsible and Ethical Implementation of Medical AI Agents
• Abstract summary: Large language model (LLM)-based AI agents may soon participate in medical decision-making with limited or no real-time human oversight.<n>This shift raises fundamental questions about how the core principles of medical ethics can be upheld when the clinical responsibility extends to autonomous systems.<n>Here we propose an ethics-by-design framework for medical AI agents comprising six practical interventions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based AI agents are increasingly capable of complex clinical reasoning and may soon participate in medical decision-making with limited or no real-time human oversight. This shift raises fundamental questions about how the core principles of medical ethics (i.e., beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice) can be upheld when the clinical responsibility extends to autonomous systems. Here we propose an ethics-by-design framework for medical AI agents comprising six practical interventions: auditable ethical reasoning modules, explicit human override conditions, structured patient preference profiles, AI-specific ethics oversight tools, global benchmarking repositories for ethical scenarios, and regulatory sandboxes for real-world evaluation. Together, these mechanisms aim to operationalize ethical governance for emerging clinical AI agents. https://github.com/BissonTom/Ethical-Governance-of-Medical-AI-Agents

Related papers

• Agentic AI, Medical Morality, and the Transformation of the Patient-Physician Relationship [0.0]
  Agentic AI systems are capable of autonomous, goal-directed actions and complex task coordination.<n>This article explores how agentic AI might reshape the patient-physician relationship and reconfigure core concepts of medical morality.<n>Ultimately, the paper calls for integrating ethical foresight into the design and use of agentic AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T15:54:17Z)
• Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Review [104.3684024153469]
  Mirror is an agentic framework for AI-assisted ethical review.<n>It integrates ethical reasoning, structured rule interpretation, and multi-agent deliberation within a unified architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:38:55Z)
• EthicsMH: A Pilot Benchmark for Ethical Reasoning in Mental Health AI [0.2538209532048867]
  This dataset is a pilot dataset of 125 scenarios designed to evaluate how AI systems navigate ethically charged situations.<n>EthicsMH establishes a task framework that bridges AI ethics and mental health decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T07:35:35Z)
• Ethical AI in the Healthcare Sector: Investigating Key Drivers of Adoption through the Multi-Dimensional Ethical AI Adoption Model (MEAAM) [1.5458951336481048]
  This study introduces the Multi-Dimensional Ethical AI Adoption Model (MEAAM)<n>It categorizes 13 critical ethical variables across four foundational dimensions of Ethical AI Fair AI, Responsible AI, Explainable AI, and Sustainable AI.<n>It investigates the influence of these ethical constructs on two outcomes Operational AI Adoption and Systemic AI Adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T10:40:05Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Towards Next-Generation Medical Agent: How o1 is Reshaping Decision-Making in Medical Scenarios [46.729092855387165]
  We study the choice of the backbone LLM for medical AI agents, which is the foundation for the agent's overall reasoning and action generation.<n>Our findings demonstrate o1's ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, paving the way for smarter, more responsive AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T18:19:53Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence [0.08192907805418582]
  This study attempts to identify the major ethical principles influencing the utility performance of AI at different technological levels. Justice, privacy, bias, lack of regulations, risks, and interpretability are the most important principles to consider for ethical AI. We propose a new utilitarian ethics-based theoretical framework for designing ethical AI for the healthcare domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T02:10:58Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
  The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape. This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.