Computational Analysis of Semantic Connections Between Herman Melville Reading and Writing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14674v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 23:59:35 GMT
• Title: Computational Analysis of Semantic Connections Between Herman Melville Reading and Writing
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the potential influence of Herman Melville reading on his own writings through computational semantic similarity analysis.<n>We compare selected passages from his works with texts from his library.<n>The methodology involves segmenting texts at both sentence level and non-overlapping 5-gram level, followed by similarity computation using BERTScore.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigates the potential influence of Herman Melville reading on his own writings through computational semantic similarity analysis. Using documented records of books known to have been owned or read by Melville, we compare selected passages from his works with texts from his library. The methodology involves segmenting texts at both sentence level and non-overlapping 5-gram level, followed by similarity computation using BERTScore. Rather than applying fixed thresholds to determine reuse, we interpret precision, recall, and F1 scores as indicators of possible semantic alignment that may suggest literary influence. Experimental results demonstrate that the approach successfully captures expert-identified instances of similarity and highlights additional passages warranting further qualitative examination. The findings suggest that semantic similarity methods provide a useful computational framework for supporting source and influence studies in literary scholarship.

Related papers

• Beyond Similarity: Grounded Agentic Extraction and Expert-Adjudicated Evaluation of Intertextuality in Classical Chinese Histories [3.694051864521789]
  We recast fine-grained intertextuality extraction as an agentic task in which a large language model reads two text units in full.<n>We validate the approach on an exhaustive comparison of the Analects with the Book of Han, where three domain experts adjudicate a pooled multi-model candidate set into a benchmark of 2,533 intertextual pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T02:34:23Z)
• Towards a Linguistic Evaluation of Narratives: A Quantitative Stylistic Framework [51.56484100374058]
  This work proposes a quantitative approach to narrative assessment by focusing on the linguistic dimension as a primary indicator of quality.<n>The paper presents a methodology for the automatic evaluation of narrative based on the extraction of a comprehensive set of 33 quantitative linguistic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T09:21:40Z)
• Estimating the Influence of Sequentially Correlated Literary Properties in Textual Classification: A Data-Centric Hypothesis-Testing Approach [4.161155428666988]
  We introduce a data-centric hypothesis-testing framework to quantify the influence of sequentially correlated literary properties.<n>We compare traditional (word n-grams and character k-mers) and neural (contrastively trained) embeddings in both supervised and unsupervised classification settings.<n>Our results demonstrate that controlling for sequential correlation is essential for reducing false positives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T18:28:40Z)
• Combining Qualitative and Computational Approaches for Literary Analysis of Finnish Novels [0.0]
  We present and develop a computational approach of affect analysis that uses an emotion lexicon adapted to Finnish literary texts. We show that computational approaches have a place in traditional studies on affect in literature as a support tool for close-reading-based analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T06:07:44Z)
• Rethinking Evaluation Metrics of Open-Vocabulary Segmentaion [78.76867266561537]
  The evaluation process still heavily relies on closed-set metrics without considering the similarity between predicted and ground truth categories. To tackle this issue, we first survey eleven similarity measurements between two categorical words. We designed novel evaluation metrics, namely Open mIoU, Open AP, and Open PQ, tailored for three open-vocabulary segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T18:59:01Z)
• A Comparative Study of Sentence Embedding Models for Assessing Semantic Variation [0.0]
  We compare several recent sentence embedding methods via time-series of semantic similarity between successive sentences and matrices of pairwise sentence similarity for multiple books of literature. We find that most of the sentence embedding methods considered do infer highly correlated patterns of semantic similarity in a given document, but show interesting differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T23:31:10Z)
• Relational Sentence Embedding for Flexible Semantic Matching [86.21393054423355]
  We present Sentence Embedding (RSE), a new paradigm to discover further the potential of sentence embeddings. RSE is effective and flexible in modeling sentence relations and outperforms a series of state-of-the-art embedding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T05:25:17Z)
• PART: Pre-trained Authorship Representation Transformer [52.623051272843426]
  Authors writing documents imprint identifying information within their texts.<n>Previous works use hand-crafted features or classification tasks to train their authorship models.<n>We propose a contrastively trained model fit to learn textbfauthorship embeddings instead of semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T11:08:39Z)
• Syllabic Quantity Patterns as Rhythmic Features for Latin Authorship Attribution [74.27826764855911]
  We employ syllabic quantity as a base for deriving rhythmic features for the task of computational authorship attribution of Latin prose texts. Our experiments, carried out on three different datasets, using two different machine learning methods, show that rhythmic features based on syllabic quantity are beneficial in discriminating among Latin prose authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T06:25:31Z)
• A Case Study to Reveal if an Area of Interest has a Trend in Ongoing Tweets Using Word and Sentence Embeddings [0.0]
  We have proposed an easily applicable automated methodology in which the Daily Mean Similarity Scores show the similarity between the daily tweet corpus and the target words. The Daily Mean Similarity Scores have mainly based on cosine similarity and word/sentence embeddings. We have also compared the effectiveness of using word versus sentence embeddings while applying our methodology and realized that both give almost the same results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T18:44:55Z)
• Relation Clustering in Narrative Knowledge Graphs [71.98234178455398]
  relational sentences in the original text are embedded (with SBERT) and clustered in order to merge together semantically similar relations. Preliminary tests show that such clustering might successfully detect similar relations, and provide a valuable preprocessing for semi-supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T10:43:04Z)
• A Comparative Study on Structural and Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a set of experiments using a widely-used large-scale data set for relation extraction. We show that different embedding spaces have different degrees of strength for the structural and semantic properties. These results provide useful information for developing embedding-based relation extraction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-23T15:45:32Z)
• Article citation study: Context enhanced citation sentiment detection [11.610277023001807]
  Citation sentimet analysis is one of the little studied tasks for scientometric analysis. We developed eight datasets comprising citation sentences, which are manually annotated by us into three sentiment polarities. We proposed an ensembled feature engineering method comprising word embeddings obtained for texts, parts-of-speech tags, and dependency relationships together.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T00:27:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.